Value Analysis of MRI Habitat Analysis Combined Model in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-02 DOI:10.1177/15330338261439633
Junying Wang, Kang Liu, Yan Sui, Siyu Ma, Dewu Yang
{"title":"Value Analysis of MRI Habitat Analysis Combined Model in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors.","authors":"Junying Wang, Kang Liu, Yan Sui, Siyu Ma, Dewu Yang","doi":"10.1177/15330338261439633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the clinical diagnostic performance of a combined classification model incorporating magnetic resonance imaging (T1WI-CE) habitat and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) for differentiating borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (MEOTs).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 127 patients with pathologically confirmed ovarian tumors, including 62 with BOTs and 65 with MEOTs, all of whom underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examination. Twenty habitat features, including the original images, were extracted. T1WI-CE was used to extract 2395 radiomics features from two habitat subregions. Feature selection was performed using correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression.ResultsThe combined classification model had the highest area under the curve, 0.941 in the training group and 0.880 in the test group, thus outperforming the habitat area and clinical data classification model. The DeLong test demonstrated statistically significant differences between the combined classification model and the clinical classification model, with <i>P</i> values of 0.041 in the training group and 0.023 in the test group. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was observed in the DeLong test results between the cystic habitat subregion (H2) and the overall habitat region.ConclusionsThe combined classification model of habitat analysis and clinical data effectively improved the diagnostic efficacy of differentiating borderline from malignant ovarian tumors. The diagnostic efficacy of the habitat subregion (H1) dominated by solid components and the habitat overall region was superior to that of the habitat subregion dominated by cystic components.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"25 ","pages":"15330338261439633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13051162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338261439633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the clinical diagnostic performance of a combined classification model incorporating magnetic resonance imaging (T1WI-CE) habitat and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) for differentiating borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (MEOTs).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 127 patients with pathologically confirmed ovarian tumors, including 62 with BOTs and 65 with MEOTs, all of whom underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examination. Twenty habitat features, including the original images, were extracted. T1WI-CE was used to extract 2395 radiomics features from two habitat subregions. Feature selection was performed using correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression.ResultsThe combined classification model had the highest area under the curve, 0.941 in the training group and 0.880 in the test group, thus outperforming the habitat area and clinical data classification model. The DeLong test demonstrated statistically significant differences between the combined classification model and the clinical classification model, with P values of 0.041 in the training group and 0.023 in the test group. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was observed in the DeLong test results between the cystic habitat subregion (H2) and the overall habitat region.ConclusionsThe combined classification model of habitat analysis and clinical data effectively improved the diagnostic efficacy of differentiating borderline from malignant ovarian tumors. The diagnostic efficacy of the habitat subregion (H1) dominated by solid components and the habitat overall region was superior to that of the habitat subregion dominated by cystic components.

MRI生境分析联合模型在卵巢肿瘤诊断中的价值分析。
目的探讨磁共振成像(T1WI-CE)栖息地与人附睾蛋白4 (HE4)联合分类模型对交界性卵巢肿瘤(bot)与恶性上皮性卵巢肿瘤(MEOTs)的临床诊断价值。方法回顾性分析127例经病理证实的卵巢肿瘤患者,其中bot患者62例,MEOTs患者65例,术前均行磁共振成像检查。提取了包括原始图像在内的20个栖息地特征。使用T1WI-CE提取了两个栖息地亚区域的2395个放射组学特征。使用相关分析、最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归进行特征选择。结果联合分类模型曲线下面积最大,训练组为0.941,试验组为0.880,优于生境面积和临床资料分类模型。DeLong检验表明,联合分类模型与临床分类模型的差异有统计学意义,训练组的P值为0.041,试验组的P值为0.023。此外,囊性栖息地亚区(H2)与整体栖息地区域的DeLong检验结果有统计学差异。结论生境分析与临床资料相结合的分类模型有效提高了卵巢交界性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤的诊断效率。固体成分为主的生境分区(H1)和生境整体区域的诊断效能优于囊性成分为主的生境分区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书