{"title":"Advertising Ban in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Private Hospital Managers in Türkiye.","authors":"Tutku Ekiz Kavukoğlu, Gürkan Sert","doi":"10.1007/s10728-026-00564-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of advertising in healthcare is regulated strictly worldwide by ethical and legal regulations, yet its implications remain a matter of constant debate. This qualitative study examined the perceptions, approaches, and knowledge of private hospital managers in Istanbul concerning Türkiye’s healthcare advertising ban. In-depth interviews were used as the data collection method. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 12 managers working in private hospitals selected via purposive sampling. The participant group consisted of 4 general managers, 4 public relations managers, and 4 corporate communications and marketing manager. In terms of educational background, six participants held bachelor’s degrees, while the remaining six held postgraduate degrees. Data analysis was structured around an inductive thematic framework. As a result of the analysis, six main themes were identified: views on healthcare advertising bans; feelings about healthcare advertisements; views on healthcare advertising risks; willingness to advertise their own hospitals; knowledge of advertising regulations; comments on the distinction between promotion, information, and advertising. The findings indicated that most managers strongly support regulating healthcare advertising through legal frameworks. However, a major concern was identified as the uncontrolled rise of social media advertising and ethical breaches. Managers stressed that this trend complicates the distinction between advertising, promotion, and informational activities, thereby hindering patients’ access to accurate information. They emphasized that all hospital communication must strictly remain within ethical promotion and informational boundaries. Overall, the study highlights the critical importance of providers safeguarding patients’ right to accurate, unbiased information while avoiding misleading content. The findings offer valuable implications for policymakers to establish a more ethical and transparent healthcare communication environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00564-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of advertising in healthcare is regulated strictly worldwide by ethical and legal regulations, yet its implications remain a matter of constant debate. This qualitative study examined the perceptions, approaches, and knowledge of private hospital managers in Istanbul concerning Türkiye’s healthcare advertising ban. In-depth interviews were used as the data collection method. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 12 managers working in private hospitals selected via purposive sampling. The participant group consisted of 4 general managers, 4 public relations managers, and 4 corporate communications and marketing manager. In terms of educational background, six participants held bachelor’s degrees, while the remaining six held postgraduate degrees. Data analysis was structured around an inductive thematic framework. As a result of the analysis, six main themes were identified: views on healthcare advertising bans; feelings about healthcare advertisements; views on healthcare advertising risks; willingness to advertise their own hospitals; knowledge of advertising regulations; comments on the distinction between promotion, information, and advertising. The findings indicated that most managers strongly support regulating healthcare advertising through legal frameworks. However, a major concern was identified as the uncontrolled rise of social media advertising and ethical breaches. Managers stressed that this trend complicates the distinction between advertising, promotion, and informational activities, thereby hindering patients’ access to accurate information. They emphasized that all hospital communication must strictly remain within ethical promotion and informational boundaries. Overall, the study highlights the critical importance of providers safeguarding patients’ right to accurate, unbiased information while avoiding misleading content. The findings offer valuable implications for policymakers to establish a more ethical and transparent healthcare communication environment.
期刊介绍:
Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.