"No Safe Place to Call": Perspectives and Experiences of Access to Mental Health Services by People Found not Criminally Responsible on Account of a Mental Disorder.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/14999013251353794
Marichelle Leclair, Laurence Roy, Jeanne Gobeil Langlois, Arianne Imbeault, Audrey-Anne Dumais Michaud, Anne G Crocker
{"title":"\"No Safe Place to Call\": Perspectives and Experiences of Access to Mental Health Services by People Found not Criminally Responsible on Account of a Mental Disorder.","authors":"Marichelle Leclair, Laurence Roy, Jeanne Gobeil Langlois, Arianne Imbeault, Audrey-Anne Dumais Michaud, Anne G Crocker","doi":"10.1177/14999013251353794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The growing role of the justice system in the care of individuals with mental illness has led to concerns about access to adequate and timely mental health services, particularly for persons with severe mental illness whose behaviors increase their risk of justice involvement. This study investigated the perceptions of people found not criminally responsible, their loved ones, peer support workers, and other mental health professionals and managers regarding access to effective and relevant mental health services. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 25 participants, and data analyses were carried out according using thematic analysis. The findings highlighted how past experiences of stigma, trauma, inefficiency, and discrimination within a hospital-centric system influenced service users' and caregivers' ability to seek and engage with care. Current access mechanisms, such as police intervention and emergency room visits, were described as unacceptable and often viewed as options of last resort. Consequently, service users frequently entered the healthcare system only when their needs had escalated in complexity, making them difficult to address within the scope of standard clinical practice. Implications for policy and service organization are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14052,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forensic Mental Health","volume":"24 3","pages":"255-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13044435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forensic Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14999013251353794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing role of the justice system in the care of individuals with mental illness has led to concerns about access to adequate and timely mental health services, particularly for persons with severe mental illness whose behaviors increase their risk of justice involvement. This study investigated the perceptions of people found not criminally responsible, their loved ones, peer support workers, and other mental health professionals and managers regarding access to effective and relevant mental health services. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 25 participants, and data analyses were carried out according using thematic analysis. The findings highlighted how past experiences of stigma, trauma, inefficiency, and discrimination within a hospital-centric system influenced service users' and caregivers' ability to seek and engage with care. Current access mechanisms, such as police intervention and emergency room visits, were described as unacceptable and often viewed as options of last resort. Consequently, service users frequently entered the healthcare system only when their needs had escalated in complexity, making them difficult to address within the scope of standard clinical practice. Implications for policy and service organization are discussed.

“没有安全的地方可打电话”:因精神障碍而被认定无刑事责任的人获得精神卫生服务的观点和经验。
司法系统在照顾精神病患者方面的作用日益增强,这导致人们对能否获得适当和及时的精神卫生服务感到关切,特别是对那些行为增加其被司法介入风险的严重精神病患者而言。本研究调查了被认定无刑事责任的人、他们的亲人、同伴支持工作者和其他精神卫生专业人员和管理人员对获得有效和相关的精神卫生服务的看法。对25名参与者进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组,并根据主题分析进行了数据分析。研究结果强调了过去在以医院为中心的系统中耻辱、创伤、效率低下和歧视的经历如何影响了服务用户和护理人员寻求和参与护理的能力。目前的准入机制,如警察干预和急诊室访问,被认为是不可接受的,往往被视为最后的选择。因此,服务用户往往只有在他们的需求变得复杂时才进入医疗保健系统,这使得他们很难在标准临床实践的范围内得到解决。讨论了对政策和服务组织的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书