Improving Early Literacy Skills for Autistic Children Who Use High-Tech AAC: Effects of a Parent-Delivered Intervention.

IF 0.7
Jessica Caron, Salena Babb, Tara O'Neill Zimmerman, Anicia Anderson
{"title":"Improving Early Literacy Skills for Autistic Children Who Use High-Tech AAC: Effects of a Parent-Delivered Intervention.","authors":"Jessica Caron, Salena Babb, Tara O'Neill Zimmerman, Anicia Anderson","doi":"10.1159/000551882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Literacy skills contribute to meaningful societal participation and maximize expressive language for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) users; however, AAC users continue to experience pervasively low levels of literacy achievement. Many extrinsic factors related to the instructional approaches, such as reliance on oral responding and the need for extensive retrofitting of materials, create significant barriers to literacy instruction for AAC users. There is a need for innovative, evidence-informed literacy interventions that incorporate adaptations and systematic instruction to improve outcomes for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single case experimental design with a multiple baseline across participants design was used to investigate the effects of the ALL app, implemented by trained parents, on the acquisition and generalization of three phonics-based early literacy skills (i.e., letter-sound correspondenses, sound blending, and sight words), with three children who had minimal or no speech and used high-tech AAC. The ALL app was implemented by parents who were virtually trained, and progress was monitored remotely by researchers. Social validity data were also collected from parents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants demonstrated progress in the three skills targeted, as well as generalization in sound blending, demonstrated by effect sizes from large to very large. The intervention was also efficient, with these gains occurring with only 10 weeks of instruction. These gains are notable given that the participants each entered the intervention knowing less than ten sight words and less than five letter sounds. Perception data from the parents are also shared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research and practice should aim to provide simultaneous instruction in foundational and interrelated literacy skills, support motivation and participation of AAC users through use of adaptations and numerous opportunities to apply skills in the context of meaningful shared literacy experiences, and use parent-implemented, direct instruction with explicit practice of target skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":520626,"journal":{"name":"Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Literacy skills contribute to meaningful societal participation and maximize expressive language for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) users; however, AAC users continue to experience pervasively low levels of literacy achievement. Many extrinsic factors related to the instructional approaches, such as reliance on oral responding and the need for extensive retrofitting of materials, create significant barriers to literacy instruction for AAC users. There is a need for innovative, evidence-informed literacy interventions that incorporate adaptations and systematic instruction to improve outcomes for this population.

Methods: A single case experimental design with a multiple baseline across participants design was used to investigate the effects of the ALL app, implemented by trained parents, on the acquisition and generalization of three phonics-based early literacy skills (i.e., letter-sound correspondenses, sound blending, and sight words), with three children who had minimal or no speech and used high-tech AAC. The ALL app was implemented by parents who were virtually trained, and progress was monitored remotely by researchers. Social validity data were also collected from parents.

Results: All participants demonstrated progress in the three skills targeted, as well as generalization in sound blending, demonstrated by effect sizes from large to very large. The intervention was also efficient, with these gains occurring with only 10 weeks of instruction. These gains are notable given that the participants each entered the intervention knowing less than ten sight words and less than five letter sounds. Perception data from the parents are also shared.

Conclusion: Future research and practice should aim to provide simultaneous instruction in foundational and interrelated literacy skills, support motivation and participation of AAC users through use of adaptations and numerous opportunities to apply skills in the context of meaningful shared literacy experiences, and use parent-implemented, direct instruction with explicit practice of target skills.

使用高科技AAC提高自闭症儿童早期读写能力:家长干预的效果。
简介:读写技能有助于有意义的社会参与,并最大限度地提高AAC用户的语言表达能力;然而,AAC用户的识字水平仍然普遍较低。与教学方法有关的许多外在因素,例如依赖口头反应和需要大量改进材料,对AAC用户的识字教学造成了重大障碍。有必要采取创新的、循证的扫盲干预措施,包括适应和系统的指导,以改善这一人群的结果。方法:采用单例实验设计,采用跨参与者多基线设计,研究由训练过的父母实施的ALL应用程序对三种基于语音的早期读写技能(即声音混合、解码和视觉词)的习得和泛化的影响,研究对象是四名很少或不会说话并使用高科技AAC的儿童。ALL应用程序由接受过虚拟培训的家长实施,研究人员远程监控其进展。社会效度数据也从父母那里收集。结果:所有的参与者都表现出在三个目标技能上的进步,以及在声音混合方面的泛化,效果大小从大到非常大。干预也很有效,仅在十周的指导下就取得了这些成果。考虑到每个参与者进入干预时知道的视觉单词少于10个,字母发音少于5个,这些进步是显著的。来自父母的感知数据也被共享。结论:未来的研究和实践应致力于提供基础和相关读写技能的同步教学,通过使用适应性和大量机会在有意义的共享读写经验的背景下应用技能,支持AAC用户的动机和参与,并使用家长实施的直接指导和明确的目标技能实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书