Cancer genome standards for long-read sequencing using cancer cell line mixtures.

IF 5 2区 生物学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jia Zhang, Ho Yi Wong, Lingchen Liu, Lambros T Koufariotis, Scott Wood, Nadine Fitzpatrick, Jenny Quiatchon, Paul Collins, John V Pearson, Nicola Waddell
{"title":"Cancer genome standards for long-read sequencing using cancer cell line mixtures.","authors":"Jia Zhang, Ho Yi Wong, Lingchen Liu, Lambros T Koufariotis, Scott Wood, Nadine Fitzpatrick, Jenny Quiatchon, Paul Collins, John V Pearson, Nicola Waddell","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/giag037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-read sequencing (LRS) improves genome alignment and facilitates resolving variants in genomic regions of low complexity, making it a promising approach for cancer variant detection and biomarker discovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we evaluate the performance of LRS using Oxford Nanopore sequencing to detect somatic variants across different tumour purities and sequencing depths by comparing to somatic variants from short-read sequencing. We generated experimental mixtures of cancer cell lines and matched normal cell lines to simulate 10 tumour purities (ranging from 0 to 100% tumour content). This resulted in 22 samples, which were sequenced using whole-genome LRS to a targeted depth of 60x, and somatic variants were identified. We down-sampled data to explore the optimal read depth for somatic variant detection. Our results show long-read variant calling tools achieve recall rates comparable to short-read gold standards. While tumour sequencing depth of 30x-60x is generally sufficient for detecting common variants, particularly structural variants, sequencing the matched normal sample at adequate depth is crucial for accuracy. Notably, we found variants unique to LRS that may represent real and previously undetected events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights key factors for optimising cancer genome sequencing with LRS and provides a comprehensive dataset of cell line mixtures for future research and tool development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12581,"journal":{"name":"GigaScience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13137868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GigaScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giag037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-read sequencing (LRS) improves genome alignment and facilitates resolving variants in genomic regions of low complexity, making it a promising approach for cancer variant detection and biomarker discovery.

Results: Here, we evaluate the performance of LRS using Oxford Nanopore sequencing to detect somatic variants across different tumour purities and sequencing depths by comparing to somatic variants from short-read sequencing. We generated experimental mixtures of cancer cell lines and matched normal cell lines to simulate 10 tumour purities (ranging from 0 to 100% tumour content). This resulted in 22 samples, which were sequenced using whole-genome LRS to a targeted depth of 60x, and somatic variants were identified. We down-sampled data to explore the optimal read depth for somatic variant detection. Our results show long-read variant calling tools achieve recall rates comparable to short-read gold standards. While tumour sequencing depth of 30x-60x is generally sufficient for detecting common variants, particularly structural variants, sequencing the matched normal sample at adequate depth is crucial for accuracy. Notably, we found variants unique to LRS that may represent real and previously undetected events.

Conclusion: This study highlights key factors for optimising cancer genome sequencing with LRS and provides a comprehensive dataset of cell line mixtures for future research and tool development.

使用癌细胞系混合物进行长读测序的癌症基因组标准。
长读测序(Long-read sequencing, LRS)改善了基因组比对,并有助于在低复杂性的基因组区域解决变异,使其成为癌症变异检测和生物标志物发现的一种有前途的方法。在这里,我们使用牛津纳米孔测序来评估LRS的性能,通过比较短读测序的体细胞变异来检测不同肿瘤纯度和测序深度的体细胞变异。我们生成了肿瘤细胞系和匹配的正常细胞系的实验混合物,以模拟10种肿瘤纯度(从0到100%肿瘤含量)。使用全基因组LRS对22个样本进行了测序,目标深度为60倍,并鉴定出体细胞变异。我们对数据进行了下采样,以探索体细胞变异检测的最佳读取深度。我们的研究结果表明,长读变体调用工具实现了与短读黄金标准相当的召回率。虽然肿瘤测序深度为30至60倍通常足以检测常见变异,特别是结构变异,但在适当深度对匹配的正常样本进行测序对于准确性至关重要。值得注意的是,我们发现LRS特有的变体可能代表真实的和以前未检测到的事件。这项研究强调了利用LRS优化癌症基因组测序的关键因素,并为未来的研究和工具开发提供了细胞系混合物的综合数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GigaScience
GigaScience MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: GigaScience seeks to transform data dissemination and utilization in the life and biomedical sciences. As an online open-access open-data journal, it specializes in publishing "big-data" studies encompassing various fields. Its scope includes not only "omic" type data and the fields of high-throughput biology currently serviced by large public repositories, but also the growing range of more difficult-to-access data, such as imaging, neuroscience, ecology, cohort data, systems biology and other new types of large-scale shareable data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书