Clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.
Tran Vu Hoang Duong, Pham Anh Tuan, Phan Quang Son, Le Tan Bao, Phan Dinh Thanh, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
{"title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.","authors":"Tran Vu Hoang Duong, Pham Anh Tuan, Phan Quang Son, Le Tan Bao, Phan Dinh Thanh, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective single-center cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate 1-year clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (BE-PCF) in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>CSR is commonly managed with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc replacement, or posterior cervical foraminotomy. However, these approaches may lead to fusion-related complications, prosthesis degeneration, or posterior tension band disruption. Minimally invasive techniques, such as biportal endoscopic spine surgery, aim to reduce tissue damage while maintaining effective decompression. Long-term outcome data for BE-PCF remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one patients (31 levels) who underwent BE-PCF (June 2023-December 2024) were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at baseline, discharge, 6 months, and 1 year. Radiological outcomes were assessed using dynamic radiographs (C2C7 and segmental range of motion [ROM]) and computed tomography (CT) at 6 months, evaluating facet resection, foraminal diameter, and approach angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow-up was 14.8±6.7 months. VAS and NDI improved significantly (p<0.001). Neck pain decreased from 6.9±1.1 to 2.5±0.7, arm pain from 8.1±0.7 to 2.0±0.6, and NDI from 30.8±3.6 to 12.2±1.6. Cervical ROM was preserved (C2C7: 40.5°±10.1° vs. 40.5°±10.3°, p=0.99; segmental: 13.1°±4.4° vs. 13.8°±5.7°, p=0.18). CT demonstrated significant foraminal enlargement (mid-foraminal: 4.2±0.8 to 6.5±1.0 mm; distal: 3.7±1.1 to 4.8±1.0 mm; both p<0.001). Mean facet resection was 34.6%±7.7%, with no case exceeding 50%. Complications included transient C5 palsy (4.7%) and one wrong-level surgery (3.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BE-PCF is a safe and effective minimally invasive option for CSR, providing significant clinical improvement, preserved cervical motion, and adequate decompression with low complication rates at 1 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective single-center cohort study.
Purpose: To evaluate 1-year clinical and radiological outcomes of biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (BE-PCF) in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).
Overview of literature: CSR is commonly managed with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc replacement, or posterior cervical foraminotomy. However, these approaches may lead to fusion-related complications, prosthesis degeneration, or posterior tension band disruption. Minimally invasive techniques, such as biportal endoscopic spine surgery, aim to reduce tissue damage while maintaining effective decompression. Long-term outcome data for BE-PCF remain limited.
Methods: Twenty-one patients (31 levels) who underwent BE-PCF (June 2023-December 2024) were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at baseline, discharge, 6 months, and 1 year. Radiological outcomes were assessed using dynamic radiographs (C2C7 and segmental range of motion [ROM]) and computed tomography (CT) at 6 months, evaluating facet resection, foraminal diameter, and approach angle.
Results: Mean follow-up was 14.8±6.7 months. VAS and NDI improved significantly (p<0.001). Neck pain decreased from 6.9±1.1 to 2.5±0.7, arm pain from 8.1±0.7 to 2.0±0.6, and NDI from 30.8±3.6 to 12.2±1.6. Cervical ROM was preserved (C2C7: 40.5°±10.1° vs. 40.5°±10.3°, p=0.99; segmental: 13.1°±4.4° vs. 13.8°±5.7°, p=0.18). CT demonstrated significant foraminal enlargement (mid-foraminal: 4.2±0.8 to 6.5±1.0 mm; distal: 3.7±1.1 to 4.8±1.0 mm; both p<0.001). Mean facet resection was 34.6%±7.7%, with no case exceeding 50%. Complications included transient C5 palsy (4.7%) and one wrong-level surgery (3.2%).
Conclusions: BE-PCF is a safe and effective minimally invasive option for CSR, providing significant clinical improvement, preserved cervical motion, and adequate decompression with low complication rates at 1 year.