Combination of Albumin and Cilostazol Improves Outcomes in a Rodent Model of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s12028-026-02491-6
A Karim Ahmed, James Feghali, Yu-Chien Shih, Jackson Miller, Eli Yazigi, Landon J Hansen, Jawad Khalifeh, Sai Chandan Reddy, Risheng Xu, Justin Caplan, L Fernando Gonzalez, Rafael J Tamargo, Judy Huang, Jose I Suarez, Christopher M Jackson
{"title":"Combination of Albumin and Cilostazol Improves Outcomes in a Rodent Model of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.","authors":"A Karim Ahmed, James Feghali, Yu-Chien Shih, Jackson Miller, Eli Yazigi, Landon J Hansen, Jawad Khalifeh, Sai Chandan Reddy, Risheng Xu, Justin Caplan, L Fernando Gonzalez, Rafael J Tamargo, Judy Huang, Jose I Suarez, Christopher M Jackson","doi":"10.1007/s12028-026-02491-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patients recovering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) often suffer secondary neurologic injury owing to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI)-a multifactorial phenomenon. Both albumin and cilostazol have shown efficacy for treating DCI in preclinical and early clinical studies. However, the utility of combining these treatments has not yet been rigorously tested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 83 mice, male and female, were randomly divided into five groups as follows: sham; vehicle (0.9% saline); 25% human albumin; cilostazol; and combination 25% human albumin with cilostazol. A total of 11 animals in each group underwent endovascular perforation of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to induce subarachnoid hemorrhage. Daily neuroscores were assessed for each animal, and brain water content was quantified as a surrogate for edema 96 h posthemorrhage. An additional five animals in each group underwent 11.7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 96 h to quantify vasospasm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in vessel diameter in the left subclavian artery (L SCA; p = 0.014), right subclavian artery (R SCA; p = 0.018), and right internal carotid artery (R ICA; p = 0.026) in the experimental groups with combined treatment outperforming vehicle or either cilostazol or albumin monotherapy. Compared with SAH with vehicle control, treatment with albumin and cilostazol resulted in significantly improved MCA territory pixel intensity (p = 0.017). The treatment groups all had lower brain water contents than the SAH group, most pronounced in the SAH + albumin with cilostazol group compared with the SAH group (p < 0.001). There was a significant overall difference in survival between the groups (p < 0.001), and median neuroscore at all time points in the SAH + combined treatment group, compared with SAH alone; at 24 h (p = 0.036), 48 h (p = 0.001), 72 h (p = 0.001), and 96 h (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination albumin and cilostazol resulted in superior outcomes, including brain water content (edema), large vessel vasospasm, behavioral scores, and survival across brain water content, MRA imaging, 28-point neuroscore, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. These preclinical data support the need for a clinical trial testing this combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"571-580"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-026-02491-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Patients recovering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) often suffer secondary neurologic injury owing to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI)-a multifactorial phenomenon. Both albumin and cilostazol have shown efficacy for treating DCI in preclinical and early clinical studies. However, the utility of combining these treatments has not yet been rigorously tested.

Methods: A total of 83 mice, male and female, were randomly divided into five groups as follows: sham; vehicle (0.9% saline); 25% human albumin; cilostazol; and combination 25% human albumin with cilostazol. A total of 11 animals in each group underwent endovascular perforation of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to induce subarachnoid hemorrhage. Daily neuroscores were assessed for each animal, and brain water content was quantified as a surrogate for edema 96 h posthemorrhage. An additional five animals in each group underwent 11.7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 96 h to quantify vasospasm.

Results: There was a significant difference in vessel diameter in the left subclavian artery (L SCA; p = 0.014), right subclavian artery (R SCA; p = 0.018), and right internal carotid artery (R ICA; p = 0.026) in the experimental groups with combined treatment outperforming vehicle or either cilostazol or albumin monotherapy. Compared with SAH with vehicle control, treatment with albumin and cilostazol resulted in significantly improved MCA territory pixel intensity (p = 0.017). The treatment groups all had lower brain water contents than the SAH group, most pronounced in the SAH + albumin with cilostazol group compared with the SAH group (p < 0.001). There was a significant overall difference in survival between the groups (p < 0.001), and median neuroscore at all time points in the SAH + combined treatment group, compared with SAH alone; at 24 h (p = 0.036), 48 h (p = 0.001), 72 h (p = 0.001), and 96 h (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Combination albumin and cilostazol resulted in superior outcomes, including brain water content (edema), large vessel vasospasm, behavioral scores, and survival across brain water content, MRA imaging, 28-point neuroscore, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. These preclinical data support the need for a clinical trial testing this combination therapy.

白蛋白联合西洛他唑改善啮齿动物动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血模型的预后。
背景与目的:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)患者在恢复过程中往往会出现迟发性脑缺血(DCI)引起的继发性神经系统损伤,这是一种多因素现象。在临床前和早期临床研究中,白蛋白和西洛他唑均显示出治疗DCI的疗效。然而,结合这些治疗的效用还没有经过严格的测试。方法:雄性和雌性小鼠83只,随机分为5组:假手术组;载体(0.9%生理盐水);25%人白蛋白;西洛地唑;25%人白蛋白联合西洛他唑。每组11只动物均行颈内动脉血管内穿孔(ICA)诱导蛛网膜下腔出血。评估每只动物的每日神经评分,并量化脑含水量作为出血后96小时水肿的替代指标。每组另外5只动物在96 h进行11.7 T磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)以量化血管痉挛。结果:联合治疗组左锁骨下动脉(L SCA, p = 0.014)、右锁骨下动脉(R SCA, p = 0.018)、右颈内动脉(R ICA, p = 0.026)的血管直径均优于单药组、西洛他唑或白蛋白单药组。与对照的SAH相比,白蛋白和西洛他唑治疗显著改善了MCA区域像素强度(p = 0.017)。治疗组的脑含水量均低于SAH组,最明显的是SAH +白蛋白联合西洛他唑组与SAH组相比(p结论:白蛋白和西洛他唑联合治疗的结果优于SAH组,包括脑含水量(水肿)、大血管痉挛、行为评分、脑含水量、MRA成像、28分神经评分和Kaplan-Meier分析的生存率。这些临床前数据支持对这种联合疗法进行临床试验的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书