Katharina Buschulte, Mareike Kotzerke, Linda Waßmuth, Claudia Ganter, Rembert Koczulla, Philipp Höger, Markus Polke, Nikola Stenzel, Michael Kreuter
{"title":"Yoga in Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: a Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Katharina Buschulte, Mareike Kotzerke, Linda Waßmuth, Claudia Ganter, Rembert Koczulla, Philipp Höger, Markus Polke, Nikola Stenzel, Michael Kreuter","doi":"10.1055/a-2831-6649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical activity and quality of life (QoL) are reduced in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (fILD). Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a yoga intervention and an initial evaluation of effectiveness.Patients with fILD were randomized between yoga (2×/week, 12 weeks, n=9) and surveillance (n=7). The primary endpoint was change in QoL. Following the feasibility approach, we used a mixed method approach for assessing QoL. Qualitative data were collected in focus group interviews, quantitative data through established QoL questionnaires (K-BILD, HADS, LCQ, VAS) at baseline and at 12 weeks.Baseline characteristics in the yoga vs. surveillance groups were: median age 65 vs. 71 years, female 44% vs. 14%, forced vital capacity (FVC) 68% vs. 78%. The average participation rate was 82% and there was no evidence of a medical safety risk. After 12 weeks, there were no significant differences in FVC. However, results showed significant differences for K-BILD total and dyspnea score (p<0.05) favoring yoga, while HADS, LCQ and VAS showed no differences. Post intervention, health-related improvements and transfer of yoga practices into daily life to overcome dyspnea sensation were perceived as main benefits.The results suggest that yoga is feasible for patients with fILD. Moreover, yoga for fILD might be associated with significant benefits in QoL. Data interpretation is limited by imbalances in patient characteristics and small numbers due to its feasibility approach. However, this study provides valuable preliminary insights about acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520755,"journal":{"name":"Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2831-6649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Physical activity and quality of life (QoL) are reduced in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (fILD). Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a yoga intervention and an initial evaluation of effectiveness.Patients with fILD were randomized between yoga (2×/week, 12 weeks, n=9) and surveillance (n=7). The primary endpoint was change in QoL. Following the feasibility approach, we used a mixed method approach for assessing QoL. Qualitative data were collected in focus group interviews, quantitative data through established QoL questionnaires (K-BILD, HADS, LCQ, VAS) at baseline and at 12 weeks.Baseline characteristics in the yoga vs. surveillance groups were: median age 65 vs. 71 years, female 44% vs. 14%, forced vital capacity (FVC) 68% vs. 78%. The average participation rate was 82% and there was no evidence of a medical safety risk. After 12 weeks, there were no significant differences in FVC. However, results showed significant differences for K-BILD total and dyspnea score (p<0.05) favoring yoga, while HADS, LCQ and VAS showed no differences. Post intervention, health-related improvements and transfer of yoga practices into daily life to overcome dyspnea sensation were perceived as main benefits.The results suggest that yoga is feasible for patients with fILD. Moreover, yoga for fILD might be associated with significant benefits in QoL. Data interpretation is limited by imbalances in patient characteristics and small numbers due to its feasibility approach. However, this study provides valuable preliminary insights about acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy.
纤维化间质性肺疾病(field)患者的身体活动和生活质量(QoL)降低。我们的目的是评估瑜伽干预的可行性和有效性的初步评估。field患者随机分为瑜伽组(2次/周,12周,n=9)和监测组(n=7)。主要终点为生活质量的改变。根据可行性方法,我们使用混合方法来评估生活质量。定性数据通过焦点小组访谈收集,定量数据通过制定的生活质量问卷(K-BILD, HADS, LCQ, VAS)在基线和12周收集。瑜伽组与监测组的基线特征为:中位年龄65 vs 71岁,女性44% vs 14%,用力肺活量(FVC) 68% vs 78%。平均参与率为82%,没有证据表明存在医疗安全风险。12周后,FVC无显著差异。然而,结果显示K-BILD总分和呼吸困难评分有显著差异(p