Bruna De Felice, Ersilia Nigro, Maria Amicone, Antonio Pisani, Aurora Daniele, Federica Farinella
{"title":"miRNA profiling of a mutation-negative PKD cohort reveals PKD1/PKD2 ADPKD shared signatures and differences.","authors":"Bruna De Felice, Ersilia Nigro, Maria Amicone, Antonio Pisani, Aurora Daniele, Federica Farinella","doi":"10.1080/17501911.2026.2652277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is mainly caused by mutations in PKD1 or PKD2 genes, but a subgroup of patients has no detectable mutation and remains understudied. We profiled microRNAs (miRNAs) in this mutation-negative group and compared them with PKD1, PKD2, and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Targeted miRNA profiling was used to measure miRNAs expression. We tested five prespecified contrasts using Welch's two-sided t-test (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For interpretation, experimentally supported miRNA-mRNA interactions were assembled and visualized into networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>miR-92a was found upregulated across all patient-control groups. Interestingly, the mutation-negative cohort showed the broadest deregulation, pointing toward higher expression together with enhanced extracellular-matrix remodeling. PKD1 vs controls displayed a more restricted number of deregulated miRNAs; when PKD1 was compared directly with the mutation-negative group, we observed selective reductions, most notably miR-134-5p. PKD2 vs controls showed fewer changes overall but overlapped with the core signature observed in other groups and no miRNAs met the threshold in PKD2 vs mutation-negative.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results indicate that miRNA dysregulation is present in the absence of identifiable PKD1/PKD2 mutations, supporting the idea of common pathways and highlighting the translational potential of miRNAs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":11959,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomics","volume":" ","pages":"371-383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501911.2026.2652277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is mainly caused by mutations in PKD1 or PKD2 genes, but a subgroup of patients has no detectable mutation and remains understudied. We profiled microRNAs (miRNAs) in this mutation-negative group and compared them with PKD1, PKD2, and healthy controls.
Methods: Targeted miRNA profiling was used to measure miRNAs expression. We tested five prespecified contrasts using Welch's two-sided t-test (p < 0.05). For interpretation, experimentally supported miRNA-mRNA interactions were assembled and visualized into networks.
Results: miR-92a was found upregulated across all patient-control groups. Interestingly, the mutation-negative cohort showed the broadest deregulation, pointing toward higher expression together with enhanced extracellular-matrix remodeling. PKD1 vs controls displayed a more restricted number of deregulated miRNAs; when PKD1 was compared directly with the mutation-negative group, we observed selective reductions, most notably miR-134-5p. PKD2 vs controls showed fewer changes overall but overlapped with the core signature observed in other groups and no miRNAs met the threshold in PKD2 vs mutation-negative.
Discussion: The results indicate that miRNA dysregulation is present in the absence of identifiable PKD1/PKD2 mutations, supporting the idea of common pathways and highlighting the translational potential of miRNAs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.
期刊介绍:
Epigenomics provides the forum to address the rapidly progressing research developments in this ever-expanding field; to report on the major challenges ahead and critical advances that are propelling the science forward. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats – invaluable to a time constrained community.
Substantial developments in our current knowledge and understanding of genomics and epigenetics are constantly being made, yet this field is still in its infancy. Epigenomics provides a critical overview of the latest and most significant advances as they unfold and explores their potential application in the clinical setting.