Clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Tran Vu Hoang Duong, Pham Anh Tuan, Phan Quang Son, Le Tan Bao, Phan Dinh Thanh, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
{"title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.","authors":"Tran Vu Hoang Duong, Pham Anh Tuan, Phan Quang Son, Le Tan Bao, Phan Dinh Thanh, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective single-center cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate 1-year clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (BE-PCF) in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>CSR is commonly managed with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc replacement, or posterior cervical foraminotomy. However, these approaches may lead to fusion-related complications, prosthesis degeneration, or posterior tension band disruption. Minimally invasive techniques, such as biportal endoscopic spine surgery, aim to reduce tissue damage while maintaining effective decompression. Long-term outcome data for BE-PCF remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one patients (31 levels) who underwent BE-PCF (June 2023-December 2024) were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at baseline, discharge, 6 months, and 1 year. Radiological outcomes were assessed using dynamic radiographs (C2C7 and segmental range of motion [ROM]) and computed tomography (CT) at 6 months, evaluating facet resection, foraminal diameter, and approach angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow-up was 14.8±6.7 months. VAS and NDI improved significantly (p<0.001). Neck pain decreased from 6.9±1.1 to 2.5±0.7, arm pain from 8.1±0.7 to 2.0±0.6, and NDI from 30.8±3.6 to 12.2±1.6. Cervical ROM was preserved (C2C7: 40.5°±10.1° vs. 40.5°±10.3°, p=0.99; segmental: 13.1°±4.4° vs. 13.8°±5.7°, p=0.18). CT demonstrated significant foraminal enlargement (mid-foraminal: 4.2±0.8 to 6.5±1.0 mm; distal: 3.7±1.1 to 4.8±1.0 mm; both p<0.001). Mean facet resection was 34.6%±7.7%, with no case exceeding 50%. Complications included transient C5 palsy (4.7%) and one wrong-level surgery (3.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BE-PCF is a safe and effective minimally invasive option for CSR, providing significant clinical improvement, preserved cervical motion, and adequate decompression with low complication rates at 1 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective single-center cohort study.

Purpose: To evaluate 1-year clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (BE-PCF) in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).

Overview of literature: CSR is commonly managed with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc replacement, or posterior cervical foraminotomy. However, these approaches may lead to fusion-related complications, prosthesis degeneration, or posterior tension band disruption. Minimally invasive techniques, such as biportal endoscopic spine surgery, aim to reduce tissue damage while maintaining effective decompression. Long-term outcome data for BE-PCF remain limited.

Methods: Twenty-one patients (31 levels) who underwent BE-PCF (June 2023-December 2024) were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at baseline, discharge, 6 months, and 1 year. Radiological outcomes were assessed using dynamic radiographs (C2C7 and segmental range of motion [ROM]) and computed tomography (CT) at 6 months, evaluating facet resection, foraminal diameter, and approach angle.

Results: Mean follow-up was 14.8±6.7 months. VAS and NDI improved significantly (p<0.001). Neck pain decreased from 6.9±1.1 to 2.5±0.7, arm pain from 8.1±0.7 to 2.0±0.6, and NDI from 30.8±3.6 to 12.2±1.6. Cervical ROM was preserved (C2C7: 40.5°±10.1° vs. 40.5°±10.3°, p=0.99; segmental: 13.1°±4.4° vs. 13.8°±5.7°, p=0.18). CT demonstrated significant foraminal enlargement (mid-foraminal: 4.2±0.8 to 6.5±1.0 mm; distal: 3.7±1.1 to 4.8±1.0 mm; both p<0.001). Mean facet resection was 34.6%±7.7%, with no case exceeding 50%. Complications included transient C5 palsy (4.7%) and one wrong-level surgery (3.2%).

Conclusions: BE-PCF is a safe and effective minimally invasive option for CSR, providing significant clinical improvement, preserved cervical motion, and adequate decompression with low complication rates at 1 year.

双门静脉内窥镜下颈后椎间孔切开术的临床和影像学结果:一项随访1年的单中心回顾性队列研究。
研究设计:回顾性单中心队列研究。目的:评价双门静脉内窥镜下颈椎后椎间孔切开术(BE-PCF)治疗神经根型颈椎病(CSR) 1年的临床和影像学结果。文献综述:CSR通常通过前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术、颈椎椎间盘置换术或后路颈椎椎间孔切开术来治疗。然而,这些入路可能导致融合相关并发症,假体退变或后张力带断裂。微创技术,如双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术,旨在减少组织损伤,同时保持有效的减压。BE-PCF的长期结果数据仍然有限。方法:回顾性分析2023年6月~ 2024年12月接受BE-PCF治疗的21例(31个级别)患者。临床结果包括基线、出院、6个月和1年时颈部和手臂疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。6个月时通过动态x线片(C2C7和节段活动范围[ROM])和计算机断层扫描(CT)评估放射学结果,评估小关节突切除术、椎间孔直径和入路角度。结果:平均随访14.8±6.7个月。结论:BE-PCF是一种安全有效的治疗CSR的微创选择,在1年内提供了显著的临床改善,保留了颈椎运动,充分的减压,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书