Fully Automated Stain Quantification Framework for IHC Whole Slide Images in Breast Cancer.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1177/15330338251407734
Tuo Yin, Frédéric Lifrange, Zoë Denis, Alex de Caluwé, Laurence Buisseret, Xavier Catteau, Clara Legros, Nick Reynaert, Jennifer Dhont
{"title":"Fully Automated Stain Quantification Framework for IHC Whole Slide Images in Breast Cancer.","authors":"Tuo Yin, Frédéric Lifrange, Zoë Denis, Alex de Caluwé, Laurence Buisseret, Xavier Catteau, Clara Legros, Nick Reynaert, Jennifer Dhont","doi":"10.1177/15330338251407734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionImmunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a crucial role in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment selection, and research. However, manual scoring of IHC whole slide images (WSIs) is time-consuming and suffers from inter- and intra-observer variability.MethodsTo help address these challenges, we present and publicly release a fully automated, compartment-specific (ie, tumor and stroma) H-scoring framework for IHC analysis. The framework consists of three deep learning modules: tumor-stroma segmentation, nuclei segmentation, and H-score estimation for tumor and stroma. It processes WSIs in minutes, delivering consistent and reproducible H-scores with accuracy comparable to expert pathologists. The modular design also allows flexibility for use in other IHC tasks such as cellularity quantification, and supports configuration options to balance accuracy and computational efficiency.ResultsFine-tuned on 87 expert-annotated patches, the framework achieved a Spearman's rank correlation (<i>ρ</i>) in internal validation of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.89) across 100 expert-annotated WSIs, outperforming state-of-the-art (<i>ρ</i> = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85) and matching the inter-observer variability between two expert pathologists (<i>ρ</i> = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.63-0.94). In external validation, it achieved 86% accuracy in HER2 classification (0-3+) and a mean absolute error of 21 ± 10 (range: [5-46]) in CD73 scoring, where ground truth H-scores were all 0.ConclusionThe framework achieves agreement comparable to that of expert pathologists, underscoring its clinical utility in providing reproducible IHC scores that can reduce diagnostic variability and support consistent treatment decisions. The code is available at https://github.com/YinTuo/AutoIHC.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"25 ","pages":"15330338251407734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13051182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251407734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionImmunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a crucial role in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment selection, and research. However, manual scoring of IHC whole slide images (WSIs) is time-consuming and suffers from inter- and intra-observer variability.MethodsTo help address these challenges, we present and publicly release a fully automated, compartment-specific (ie, tumor and stroma) H-scoring framework for IHC analysis. The framework consists of three deep learning modules: tumor-stroma segmentation, nuclei segmentation, and H-score estimation for tumor and stroma. It processes WSIs in minutes, delivering consistent and reproducible H-scores with accuracy comparable to expert pathologists. The modular design also allows flexibility for use in other IHC tasks such as cellularity quantification, and supports configuration options to balance accuracy and computational efficiency.ResultsFine-tuned on 87 expert-annotated patches, the framework achieved a Spearman's rank correlation (ρ) in internal validation of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.89) across 100 expert-annotated WSIs, outperforming state-of-the-art (ρ = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85) and matching the inter-observer variability between two expert pathologists (ρ = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.63-0.94). In external validation, it achieved 86% accuracy in HER2 classification (0-3+) and a mean absolute error of 21 ± 10 (range: [5-46]) in CD73 scoring, where ground truth H-scores were all 0.ConclusionThe framework achieves agreement comparable to that of expert pathologists, underscoring its clinical utility in providing reproducible IHC scores that can reduce diagnostic variability and support consistent treatment decisions. The code is available at https://github.com/YinTuo/AutoIHC.

全自动染色定量框架的免疫组化整个幻灯片图像在乳腺癌。
免疫组织化学(IHC)在乳腺癌的诊断、治疗选择和研究中起着至关重要的作用。然而,人工评分的IHC全幻灯片图像(WSIs)是费时的,并遭受观察者之间和内部的可变性。为了帮助解决这些挑战,我们提出并公开发布了用于IHC分析的全自动、室特异性(即肿瘤和基质)h评分框架。该框架由三个深度学习模块组成:肿瘤-基质分割、核分割和肿瘤和基质的H-score估计。它在几分钟内处理wsi,提供一致和可重复的h分数,其准确性可与专家病理学家媲美。模块化设计还允许灵活地用于其他IHC任务,如细胞定量,并支持配置选项,以平衡准确性和计算效率。结果对87个专家注释补丁进行微调后,该框架在100个专家注释wsi的内部验证中实现了0.84(95%置信区间[CI]: 0.77-0.89)的Spearman等级相关性(ρ),优于最优水平(ρ = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85),并匹配了两个专家病理学家之间的观察者间可变性(ρ = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.63-0.94)。在外部验证中,它在HER2分类(0-3+)中达到86%的准确率,在CD73评分中平均绝对误差为21±10(范围:[5-46]),其中地面真实度h评分均为0。结论:该框架的一致性与病理学专家的一致,强调了其在提供可重复的IHC评分方面的临床应用,可以减少诊断的可变性并支持一致的治疗决策。代码可在https://github.com/YinTuo/AutoIHC上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书