Thoracoscopic Mobilization and Intraoperative Internal Traction-A Novel Approach for Treatment of Long-gap Type C Esophageal Atresia with Distal Carinal Fistula.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Ludovica Magni, Chiara Barbera, Tobias G H Teunissen, Demi K Focke, Julia E Hut, Lucas F Townsend, Sarah K Rushforth, Arnold J N Bittermann, Johannes W Verweij, Maud Y A Lindeboom, Ellen M B P Reuling, Stefaan H A J Tytgat
{"title":"Thoracoscopic Mobilization and Intraoperative Internal Traction-A Novel Approach for Treatment of Long-gap Type C Esophageal Atresia with Distal Carinal Fistula.","authors":"Ludovica Magni, Chiara Barbera, Tobias G H Teunissen, Demi K Focke, Julia E Hut, Lucas F Townsend, Sarah K Rushforth, Arnold J N Bittermann, Johannes W Verweij, Maud Y A Lindeboom, Ellen M B P Reuling, Stefaan H A J Tytgat","doi":"10.1055/a-2844-1481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is challenging due to the substantial distance between the proximal and distal esophageal pouches. Traditionally, it includes Gross types A and B, while inclusion of long-gap type C cases remains debated. In type C esophageal atresia (EA), the distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) varies in location; when situated at the carina, the effective pouch distance may be markedly increased, making it one of the most complex anatomical subtypes.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We hypothesized that early primary anastomosis in type C with carinal fistula (TEFC) is feasible using thoracoscopic mobilization and intraoperative internal traction, and aimed to compare outcomes with type C cases where the TEF is higher on the tracheal wall (TEFT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 134 EA patients treated thoracoscopically at the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital in Utrecht between 2012 and 2024, including 25 TEFC and 109 TEFT patients. TEF location was determined by perioperative tracheobronchoscopy, and the surgical approach was tailored accordingly. TEFC patients underwent thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization with intraoperative internal traction, while TEFT patients received conventional primary thoracoscopic anastomosis. Primary outcomes were early successful anastomosis, preservation of the native esophagus, and anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity and clinical results during childhood.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent successful thoracoscopic repair shortly after birth, without requiring esophageal replacement. In the TEFC group, single-stage anastomosis was achieved in 23 patients; two required temporary external traction followed by delayed repair. TEFC patients showed higher rates of anastomotic leakage (40% vs. 20.2%), recurrent stenosis (24% vs. 10.1%), and need for anti-reflux surgery (26.1% vs. 11.3%). Early feeding difficulties affected weight gain in both groups, with 10 to 20% underweight at 6 to 12 months and no significant group difference. By 5.5 years, growth improved markedly, with no TEFC patients and 8.6% of TEFT patients remaining underweight.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although TEFC represents a more complex subgroup with higher complication rates, early thoracoscopic anastomosis with preservation of the native esophagus is achievable in these long-gap type C patients. Routine tracheobronchoscopy may support accurate classification and optimized surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2844-1481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is challenging due to the substantial distance between the proximal and distal esophageal pouches. Traditionally, it includes Gross types A and B, while inclusion of long-gap type C cases remains debated. In type C esophageal atresia (EA), the distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) varies in location; when situated at the carina, the effective pouch distance may be markedly increased, making it one of the most complex anatomical subtypes.

Introduction: We hypothesized that early primary anastomosis in type C with carinal fistula (TEFC) is feasible using thoracoscopic mobilization and intraoperative internal traction, and aimed to compare outcomes with type C cases where the TEF is higher on the tracheal wall (TEFT).

Materials and methods: We analyzed 134 EA patients treated thoracoscopically at the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital in Utrecht between 2012 and 2024, including 25 TEFC and 109 TEFT patients. TEF location was determined by perioperative tracheobronchoscopy, and the surgical approach was tailored accordingly. TEFC patients underwent thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization with intraoperative internal traction, while TEFT patients received conventional primary thoracoscopic anastomosis. Primary outcomes were early successful anastomosis, preservation of the native esophagus, and anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity and clinical results during childhood.

Results: All patients underwent successful thoracoscopic repair shortly after birth, without requiring esophageal replacement. In the TEFC group, single-stage anastomosis was achieved in 23 patients; two required temporary external traction followed by delayed repair. TEFC patients showed higher rates of anastomotic leakage (40% vs. 20.2%), recurrent stenosis (24% vs. 10.1%), and need for anti-reflux surgery (26.1% vs. 11.3%). Early feeding difficulties affected weight gain in both groups, with 10 to 20% underweight at 6 to 12 months and no significant group difference. By 5.5 years, growth improved markedly, with no TEFC patients and 8.6% of TEFT patients remaining underweight.

Conclusion: Although TEFC represents a more complex subgroup with higher complication rates, early thoracoscopic anastomosis with preservation of the native esophagus is achievable in these long-gap type C patients. Routine tracheobronchoscopy may support accurate classification and optimized surgical planning.

胸腔镜下活动及术中内牵引——治疗长间隙C型食管闭锁伴隆突远端瘘的新方法。
长间隙食管闭锁(LGEA)是具有挑战性的,因为近端和远端食管袋之间的距离很大。传统上,它包括总A型和B型,而包括长间隙C型病例仍存在争议。C型食管闭锁(EA),远端气管食管瘘(TEF)位置不同;当位于隆突时,有效袋距可显着增加,使其成为最复杂的解剖亚型之一。我们假设通过胸腔镜下的动员和术中牵引,早期一期吻合C型隆突瘘(TEFC)是可行的,目的是与气管壁上TEF较高的C型病例(TEFT)的结果进行比较。方法分析2012年至2024年在乌得勒支Wilhelmina儿童医院接受胸腔镜治疗的134例EA患者,其中TEFC患者25例,TEFT患者109例。围手术期气管支气管镜检查确定TEF位置,并相应地调整手术入路。TEFC患者行胸腔镜食管动员术并术中内牵引,TEFT患者行常规一期胸腔镜吻合。主要结果是早期吻合成功,保留原有食道和吻合口漏。次要结局包括术后发病率和儿童时期的临床结果。结果所有患者均在出生后不久成功行胸腔镜修复,无需食道置换术。TEFC组23例患者实现单期吻合;2例需要临时外牵引,随后延迟修复。TEFC患者的吻合口漏率(40%比20.2%)、狭窄复发率(24%比10.1%)和需要抗反流手术(26.1%比11.3%)较高。早期喂养困难影响两组的体重增加,6-12月龄体重不足10-20%,组间无显著差异。到5.5年时,生长明显改善,没有TEFC患者,8.6%的TEFT患者仍然体重不足。结论虽然TEFC是一个更复杂的亚组,并发症发生率更高,但在这些长间隙C型患者中,早期胸腔镜吻合保留原有食管是可以实现的。常规气管支气管镜检查有助于准确分类和优化手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书