Development of a perinatal trauma screening tool: Detecting the silent struggle of perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tracey Mackle, Lucia Colodro-Conde, Therese de Dassel, Tessa R Clarkson, Katrina L Grasby, Anastasia N Braun, Kylie Burke, Sarah E Medland
{"title":"Development of a perinatal trauma screening tool: Detecting the silent struggle of perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder.","authors":"Tracey Mackle, Lucia Colodro-Conde, Therese de Dassel, Tessa R Clarkson, Katrina L Grasby, Anastasia N Braun, Kylie Burke, Sarah E Medland","doi":"10.1177/00048674261434407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal screening for perinatal mental illness is recommended in Australia; however, these tools do not screen for perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While existing perinatal PTSD tools show validity, they vary in diagnostic agreement, and most are focused on PTSD following childbirth. Early detection of PTSD symptoms at any phase of perinatal care is critical to improve maternal/infant outcomes and engagement with effective treatment. Unfortunately, gaps remain in practice for identifying perinatal PTSD.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to develop a screening tool to detect current symptoms of perinatal PTSD or higher risk of developing the disorder, resulting from index perinatal event(s) or experience(s) during conception, pregnancy and the postpartum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>If any perinatal trauma was endorsed, participants completed an online questionnaire and if consenting, a semi-structured clinical telephone interview during their current pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Twenty-five items were submitted for exploratory factor analysis, <i>n</i> = 114, and the results supported a two-factor solution. After removing items with poor loadings, a 17-item, two-factor solution explained 68.36% of the total variance. Each of the components had excellent internal consistency; component one α = .954 and component two α = .897. Following a receiver operating characteristic analysis <i>n</i> = 52, the optimal cutoff score of ⩾11 was identified with 90.9% sensitivity and 61% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate predictive validity of the tool shows promise for detecting those currently experiencing symptoms of perinatal PTSD and at higher risk of developing the disorder, supporting utility in clinical settings, pending future validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"815-825"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261434407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Universal screening for perinatal mental illness is recommended in Australia; however, these tools do not screen for perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While existing perinatal PTSD tools show validity, they vary in diagnostic agreement, and most are focused on PTSD following childbirth. Early detection of PTSD symptoms at any phase of perinatal care is critical to improve maternal/infant outcomes and engagement with effective treatment. Unfortunately, gaps remain in practice for identifying perinatal PTSD.

Aim: The aim of the study was to develop a screening tool to detect current symptoms of perinatal PTSD or higher risk of developing the disorder, resulting from index perinatal event(s) or experience(s) during conception, pregnancy and the postpartum.

Methods: If any perinatal trauma was endorsed, participants completed an online questionnaire and if consenting, a semi-structured clinical telephone interview during their current pregnancy.

Findings: Twenty-five items were submitted for exploratory factor analysis, n = 114, and the results supported a two-factor solution. After removing items with poor loadings, a 17-item, two-factor solution explained 68.36% of the total variance. Each of the components had excellent internal consistency; component one α = .954 and component two α = .897. Following a receiver operating characteristic analysis n = 52, the optimal cutoff score of ⩾11 was identified with 90.9% sensitivity and 61% specificity.

Conclusion: Moderate predictive validity of the tool shows promise for detecting those currently experiencing symptoms of perinatal PTSD and at higher risk of developing the disorder, supporting utility in clinical settings, pending future validation.

围产期创伤筛查工具的开发:检测围产期创伤后应激障碍的无声斗争。
背景:澳大利亚建议对围产期精神疾病进行普遍筛查;然而,这些工具不能筛查围产期创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。虽然现有的围产期PTSD工具显示出有效性,但它们在诊断一致性方面存在差异,而且大多数都集中在分娩后的PTSD上。在围产期护理的任何阶段早期发现创伤后应激障碍症状对于改善母婴结局和有效治疗至关重要。不幸的是,在识别围产期创伤后应激障碍的实践中仍然存在差距。目的:该研究的目的是开发一种筛查工具,以检测围产期PTSD的当前症状或患该疾病的高风险,这些症状或风险是由孕期、妊娠和产后的主要围产期事件或经历引起的。方法:如果任何围产期创伤被认可,参与者完成一份在线问卷,如果同意,在他们目前的怀孕期间进行半结构化的临床电话采访。结果:共提交25个项目进行探索性因子分析,n = 114,结果支持双因素解决方案。在去除加载不良的项目后,17个项目的双因素解决方案解释了总方差的68.36%。各组分具有良好的内部一致性;组分一α =。954,第二分量α =。897。在接受者操作特征分析n = 52之后,以90.9%的敏感性和61%的特异性确定了小于或等于11的最佳截止评分。结论:该工具具有中等预测效度,有望检测出那些目前正在经历围产期创伤后应激障碍症状和患该疾病风险较高的患者,支持临床应用,有待进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书