Comparison of Three Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine for Attenuation of the Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation by Assessment of Haemodynamic Parameters and Plasma Catecholamine Levels Under Bi-spectral Index Guided Anaesthesia - A Randomised Double Blind Controlled Study.

IF 1.2 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Michell Gulabani, Medha Mohta, Nitesh Kumar, Diwesh Chawla, Seema Garg, Shashank Tripathi, Abhay Singh Chauhan
{"title":"Comparison of Three Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine for Attenuation of the Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation by Assessment of Haemodynamic Parameters and Plasma Catecholamine Levels Under Bi-spectral Index Guided Anaesthesia - A Randomised Double Blind Controlled Study.","authors":"Michell Gulabani, Medha Mohta, Nitesh Kumar, Diwesh Chawla, Seema Garg, Shashank Tripathi, Abhay Singh Chauhan","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2026.252245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dexmedetomidine has been studied for attenuation of laryngoscopy and intubation response with varied results, however the depth of anaesthesia and plasma catecholamine levels have not been measured. Considering the lacunae, this study was planned with three doses of dexmedetomidine: 0.5, 0.75 and 1 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> under bi-spectral index monitoring and plasma catecholamine assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred sixty-eight consenting adult patients of either sex were divided into 3 groups (56 each) to receive I/V dexmedetomidine 0.5, 0.75 or 1 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> prior to induction. A baseline sample of catecholamines was taken and study drug was infused over 10 minutes. Thereafter, standard anaesthesia induction followed and haemodynamic parameters were noted at designated time intervals. Another sample of catecholamines was drawn at 3 minutes after intubation. The primary outcome was to compare the change in heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes included: change in catecholamine levels, sedation scores, propofol dose and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All doses of dexmedetomidine successfully obtunded the haemodynamic response; however, no significant difference was seen on inter-group comparison (<i>P</i> >0.05). A significant fall in nor-adrenaline values compared with baseline was noted in all groups, without any significant difference among groups for both catecholamines. Sedation scores reduced from baseline in all groups without any difference on inter- group comparison. Statistically significant reduction in propofol requirement and higher incidence of bradycardia with 1 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i>=0.014) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>0.5 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> of dexmedetomidine can be used for pressor response attenuation as the incidence of bradycardia was higher with 1 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> and 0.75 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> had no added advantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":" ","pages":"125-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13081455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2026.252245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dexmedetomidine has been studied for attenuation of laryngoscopy and intubation response with varied results, however the depth of anaesthesia and plasma catecholamine levels have not been measured. Considering the lacunae, this study was planned with three doses of dexmedetomidine: 0.5, 0.75 and 1 μg kg-1 under bi-spectral index monitoring and plasma catecholamine assessment.

Methods: One hundred sixty-eight consenting adult patients of either sex were divided into 3 groups (56 each) to receive I/V dexmedetomidine 0.5, 0.75 or 1 μg kg-1 prior to induction. A baseline sample of catecholamines was taken and study drug was infused over 10 minutes. Thereafter, standard anaesthesia induction followed and haemodynamic parameters were noted at designated time intervals. Another sample of catecholamines was drawn at 3 minutes after intubation. The primary outcome was to compare the change in heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes included: change in catecholamine levels, sedation scores, propofol dose and adverse events.

Results: All doses of dexmedetomidine successfully obtunded the haemodynamic response; however, no significant difference was seen on inter-group comparison (P >0.05). A significant fall in nor-adrenaline values compared with baseline was noted in all groups, without any significant difference among groups for both catecholamines. Sedation scores reduced from baseline in all groups without any difference on inter- group comparison. Statistically significant reduction in propofol requirement and higher incidence of bradycardia with 1 μg kg-1 (P=0.014) were observed.

Conclusion: 0.5 μg kg-1 of dexmedetomidine can be used for pressor response attenuation as the incidence of bradycardia was higher with 1 μg kg-1 and 0.75 μg kg-1 had no added advantage.

三种不同剂量右美托咪定在双谱指数引导麻醉下通过评估血流动力学参数和血浆儿茶酚胺水平来减弱喉镜和插管时的升压反应的比较-一项随机双盲对照研究。
目的:研究了右美托咪定对喉镜和插管反应的衰减作用,结果各不相同,但麻醉深度和血浆儿茶酚胺水平尚未测定。考虑到腔窝,本研究拟采用0.5、0.75、1 μg kg-1三种剂量的右美托咪定,双谱指数监测和血浆儿茶酚胺评估。方法:168例男女均同意的成年患者分为3组(每组56例),诱导前分别给予I/V右美托咪定0.5、0.75或1 μg kg-1。服用儿茶酚胺基线样本,并在10分钟内注射研究药物。之后,进行标准麻醉诱导,并在指定的时间间隔记录血流动力学参数。插管后3分钟再次抽取儿茶酚胺样本。主要结果是比较心率和收缩压的变化。次要结局包括:儿茶酚胺水平的变化、镇静评分、异丙酚剂量和不良事件。结果:各剂量右美托咪定均能明显抑制血流动力学反应;组间比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与基线相比,所有组的非肾上腺素值均显著下降,两种儿茶酚胺在组间无显著差异。各组镇静评分均较基线降低,组间比较无差异。1μg kg-1时异丙酚需用量降低,心动过缓发生率增高(P=0.014)。结论:0.5 μg kg-1右美托咪定可用于降压反应,因为1 μg kg-1时心动过缓发生率较高,0.75 μg kg-1时降压反应无增加优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书