An Inclusive Approach to the Preanesthetic Interview: Consensus Development of the Perioperative Gender-Diverse Assessment Tool (PGDAT).

Q3 Medicine
Callie Dolan, Kelly Gallant, Maria van Pelt, Nelson Aquino
{"title":"An Inclusive Approach to the Preanesthetic Interview: Consensus Development of the Perioperative Gender-Diverse Assessment Tool (PGDAT).","authors":"Callie Dolan, Kelly Gallant, Maria van Pelt, Nelson Aquino","doi":"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop an evidence-based perioperative assessment tool for anesthesiology professionals to supplement standard preoperative assessments, targeting the unique health needs of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients to enhance the perioperative experience. Many TGD patients express dissatisfaction with their care, while numerous healthcare professionals report feeling inadequately prepared to care for this population effectively. Using a modified Delphi design, a consensus-based Perioperative Gender-Diverse Assessment Tool (PGDAT) was developed to assist anesthesiology professionals in sensitively engaging with TGD patients and creating evidence-informed, patient-focused anesthetic plans. Fourteen expert panelists from the United States appraised the quality and clinical readiness of the PGDAT through iterative online surveys. Consensus was defined as 0.8 agreement among raters, and a thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke, with three core themes emerging. The interrater reliability was 0.75707 and 0.83977 using Gwet's AC2. The 0.8 consensus threshold was achieved after two survey rounds, which content-validated the PGDAT and established an evidence-based resource that future research opportunities can use to bring about systemic changes that promote safe and inclusive healthcare environments for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"94 2","pages":"123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an evidence-based perioperative assessment tool for anesthesiology professionals to supplement standard preoperative assessments, targeting the unique health needs of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients to enhance the perioperative experience. Many TGD patients express dissatisfaction with their care, while numerous healthcare professionals report feeling inadequately prepared to care for this population effectively. Using a modified Delphi design, a consensus-based Perioperative Gender-Diverse Assessment Tool (PGDAT) was developed to assist anesthesiology professionals in sensitively engaging with TGD patients and creating evidence-informed, patient-focused anesthetic plans. Fourteen expert panelists from the United States appraised the quality and clinical readiness of the PGDAT through iterative online surveys. Consensus was defined as 0.8 agreement among raters, and a thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke, with three core themes emerging. The interrater reliability was 0.75707 and 0.83977 using Gwet's AC2. The 0.8 consensus threshold was achieved after two survey rounds, which content-validated the PGDAT and established an evidence-based resource that future research opportunities can use to bring about systemic changes that promote safe and inclusive healthcare environments for all.

麻醉前访谈的包容性方法:围手术期性别多样化评估工具(PGDAT)的共识发展。
本研究旨在为麻醉专业人员开发一种循证的围手术期评估工具,以补充标准的术前评估,针对变性和性别多样化(TGD)患者的独特健康需求,提高围手术期体验。许多TGD患者对他们的护理表示不满,而许多医疗保健专业人员报告感觉没有充分准备有效地照顾这一人群。采用改进的德尔菲设计,开发了基于共识的围手术期性别多样化评估工具(PGDAT),以帮助麻醉专业人员敏感地与TGD患者接触,并制定循证、以患者为中心的麻醉计划。来自美国的14位专家小组成员通过反复的在线调查评估了PGDAT的质量和临床准备情况。共识被定义为评分者之间0.8的一致,并在Braun和Clarke之后进行了主题分析,出现了三个核心主题。采用Gwet’s AC2计算的互译信度分别为0.75707和0.83977。经过两轮调查,达到了0.8的共识阈值,这两轮调查对PGDAT进行了内容验证,并建立了一个基于证据的资源,未来的研究机会可以用来带来系统性变革,促进所有人的安全和包容的医疗环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书