Anthropometry-adjusted TyG indices improve insulin resistance estimation: an exploratory euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp study in Japanese adults without diabetes.
{"title":"Anthropometry-adjusted TyG indices improve insulin resistance estimation: an exploratory euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp study in Japanese adults without diabetes.","authors":"Natsu Otowa-Suematsu, Tomoaki Nakamura, Hiroshi Miura, Tomoko Yamada, Marika Nishisaka, Hayato Fukumitsu, Yukari Katsura, Yasuko Morita, Shun-Ichiro Asahara, Kazuhiko Sakaguchi","doi":"10.1007/s13340-026-00883-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the diagnostic performance of anthropometry-adjusted triglyceride-glucose (TyG)-derived indices for assessing insulin resistance (IR) in Japanese adults without diabetes, using the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (EHC) as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 61 Japanese individuals without diabetes underwent insulin sensitivity assessment using the gold standard EHC. IR was defined as an insulin sensitivity index (ISI) below the 25th percentile. Surrogate IR indices, including Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), the original TyG index, and anthropometry-adjusted TyG-derived indices (TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR), were calculated. Correlations between these indices and the ISI were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and linear regression were used to compare diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability. Pairwise DeLong tests were used to assess differences in the area under the curve (AUC) values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TyG-BMI and TyG-WHtR showed the stronger associations with ISI (ρ = - 0.544 and - 0.546, respectively) than both HOMA-IR and the original TyG index. TyG-BMI and TyG-WHtR had the highest AUCs (0.810 and 0.829, respectively) for identifying clamp-defined IR. The optimal cutoff value for HOMA-IR was approximately 2.5. The optimal cutoff for TyG-BMI was 203.7. Pairwise DeLong tests supported the higher diagnostic performance of selected anthropometry-adjusted TyG-derived indices compared with conventional markers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anthropometry-adjusted TyG-derived indices, particularly TyG-BMI and TyG-WHtR, showed strong associations with IR as assessed by the gold standard EHC in Japanese adults without diabetes. These findings suggest that these indices may serve as practical surrogate markers for IR in settings where direct clamp measurements are not feasible.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-026-00883-9.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"17 2","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13050668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-026-00883-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of anthropometry-adjusted triglyceride-glucose (TyG)-derived indices for assessing insulin resistance (IR) in Japanese adults without diabetes, using the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (EHC) as the reference standard.
Methods: A total of 61 Japanese individuals without diabetes underwent insulin sensitivity assessment using the gold standard EHC. IR was defined as an insulin sensitivity index (ISI) below the 25th percentile. Surrogate IR indices, including Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), the original TyG index, and anthropometry-adjusted TyG-derived indices (TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR), were calculated. Correlations between these indices and the ISI were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and linear regression were used to compare diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability. Pairwise DeLong tests were used to assess differences in the area under the curve (AUC) values.
Results: TyG-BMI and TyG-WHtR showed the stronger associations with ISI (ρ = - 0.544 and - 0.546, respectively) than both HOMA-IR and the original TyG index. TyG-BMI and TyG-WHtR had the highest AUCs (0.810 and 0.829, respectively) for identifying clamp-defined IR. The optimal cutoff value for HOMA-IR was approximately 2.5. The optimal cutoff for TyG-BMI was 203.7. Pairwise DeLong tests supported the higher diagnostic performance of selected anthropometry-adjusted TyG-derived indices compared with conventional markers.
Conclusions: Anthropometry-adjusted TyG-derived indices, particularly TyG-BMI and TyG-WHtR, showed strong associations with IR as assessed by the gold standard EHC in Japanese adults without diabetes. These findings suggest that these indices may serve as practical surrogate markers for IR in settings where direct clamp measurements are not feasible.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-026-00883-9.
期刊介绍:
Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.