Developing a national strategy to support implementation of reablement for community-dwelling people living with dementia.

IF 3.3
Claire Mc O'Connor, Sasha Houlden, Christopher J Poulos, Michele Callisaya, Angela Collins, Kylie Miskovski, Glenys Petrie, John Quinn, Natalie Taylor, Susan Kurrle, Kaarin J Anstey
{"title":"Developing a national strategy to support implementation of reablement for community-dwelling people living with dementia.","authors":"Claire Mc O'Connor, Sasha Houlden, Christopher J Poulos, Michele Callisaya, Angela Collins, Kylie Miskovski, Glenys Petrie, John Quinn, Natalie Taylor, Susan Kurrle, Kaarin J Anstey","doi":"10.1186/s43058-026-00917-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia reablement is globally recommended to support people living with dementia to maximise their independence. Despite this, dementia reablement is not broadly available and there is currently no consensus around how it should be implemented. This study aimed to develop a national strategy by reaching expert consensus on the barriers, enablers, and potential implementation strategies to promote uptake of evidence-informed dementia reablement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified online Delphi survey process was used to gain national consensus on the determinants and implementation strategies pertaining to implementing community-based dementia reablement in Australia. Purposive sampling and snowballing were used to recruit a range of knowledge and experience-based expert interest holders, including people living with dementia, informal/family carers, allied health professionals, program managers/referrers, policy makers, experts and thought leaders. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), round one sought consensus around a range of determinants (i.e. barriers and enablers) to implementing reablement for community dwelling people living with dementia across four domains: (1) the system, (2) service providers, (3) family, and (4) the person living with dementia. Using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies compilation, round two sought consensus on a range of implementation strategies, presented across the same four domains. Across each domain in both survey rounds, participants were invited to provide written comments to supplement their ratings. Consensus for inclusion of each item was defined as ≥ 70% agreement across experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty participants completed the round one survey, and n = 35 (70%) participants completed round two. In round one, a range of determinants (barriers (n = 11) and enablers (n = 17)) for implementing community-based dementia reablement reached consensus. In round two, n = 28 implementation strategies reached consensus. Taken together, outcomes from this Delphi process highlight four key themes relating to the implementation of dementia reablement: (1) education and promotion, (2) engaging consumers and providing support to carers and people living with dementia, (3) service provider capacity to deliver reablement, and (4) funding, policy, and access to services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effectively implementing dementia reablement will take a sector-wide approach that involves top-down and bottom-up support, focuses on education and promotion of reablement, and leverages policy and funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13104390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00917-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia reablement is globally recommended to support people living with dementia to maximise their independence. Despite this, dementia reablement is not broadly available and there is currently no consensus around how it should be implemented. This study aimed to develop a national strategy by reaching expert consensus on the barriers, enablers, and potential implementation strategies to promote uptake of evidence-informed dementia reablement.

Methods: A modified online Delphi survey process was used to gain national consensus on the determinants and implementation strategies pertaining to implementing community-based dementia reablement in Australia. Purposive sampling and snowballing were used to recruit a range of knowledge and experience-based expert interest holders, including people living with dementia, informal/family carers, allied health professionals, program managers/referrers, policy makers, experts and thought leaders. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), round one sought consensus around a range of determinants (i.e. barriers and enablers) to implementing reablement for community dwelling people living with dementia across four domains: (1) the system, (2) service providers, (3) family, and (4) the person living with dementia. Using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies compilation, round two sought consensus on a range of implementation strategies, presented across the same four domains. Across each domain in both survey rounds, participants were invited to provide written comments to supplement their ratings. Consensus for inclusion of each item was defined as ≥ 70% agreement across experts.

Results: Fifty participants completed the round one survey, and n = 35 (70%) participants completed round two. In round one, a range of determinants (barriers (n = 11) and enablers (n = 17)) for implementing community-based dementia reablement reached consensus. In round two, n = 28 implementation strategies reached consensus. Taken together, outcomes from this Delphi process highlight four key themes relating to the implementation of dementia reablement: (1) education and promotion, (2) engaging consumers and providing support to carers and people living with dementia, (3) service provider capacity to deliver reablement, and (4) funding, policy, and access to services.

Conclusions: Effectively implementing dementia reablement will take a sector-wide approach that involves top-down and bottom-up support, focuses on education and promotion of reablement, and leverages policy and funding.

制定一项国家战略,支持为居住在社区的痴呆症患者提供康复服务。
背景:全球推荐痴呆症治疗,以支持痴呆症患者最大限度地提高其独立性。尽管如此,痴呆症的治疗还没有得到广泛的应用,目前也没有就如何实施痴呆症治疗达成共识。本研究旨在通过就障碍、推动因素和潜在实施策略达成专家共识,制定一项国家战略,以促进循证痴呆治疗的采用。方法:采用改进的在线德尔菲调查过程,就澳大利亚实施社区痴呆症治疗的决定因素和实施策略获得全国共识。有目的抽样和滚雪球法用于招募一系列以知识和经验为基础的专家利益持有人,包括痴呆症患者、非正式/家庭照顾者、专职卫生专业人员、方案经理/转诊者、决策者、专家和思想领袖。利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR),第一轮围绕一系列决定因素(即障碍和推动因素)寻求共识,以便在四个领域为社区居住的痴呆症患者实施实现:(1)系统,(2)服务提供者,(3)家庭和(4)痴呆症患者。利用实施变革的专家建议(ERIC)战略汇编,第二轮在一系列实施战略上寻求共识,这些战略跨越相同的四个领域。在两轮调查中,每个领域的参与者都被邀请提供书面评论来补充他们的评分。每个项目纳入的共识定义为专家之间的共识≥70%。结果:50名参与者完成了第一轮调查,n = 35(70%)参与者完成了第二轮调查。在第一轮中,实施社区痴呆症治疗的一系列决定因素(障碍(n = 11)和推动因素(n = 17))达成了共识。在第二轮中,n = 28个实施策略达成共识。综上所述,德尔菲过程的结果突出了与痴呆症治疗实施相关的四个关键主题:(1)教育和推广;(2)吸引消费者并向护理人员和痴呆症患者提供支持;(3)服务提供商提供治疗的能力;(4)资金、政策和服务获取。结论:有效实施痴呆症治疗将采取全部门的方法,包括自上而下和自下而上的支持,注重教育和促进治疗,并利用政策和资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书