Epidemiology, Patient Characteristics, Real-World Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Utilization and Spending for Patients with Multifocal Motor Neuropathy: A US Claims-Based Analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2026-04-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.158137
Nikhil Khandelwal, Caroline Geremakis, Faisal Riaz, Gina Ryan, Vishal Saundankar, Richard Sheer, Brandon Suehs
{"title":"Epidemiology, Patient Characteristics, Real-World Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Utilization and Spending for Patients with Multifocal Motor Neuropathy: A US Claims-Based Analysis.","authors":"Nikhil Khandelwal, Caroline Geremakis, Faisal Riaz, Gina Ryan, Vishal Saundankar, Richard Sheer, Brandon Suehs","doi":"10.36469/001c.158137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, progressive neurological disease characterized by asymmetrical limb weakness. The real-world healthcare burden of MMN is not well established.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare spending associated with MMN in patients in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational claims study extracted data from the Humana Healthcare Research Database, comprising US Medicare Advantage plan members. Eligible patients were aged 18-89 years, had ≥2 nondiagnostic medical claims (the first being the index date) associated with an MMN diagnosis code (January 1, 2017-June 30, 2022), and continuous enrollment for 12 months pre-index (baseline) and post-index (follow-up). Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy, or immunosuppressant use were excluded. Outcomes were assessed during the baseline and follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deidentified data were extracted for 248 patients with MMN. Median (Q1, Q3) age at index was 70.0 (62.0, 77.0) years; most patients were male (53.6%) and White (78.2%). Diagnostic procedures included (baseline/follow-up periods) spinal magnetic resonance imaging (21.4%/18.1%), nerve conduction studies (19.8%/14.5%), and electromyography (17.7%/15.3%). Anticonvulsants, pain medications, corticosteroids, and central muscle relaxants were the most commonly used medications. Overall, 5.2% of patients had intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) during follow-up. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) time from index to IVIG initiation was 63.1 (52.2) days, with 6.5 (5.4) administrations, 28.7 (22.9) days between administrations, and 147.5 (133.9) days of total treatment. For all-cause HCRU, 23.8% of patients had ≥1 inpatient stay in the baseline period, with mean (SD) length of stay of 12.7 (14.5) days; during follow-up, 27.8% of patients had ≥1 inpatient stay (length of stay, 13.4 [16.2] days). During the baseline/follow-up periods, 43.1%/46.8% of patients had ≥1 emergency department visit, and 18.5%/28.6% used telehealth services. Median all-cause spending (baseline/follow-up) was <math><mn>11</mn> <mrow><mo> </mo></mrow> <mn>299</mn> <mrow><mo>/</mo></mrow> </math> 16 074 for total healthcare, <math><mn>6745</mn> <mrow><mo>/</mo></mrow> </math> 10 630 for medical resources, and <math><mn>1374</mn> <mrow><mo>/</mo></mrow> </math> 1701 for pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Further studies are needed to enhance our understanding of the real-world diagnostic and treatment patterns associated with MMN and to determine long-term clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These real-world data highlighted the considerable burden associated with MMN on the healthcare system and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"111-119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13050543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.158137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, progressive neurological disease characterized by asymmetrical limb weakness. The real-world healthcare burden of MMN is not well established.

Objectives: To characterize the epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare spending associated with MMN in patients in the US.

Methods: This retrospective, observational claims study extracted data from the Humana Healthcare Research Database, comprising US Medicare Advantage plan members. Eligible patients were aged 18-89 years, had ≥2 nondiagnostic medical claims (the first being the index date) associated with an MMN diagnosis code (January 1, 2017-June 30, 2022), and continuous enrollment for 12 months pre-index (baseline) and post-index (follow-up). Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy, or immunosuppressant use were excluded. Outcomes were assessed during the baseline and follow-up periods.

Results: Deidentified data were extracted for 248 patients with MMN. Median (Q1, Q3) age at index was 70.0 (62.0, 77.0) years; most patients were male (53.6%) and White (78.2%). Diagnostic procedures included (baseline/follow-up periods) spinal magnetic resonance imaging (21.4%/18.1%), nerve conduction studies (19.8%/14.5%), and electromyography (17.7%/15.3%). Anticonvulsants, pain medications, corticosteroids, and central muscle relaxants were the most commonly used medications. Overall, 5.2% of patients had intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) during follow-up. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) time from index to IVIG initiation was 63.1 (52.2) days, with 6.5 (5.4) administrations, 28.7 (22.9) days between administrations, and 147.5 (133.9) days of total treatment. For all-cause HCRU, 23.8% of patients had ≥1 inpatient stay in the baseline period, with mean (SD) length of stay of 12.7 (14.5) days; during follow-up, 27.8% of patients had ≥1 inpatient stay (length of stay, 13.4 [16.2] days). During the baseline/follow-up periods, 43.1%/46.8% of patients had ≥1 emergency department visit, and 18.5%/28.6% used telehealth services. Median all-cause spending (baseline/follow-up) was 11 299 / 16 074 for total healthcare, 6745 / 10 630 for medical resources, and 1374 / 1701 for pharmacy.

Discussion: Further studies are needed to enhance our understanding of the real-world diagnostic and treatment patterns associated with MMN and to determine long-term clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: These real-world data highlighted the considerable burden associated with MMN on the healthcare system and patients.

多灶性运动神经病患者的流行病学、患者特征、现实世界治疗模式、医疗保健利用和支出:一项基于美国索赔的分析。
背景:多灶性运动神经病(MMN)是一种罕见的进行性神经系统疾病,以不对称肢体无力为特征。现实世界中MMN的医疗负担尚未得到很好的确定。目的:表征美国MMN患者的流行病学、诊断程序、治疗模式、医疗资源利用(HCRU)和医疗支出。方法:这项回顾性、观察性索赔研究从Humana医疗保健研究数据库中提取数据,包括美国医疗保险优势计划成员。符合条件的患者年龄为18-89岁,有≥2个与MMN诊断代码(2017年1月1日- 2022年6月30日)相关的非诊断性医疗索赔(第一个是索引日期),并且连续入组12个月,在索引前(基线)和索引后(随访)。排除肌萎缩性侧索硬化症、慢性炎症性脱髓鞘神经病变或使用免疫抑制剂的患者。在基线和随访期间评估结果。结果:提取了248例MMN患者的鉴定资料。指数年龄中位数(Q1, Q3)为70.0(62.0,77.0)岁;男性占53.6%,白人占78.2%。诊断程序包括(基线/随访期间)脊髓磁共振成像(21.4%/18.1%)、神经传导检查(19.8%/14.5%)和肌电图(17.7%/15.3%)。抗惊厥药、止痛药、皮质类固醇和中枢肌肉松弛剂是最常用的药物。总体而言,5.2%的患者在随访期间静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)。从指数到IVIG启动的平均(标准差[SD])时间为63.1(52.2)天,给药6.5(5.4)次,两次给药之间28.7(22.9)天,总治疗147.5(133.9)天。对于全因HCRU, 23.8%的患者在基线期住院≥1次,平均(SD)住院时间为12.7(14.5)天;随访期间,27.8%的患者住院时间≥1次(住院时间13.4[16.2]天)。在基线/随访期间,43.1%/46.8%的患者就诊≥1次急诊科,18.5%/28.6%的患者使用远程医疗服务。全因支出中位数(基线/随访)为:总医疗保健支出为11299 / 16074,医疗资源支出为6745 / 10630,药房支出为1374 / 1701。讨论:需要进一步的研究来加强我们对与MMN相关的现实世界诊断和治疗模式的理解,并确定长期临床结果。结论:这些真实世界的数据突出了MMN对医疗保健系统和患者的相当大的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书