Raman spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool for glioma: protocol for a systematic review.

IF 3.9
Corneliu Ovidiu Vrancianu, Marian Necula, Eduard Milea, Nicoleta Siminea, Roxana-Elena Cristian, Alice Stoica, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc, Bogdan Oancea, Andrei Paun, Ion Petre, Mihaela Paun
{"title":"Raman spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool for glioma: protocol for a systematic review.","authors":"Corneliu Ovidiu Vrancianu, Marian Necula, Eduard Milea, Nicoleta Siminea, Roxana-Elena Cristian, Alice Stoica, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc, Bogdan Oancea, Andrei Paun, Ion Petre, Mihaela Paun","doi":"10.1186/s41512-026-00226-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor, demanding prompt and accurate diagnosis to guide therapy decisions. Conventional diagnostic methods such as histopathology and neuroimaging are limited by their invasiveness, subjectivity, or lack of intraoperative precision. Raman spectroscopy is an emerging, label-free optical technique that detects the unique molecular \"fingerprint\" of tissues, enabling real-time differentiation between tumor-infiltrated and normal brains based on their biochemical composition. Despite a growing body of experimental and translational studies, a comprehensive synthesis of Raman spectroscopy's clinical applicability in detecting glioma micro-infiltration is lacking. METHODS: We will search four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) for English-language studies published from 2015 to 2025. Eligible studies may use in vivo Raman (subjects with suspected or histologically confirmed glioma), ex vivo Raman (freshly excised human tissue), or in vitro analysis on archived human samples, provided the tissue originated from confirmed glioma cases. Primary outcomes will be diagnostic accuracy measures, including but not limited to sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under de curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR−). Secondary outcomes include its role in intraoperative margin assessment, diagnostic time, and machine learning-assisted classification. Data traction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed using specific statistics where applicable. If a meta-analysis is not feasible, a structured narrative synthesis will be employed, following the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) guidelines. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) will be applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence. The review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. DISCUSSION: This review will synthesize the emerging diagnostic landscape of Raman spectroscopy for glioma, positioning it as a transformative adjunct to traditional histopathology and intraoperative decision-making. Our findings will pave the way for a translational roadmap to integrate real-time Raman spectroscopy into neurosurgical workflows with machine learning support. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD420251025922. </p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13055004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-026-00226-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor, demanding prompt and accurate diagnosis to guide therapy decisions. Conventional diagnostic methods such as histopathology and neuroimaging are limited by their invasiveness, subjectivity, or lack of intraoperative precision. Raman spectroscopy is an emerging, label-free optical technique that detects the unique molecular "fingerprint" of tissues, enabling real-time differentiation between tumor-infiltrated and normal brains based on their biochemical composition. Despite a growing body of experimental and translational studies, a comprehensive synthesis of Raman spectroscopy's clinical applicability in detecting glioma micro-infiltration is lacking. METHODS: We will search four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) for English-language studies published from 2015 to 2025. Eligible studies may use in vivo Raman (subjects with suspected or histologically confirmed glioma), ex vivo Raman (freshly excised human tissue), or in vitro analysis on archived human samples, provided the tissue originated from confirmed glioma cases. Primary outcomes will be diagnostic accuracy measures, including but not limited to sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under de curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR−). Secondary outcomes include its role in intraoperative margin assessment, diagnostic time, and machine learning-assisted classification. Data traction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed using specific statistics where applicable. If a meta-analysis is not feasible, a structured narrative synthesis will be employed, following the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) guidelines. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) will be applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence. The review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. DISCUSSION: This review will synthesize the emerging diagnostic landscape of Raman spectroscopy for glioma, positioning it as a transformative adjunct to traditional histopathology and intraoperative decision-making. Our findings will pave the way for a translational roadmap to integrate real-time Raman spectroscopy into neurosurgical workflows with machine learning support. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD420251025922.

拉曼光谱作为神经胶质瘤的诊断工具:系统评价方案。
背景:神经胶质瘤是最常见的原发性脑肿瘤,需要及时准确的诊断来指导治疗决策。传统的诊断方法,如组织病理学和神经影像学,由于其侵入性、主观性或术中缺乏准确性而受到限制。拉曼光谱是一种新兴的无标记光学技术,可以检测组织的独特分子“指纹”,根据其生化成分实时区分肿瘤浸润和正常大脑。尽管有越来越多的实验和转化研究,但拉曼光谱在检测胶质瘤微浸润方面的临床适用性还缺乏全面的综合。方法:我们将检索四个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science),检索2015年至2025年发表的英语研究。符合条件的研究可以使用体内拉曼(疑似或组织学上证实的胶质瘤患者)、离体拉曼(新鲜切除的人体组织)或对存档的人类样本进行体外分析,前提是这些组织来自确诊的胶质瘤病例。主要结果将是诊断准确性指标,包括但不限于敏感性、特异性、准确性、曲线下面积(AUC)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、诊断优势比(DOR)和阳性/阴性似然比(LR+/LR−)。次要结果包括其在术中切缘评估、诊断时间和机器学习辅助分类中的作用。数据牵引和偏倚风险评估将由两名审稿人独立进行。荟萃分析将在适用的情况下使用特定的统计数据进行。如果荟萃分析不可行,则采用结构化叙事综合,遵循SWiM(无荟萃分析的综合)指南。GRADE(建议、评估、发展和评估的分级)将用于评估证据的确定性。该评价将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目。讨论:本综述将综合新兴的神经胶质瘤拉曼光谱诊断前景,将其定位为传统组织病理学和术中决策的变革性辅助手段。我们的研究结果将为将实时拉曼光谱整合到具有机器学习支持的神经外科工作流程的转化路线图铺平道路。系统评价注册:prospero: crd420251025922。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书