Racial and Ethnic Representation Reporting in Orthopaedic Research.

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ahmad A Alnasser, Tim Kobes, Marilyn Heng
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Representation Reporting in Orthopaedic Research.","authors":"Ahmad A Alnasser, Tim Kobes, Marilyn Heng","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthopaedic research informs clinical practice, making it critical to collect data that reflect diverse patient demographics, including race and ethnicity. Despite the importance of these variables in addressing healthcare disparities, race and ethnicity are often underreported in orthopaedic studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting in high-impact orthopaedic journals and identify trends based on study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original research published between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (CORR), Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (JOT) was compiled for analysis. Data on publication date, study type, level of evidence, country, and demographic variables were collected. Reporting rates were compared with the US Census 2020 diversity index and the Historical Index for Ethnic Fractionalization for global reporting, creating a performance ratio (PR) to quantify underreporting or overreporting based on geographic diversity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1452 studies, 89.2% reported sex and 86.5% reported age, but only 18.9% included race and 6.1% included ethnicity. Reporting was highest in Level II studies (29.3% race, 10.2% ethnicity) and cross-sectional studies (31.0% race, 11.2% ethnicity). United States-based studies reported race and ethnicity more frequently (28.0%), with the highest PR in Hawaii, New Hampshire, and Washington DC. Internationally, Japan, Thailand, and Finland had the highest PR. Reporting varied by journal, with CORR leading in race reporting (23.9%) and JOT in ethnicity (8.0%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Race and ethnicity are markedly underreported in orthopaedic research. Addressing this disparity through standardized guidelines and enforcement mechanisms is essential to improve research quality and identify healthcare inequities. Additional exploration of these variables can better characterize diverse patient populations and inform clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13034967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic research informs clinical practice, making it critical to collect data that reflect diverse patient demographics, including race and ethnicity. Despite the importance of these variables in addressing healthcare disparities, race and ethnicity are often underreported in orthopaedic studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting in high-impact orthopaedic journals and identify trends based on study characteristics.

Methods: Original research published between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (CORR), Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (JOT) was compiled for analysis. Data on publication date, study type, level of evidence, country, and demographic variables were collected. Reporting rates were compared with the US Census 2020 diversity index and the Historical Index for Ethnic Fractionalization for global reporting, creating a performance ratio (PR) to quantify underreporting or overreporting based on geographic diversity.

Results: Among 1452 studies, 89.2% reported sex and 86.5% reported age, but only 18.9% included race and 6.1% included ethnicity. Reporting was highest in Level II studies (29.3% race, 10.2% ethnicity) and cross-sectional studies (31.0% race, 11.2% ethnicity). United States-based studies reported race and ethnicity more frequently (28.0%), with the highest PR in Hawaii, New Hampshire, and Washington DC. Internationally, Japan, Thailand, and Finland had the highest PR. Reporting varied by journal, with CORR leading in race reporting (23.9%) and JOT in ethnicity (8.0%).

Discussion: Race and ethnicity are markedly underreported in orthopaedic research. Addressing this disparity through standardized guidelines and enforcement mechanisms is essential to improve research quality and identify healthcare inequities. Additional exploration of these variables can better characterize diverse patient populations and inform clinical practice.

骨科研究中的种族和民族代表性报告。
导读:骨科研究为临床实践提供信息,因此收集反映不同患者人口统计数据(包括种族和民族)至关重要。尽管这些变量在解决医疗保健差异方面很重要,但在骨科研究中,种族和民族往往被低估。本研究的目的是评估高影响力骨科期刊中种族和民族报道的频率,并根据研究特征确定趋势。方法:收集2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日发表在《临床骨科与相关研究》(CORR)、《骨与关节外科杂志》(Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery)和《骨科创伤杂志》(Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma)上的原创研究成果进行分析。收集出版日期、研究类型、证据水平、国家和人口变量的数据。报告率与美国2020年人口普查多样性指数和全球报告的种族分化历史指数进行了比较,创建了一个绩效比率(PR),以量化基于地理多样性的低报或高报。结果:1452项研究中,89.2%的研究报告了性别,86.5%的研究报告了年龄,但只有18.9%的研究报告了种族,6.1%的研究报告了民族。报告率最高的是二级研究(29.3%种族,10.2%种族)和横断面研究(31.0%种族,11.2%种族)。基于美国的研究更频繁地报告种族和民族(28.0%),夏威夷、新罕布什尔和华盛顿特区的PR最高。在国际上,日本、泰国和芬兰的PR最高。报告因期刊而异,CORR在种族报告中领先(23.9%),而JOT在种族报告中领先(8.0%)。讨论:种族和民族在骨科研究中被明显低估。通过标准化的指导方针和执行机制来解决这一差异,对于提高研究质量和确定医疗保健不公平现象至关重要。对这些变量的进一步探索可以更好地描述不同的患者群体,并为临床实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书