Advertising Ban in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Private Hospital Managers in Türkiye.

IF 1.4 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Tutku Ekiz Kavukoğlu, Gürkan Sert
{"title":"Advertising Ban in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Private Hospital Managers in Türkiye.","authors":"Tutku Ekiz Kavukoğlu, Gürkan Sert","doi":"10.1007/s10728-026-00564-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of advertising in healthcare is regulated strictly worldwide by ethical and legal regulations, yet its implications remain a matter of constant debate. This qualitative study examined the perceptions, approaches, and knowledge of private hospital managers in Istanbul concerning Türkiye’s healthcare advertising ban. In-depth interviews were used as the data collection method. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 12 managers working in private hospitals selected via purposive sampling. The participant group consisted of 4 general managers, 4 public relations managers, and 4 corporate communications and marketing manager. In terms of educational background, six participants held bachelor’s degrees, while the remaining six held postgraduate degrees. Data analysis was structured around an inductive thematic framework. As a result of the analysis, six main themes were identified: views on healthcare advertising bans; feelings about healthcare advertisements; views on healthcare advertising risks; willingness to advertise their own hospitals; knowledge of advertising regulations; comments on the distinction between promotion, information, and advertising. The findings indicated that most managers strongly support regulating healthcare advertising through legal frameworks. However, a major concern was identified as the uncontrolled rise of social media advertising and ethical breaches. Managers stressed that this trend complicates the distinction between advertising, promotion, and informational activities, thereby hindering patients’ access to accurate information. They emphasized that all hospital communication must strictly remain within ethical promotion and informational boundaries. Overall, the study highlights the critical importance of providers safeguarding patients’ right to accurate, unbiased information while avoiding misleading content. The findings offer valuable implications for policymakers to establish a more ethical and transparent healthcare communication environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00564-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of advertising in healthcare is regulated strictly worldwide by ethical and legal regulations, yet its implications remain a matter of constant debate. This qualitative study examined the perceptions, approaches, and knowledge of private hospital managers in Istanbul concerning Türkiye’s healthcare advertising ban. In-depth interviews were used as the data collection method. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 12 managers working in private hospitals selected via purposive sampling. The participant group consisted of 4 general managers, 4 public relations managers, and 4 corporate communications and marketing manager. In terms of educational background, six participants held bachelor’s degrees, while the remaining six held postgraduate degrees. Data analysis was structured around an inductive thematic framework. As a result of the analysis, six main themes were identified: views on healthcare advertising bans; feelings about healthcare advertisements; views on healthcare advertising risks; willingness to advertise their own hospitals; knowledge of advertising regulations; comments on the distinction between promotion, information, and advertising. The findings indicated that most managers strongly support regulating healthcare advertising through legal frameworks. However, a major concern was identified as the uncontrolled rise of social media advertising and ethical breaches. Managers stressed that this trend complicates the distinction between advertising, promotion, and informational activities, thereby hindering patients’ access to accurate information. They emphasized that all hospital communication must strictly remain within ethical promotion and informational boundaries. Overall, the study highlights the critical importance of providers safeguarding patients’ right to accurate, unbiased information while avoiding misleading content. The findings offer valuable implications for policymakers to establish a more ethical and transparent healthcare communication environment.

医疗行业广告禁令:基于浙江省民营医院管理者视角的定性研究。
在全球范围内,医疗保健广告的使用受到道德和法律法规的严格监管,但其影响仍然是一个不断争论的问题。本定性研究检查的看法,方法和知识的私立医院管理人员在伊斯坦布尔有关 rkiye的医疗保健广告禁令。采用深度访谈作为数据收集方法。通过有目的抽样,对12名在私立医院工作的管理人员进行了半结构化、开放式访谈。参与小组由4位总经理、4位公关经理、4位企业传播和营销经理组成。从学历上看,6人本科以上学历,6人研究生以上学历。数据分析是围绕归纳主题框架进行的。作为分析的结果,确定了六个主题:对医疗保健广告禁令的看法;对医疗保健广告的感受;对医疗保健广告风险的认识愿意为自己的医院做广告;了解广告法规;关于促销、信息和广告之间区别的评论。研究结果表明,大多数管理者强烈支持通过法律框架来规范医疗保健广告。然而,一个主要的担忧被确定为社交媒体广告和道德违规的不受控制的增长。管理人员强调,这种趋势使广告、促销和信息活动之间的区别复杂化,从而阻碍了患者获得准确的信息。他们强调,医院的所有沟通必须严格保持在道德促进和信息界限之内。总的来说,该研究强调了提供者在避免误导性内容的同时保护患者获得准确、公正信息的权利的重要性。这些发现为决策者建立一个更加道德和透明的医疗保健交流环境提供了有价值的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书