QT Interval Evaluation in Right Ventricular Pacing: Validation of a Novel Formula.

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1111/pace.70239
Amr Abdin, Alhasan Almasri, Ibrahim Antoun, Charles Gieres, Christian Werner, Yvonne Bewarder, Christian Ukena, Igor Schwantke, Michael Böhm, Saarraaken Kulenthiran
{"title":"QT Interval Evaluation in Right Ventricular Pacing: Validation of a Novel Formula.","authors":"Amr Abdin, Alhasan Almasri, Ibrahim Antoun, Charles Gieres, Christian Werner, Yvonne Bewarder, Christian Ukena, Igor Schwantke, Michael Böhm, Saarraaken Kulenthiran","doi":"10.1111/pace.70239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>QT interval measurement in the presence of right ventricular pacing (RVP) represents a clinical challenge. We therefore aimed to derive and validate a formula for QT estimation during RVP in a large cohort of pacemaker patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 100 patients in a derivation cohort and 487 in a validation cohort. Eligible patients had implanted pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, preserved atrioventricular conduction, and a narrow native QRS. Standardized 12-lead ECGs were recorded during intrinsic rhythm, atrial pacing (AP), and RVP at matched heart rates. Linear regression of QT during non-paced rhythm against paced QT yielded the equation: QT_non-paced = 139.23 + 0.55 × QT_paced. In the validation cohort (mean age 71 ± 13 years, 72% male), application of the formula showed a significant correlation between predicted and observed QT values (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a modest mean overestimation of 15 ms, with consistent accuracy across subgroups defined by sex, device type, and lead position. Compared directly with the Bogossian method, our formula showed superior performance, with a lower mean absolute deviation (26.2 vs. 39.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel, heart rate-independent formula provides a reliable method for estimating the intrinsic QT interval from paced measurements. It represents a practical tool to improve QT assessment and arrhythmic risk evaluation in patients with RVP, with potential implications for clinical decision-making and drug safety monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1455-1463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: QT interval measurement in the presence of right ventricular pacing (RVP) represents a clinical challenge. We therefore aimed to derive and validate a formula for QT estimation during RVP in a large cohort of pacemaker patients.

Methods and results: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients in a derivation cohort and 487 in a validation cohort. Eligible patients had implanted pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, preserved atrioventricular conduction, and a narrow native QRS. Standardized 12-lead ECGs were recorded during intrinsic rhythm, atrial pacing (AP), and RVP at matched heart rates. Linear regression of QT during non-paced rhythm against paced QT yielded the equation: QT_non-paced = 139.23 + 0.55 × QT_paced. In the validation cohort (mean age 71 ± 13 years, 72% male), application of the formula showed a significant correlation between predicted and observed QT values (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a modest mean overestimation of 15 ms, with consistent accuracy across subgroups defined by sex, device type, and lead position. Compared directly with the Bogossian method, our formula showed superior performance, with a lower mean absolute deviation (26.2 vs. 39.9).

Conclusion: This novel, heart rate-independent formula provides a reliable method for estimating the intrinsic QT interval from paced measurements. It represents a practical tool to improve QT assessment and arrhythmic risk evaluation in patients with RVP, with potential implications for clinical decision-making and drug safety monitoring.

右心室起搏的QT间期评价:新公式的验证。
背景:在右心室起搏(RVP)存在的QT间期测量是一个临床挑战。因此,我们的目的是推导并验证一个在起搏器患者大队列中RVP期间QT估计的公式。方法和结果:我们前瞻性地纳入了100例衍生队列患者和487例验证队列患者。符合条件的患者植入了起搏器或植入式心律转复除颤器,保留了房室传导和狭窄的原生QRS。标准化的12导联心电图记录在匹配心率下的内在节律、心房起搏(AP)和RVP。非起搏期QT与起搏期QT的线性回归结果为:qt_non -pace = 139.23 + 0.55 × qt_pace。在验证队列(平均年龄71±13岁,72%为男性)中,公式的应用显示预测QT值与观察QT值之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.50, p < 0.001)。Bland-Altman分析显示,平均高估15毫秒,在性别、设备类型和领先位置定义的亚组中具有一致的准确性。与直接bogossip方法相比,我们的公式表现出更好的性能,平均绝对偏差更低(26.2 vs. 39.9)。结论:这一新颖的、与心率无关的公式提供了一种可靠的方法,可以从心律测量中估计固有QT间期。它是改善RVP患者QT间期评估和心律失常风险评估的实用工具,对临床决策和药物安全监测具有潜在意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书