Muscle edema of the rotator cuff: a systematic review of characteristics and associated pathologies from the LaTour group.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jeanni Zbinden, Kinga Michalewska, Sean Wl Ho, Marko Nabergoj, Mohamed Ibrahim, Joe Chih-Hao Chiu, Xue Ling Chong, Brigitte Von Rechenberg, Alexandre Lädermann
{"title":"Muscle edema of the rotator cuff: a systematic review of characteristics and associated pathologies from the LaTour group.","authors":"Jeanni Zbinden, Kinga Michalewska, Sean Wl Ho, Marko Nabergoj, Mohamed Ibrahim, Joe Chih-Hao Chiu, Xue Ling Chong, Brigitte Von Rechenberg, Alexandre Lädermann","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2025-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the characteristics, diagnostic methods, and etiologies of rotator cuff (RC) muscle edema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant review of clinical and laboratory studies from PubMed and Embase (PROSPERO ID: 626276); data on edema location, imaging features, and associated pathologies were qualitatively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI is the most consistent tool for detecting muscle edema, typically showing T2 hyperintensity with variable patterns depending on etiology (traumatic, neurogenic, exertional, myopathic, or iatrogenic). Traumatic edema is associated with tendon retraction, bursal effusion, and fatty infiltration; neurogenic edema is diffuse and symmetric with atrophy; exertional edema appears 'fluffy' or 'feather-like'; myopathic and iatrogenic forms show peripheral or localized changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The imaging appearance, location, and timing of RC muscle edema provide valuable diagnostic clues and should be considered in the context of the underlying pathology.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Systematic review, level 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"11 4","pages":"338-348"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13087873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2025-0096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the characteristics, diagnostic methods, and etiologies of rotator cuff (RC) muscle edema.

Methods: A PRISMA-compliant review of clinical and laboratory studies from PubMed and Embase (PROSPERO ID: 626276); data on edema location, imaging features, and associated pathologies were qualitatively synthesized.

Results: MRI is the most consistent tool for detecting muscle edema, typically showing T2 hyperintensity with variable patterns depending on etiology (traumatic, neurogenic, exertional, myopathic, or iatrogenic). Traumatic edema is associated with tendon retraction, bursal effusion, and fatty infiltration; neurogenic edema is diffuse and symmetric with atrophy; exertional edema appears 'fluffy' or 'feather-like'; myopathic and iatrogenic forms show peripheral or localized changes.

Conclusion: The imaging appearance, location, and timing of RC muscle edema provide valuable diagnostic clues and should be considered in the context of the underlying pathology.

Level of evidence: Systematic review, level 4.

肩袖肌肉水肿:LaTour组的特征和相关病理的系统回顾。
目的:系统回顾肩袖(RC)肌肉水肿的特点、诊断方法和病因。方法:对PubMed和Embase (PROSPERO ID: 626276)的临床和实验室研究进行prisma合规审查;我们定性地综合了水肿位置、影像学特征和相关病理的数据。结果:MRI是检测肌肉水肿最一致的工具,通常显示T2高强度,根据病因(外伤性、神经源性、运动性、肌病性或医源性)而有不同的模式。外伤性水肿与肌腱缩回、法囊积液和脂肪浸润有关;神经源性水肿呈弥漫性对称性,伴萎缩;劳力性水肿呈“蓬松”或“羽毛状”;肌病和医源性形式表现为外周或局部改变。结论:RC肌水肿的影像学表现、部位和时间提供了有价值的诊断线索,应结合基础病理进行考虑。证据等级:系统评价,4级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书