Expanding the Practice of Day-Case Inguinal, Femoral and Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Review of Patient and Procedural Factors Facilitating and Precluding Same-Day Discharge

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2026-09-24 Epub Date: 2026-04-06 DOI:10.1111/ans.70667
Minh T. Calder, Elise J. Ho, Simon K. Ho, Shiran Wijeratne
{"title":"Expanding the Practice of Day-Case Inguinal, Femoral and Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Review of Patient and Procedural Factors Facilitating and Precluding Same-Day Discharge","authors":"Minh T. Calder,&nbsp;Elise J. Ho,&nbsp;Simon K. Ho,&nbsp;Shiran Wijeratne","doi":"10.1111/ans.70667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the advantages of lower healthcare costs and decreased elective surgery wait times without compromise to patient outcome, rates of day-case hernia repairs remain much lower than the RACS target of 70%–80%. Certain patient cohorts are often unnecessarily excluded due to perceived risks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To review literature on patient and procedural factors influencing same-day discharge after inguinal, femoral, and umbilical hernia repairs, and to outline an evidence-based selection criteria and perioperative protocol to improve day-case rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review of peer-reviewed English-language studies involving inguinal, umbilical, and femoral hernia repairs in patients over 18 years, in day and overnight case settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patient factors facilitating same-day discharge are age under 65 years, ASA grades I–II, and uncomplicated hernia types. Selected patients aged over 65 or with ASA grades III–IV may be appropriate candidates and should not be excluded by default. Procedural factors facilitating same-day discharge include unilateral surgery, use of adjunctive local anaesthesia, and protocols to reduce risk of common postoperative complications. Logistical factors such as comprehensive discharge planning and strategic theatre scheduling can further increase the success of day-cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>For appropriately selected patients, aged up to 80 years and ASA up to IV, day-case hernia repair can be a safe and effective alternative, offering comparable clinical outcomes and greater socioeconomic benefits. Comprehensive and holistic perioperative planning plays a crucial role to successfully expand day-case hernia repairs. Based on the results of this study, a patient selection criteria and perioperative protocol for day-case hernia repair are proposed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"96 9","pages":"2300-2307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.70667","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite the advantages of lower healthcare costs and decreased elective surgery wait times without compromise to patient outcome, rates of day-case hernia repairs remain much lower than the RACS target of 70%–80%. Certain patient cohorts are often unnecessarily excluded due to perceived risks.

Objectives

To review literature on patient and procedural factors influencing same-day discharge after inguinal, femoral, and umbilical hernia repairs, and to outline an evidence-based selection criteria and perioperative protocol to improve day-case rates.

Methods

A systematic review of peer-reviewed English-language studies involving inguinal, umbilical, and femoral hernia repairs in patients over 18 years, in day and overnight case settings.

Results

Patient factors facilitating same-day discharge are age under 65 years, ASA grades I–II, and uncomplicated hernia types. Selected patients aged over 65 or with ASA grades III–IV may be appropriate candidates and should not be excluded by default. Procedural factors facilitating same-day discharge include unilateral surgery, use of adjunctive local anaesthesia, and protocols to reduce risk of common postoperative complications. Logistical factors such as comprehensive discharge planning and strategic theatre scheduling can further increase the success of day-cases.

Conclusions

For appropriately selected patients, aged up to 80 years and ASA up to IV, day-case hernia repair can be a safe and effective alternative, offering comparable clinical outcomes and greater socioeconomic benefits. Comprehensive and holistic perioperative planning plays a crucial role to successfully expand day-case hernia repairs. Based on the results of this study, a patient selection criteria and perioperative protocol for day-case hernia repair are proposed.

扩大腹股沟、股疝和脐疝修补术的日例实践:促进和排除当日出院的患者和程序因素综述。
背景:尽管具有降低医疗费用和减少选择性手术等待时间而不影响患者预后的优势,但一天的疝气修复率仍然远低于RACS目标的70%-80%。由于可感知的风险,某些患者队列经常被不必要地排除在外。目的:回顾影响腹股沟、股疝和脐疝修补术后当日出院的患者和手术因素的文献,并概述以证据为基础的选择标准和围手术期方案,以提高当日病例率。方法:系统回顾同行评议的英语研究,涉及18岁以上患者的腹股沟、脐带和股疝修复,在日间和夜间的病例设置。结果:促进当日出院的患者因素为年龄在65岁以下、ASA分级为I-II级、无并发症的疝类型。选定的65岁以上或ASA分级为III-IV级的患者可能是合适的候选人,不应默认排除。促进当日出院的程序因素包括单侧手术、辅助局部麻醉的使用以及降低常见术后并发症风险的方案。后勤因素,如全面的出院计划和战略性的手术室调度,可以进一步提高日间病例的成功率。结论:对于适当选择的患者,年龄不超过80岁,ASA不超过IV岁,一天的疝修补术可以是一种安全有效的替代方法,可以提供相当的临床结果和更大的社会经济效益。全面和全面的围手术期计划是成功扩大疝修补的关键。基于本研究的结果,提出了一日疝修补术的患者选择标准和围手术期方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书