Comparative Sensory Evaluation of Pediatric Liquid Omeprazole Formulations Available in the UK.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s40261-026-01548-w
Sejal R Ranmal, Elisa Alessandrini, Catherine Tuleu
{"title":"Comparative Sensory Evaluation of Pediatric Liquid Omeprazole Formulations Available in the UK.","authors":"Sejal R Ranmal, Elisa Alessandrini, Catherine Tuleu","doi":"10.1007/s40261-026-01548-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Omeprazole is a widely prescribed proton pump inhibitor used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease and other acid-related disorders in children. Despite its clinical importance, the availability of licensed liquid formulations varies worldwide, often resulting in the use of extemporaneously compounded preparations. These liquid products have varying sensory characteristics that can influence patient acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, single-blind sensory evaluation study was conducted with a panel of 30 adult volunteers (aged 24 ± 2.6 years; 77% female) to assess the palatability of six omeprazole liquid formulations available in the UK. Participants rated taste, aftertaste, smell, and mouthfeel aversiveness using a visual analog scale, overall acceptability using a 5-point facial hedonic scale, and provided qualitative feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The compounded 8.4% sodium bicarbonate suspension had a significantly more aversive taste (mean ± standard deviation: 74 ± 31; median [interquartile range]: 83 [63-100]) and aftertaste (55 ± 33; 61 [23-80]) compared with all licensed formulations (p < 0.001), with bitterness being a prominent attribute. The licensed menthol-flavored 10-mg/15-mL oral solution received the lowest taste aversiveness rating (17 ± 23; 6 [1-19]), and the highest overall acceptability. Other licensed formulations were generally rated as mild to moderately aversive, with some irritating or burning sensations also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A sensory analysis revealed clear differences between compounded and licensed omeprazole formulations, highlighting the importance of developing and prescribing palatable age-appropriate formulations for pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"669-680"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13212742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-026-01548-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Omeprazole is a widely prescribed proton pump inhibitor used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease and other acid-related disorders in children. Despite its clinical importance, the availability of licensed liquid formulations varies worldwide, often resulting in the use of extemporaneously compounded preparations. These liquid products have varying sensory characteristics that can influence patient acceptability.

Methods: A randomized, single-blind sensory evaluation study was conducted with a panel of 30 adult volunteers (aged 24 ± 2.6 years; 77% female) to assess the palatability of six omeprazole liquid formulations available in the UK. Participants rated taste, aftertaste, smell, and mouthfeel aversiveness using a visual analog scale, overall acceptability using a 5-point facial hedonic scale, and provided qualitative feedback.

Results: The compounded 8.4% sodium bicarbonate suspension had a significantly more aversive taste (mean ± standard deviation: 74 ± 31; median [interquartile range]: 83 [63-100]) and aftertaste (55 ± 33; 61 [23-80]) compared with all licensed formulations (p < 0.001), with bitterness being a prominent attribute. The licensed menthol-flavored 10-mg/15-mL oral solution received the lowest taste aversiveness rating (17 ± 23; 6 [1-19]), and the highest overall acceptability. Other licensed formulations were generally rated as mild to moderately aversive, with some irritating or burning sensations also reported.

Conclusions: A sensory analysis revealed clear differences between compounded and licensed omeprazole formulations, highlighting the importance of developing and prescribing palatable age-appropriate formulations for pediatric populations.

比较感官评价儿科液体奥美拉唑制剂可在英国。
背景:奥美拉唑是一种广泛使用的质子泵抑制剂,用于治疗儿童胃食管反流病和其他酸相关疾病。尽管具有临床重要性,但世界各地获得许可的液体制剂的可用性各不相同,通常导致使用临时复合制剂。这些液体产品具有不同的感觉特性,可以影响患者的接受度。方法:对30名成年志愿者(年龄24±2.6岁,77%为女性)进行随机、单盲感官评价研究,以评估英国6种奥美拉唑液体制剂的适口性。参与者用视觉模拟量表评定味觉、回味、嗅觉和口感的厌恶程度,用5分面部快乐量表评定总体可接受程度,并提供定性反馈。结果:8.4%碳酸氢钠复配悬浮液的苦味(平均±标准差:74±31;中位数[四分位数间距]:83[63-100])和余味(55±33;61[23-80])明显高于所有许可配方(p < 0.001),苦味是其突出特征。许可的薄荷味10 mg/15 ml口服液的味觉厌恶评分最低(17±23;6[1-19]),总体可接受度最高。其他许可的配方通常被评为轻度到中度厌恶,也有一些刺激或烧灼感的报道。结论:感官分析揭示了复方奥美拉唑和许可奥美拉唑制剂之间的明显差异,强调了开发和处方适合儿科人群的适口年龄配方的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书