miRNA profiling of a mutation-negative PKD cohort reveals PKD1/PKD2 ADPKD shared signatures and differences.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Epigenomics Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-02 DOI:10.1080/17501911.2026.2652277
Bruna De Felice, Ersilia Nigro, Maria Amicone, Antonio Pisani, Aurora Daniele, Federica Farinella
{"title":"miRNA profiling of a mutation-negative PKD cohort reveals PKD1/PKD2 ADPKD shared signatures and differences.","authors":"Bruna De Felice, Ersilia Nigro, Maria Amicone, Antonio Pisani, Aurora Daniele, Federica Farinella","doi":"10.1080/17501911.2026.2652277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is mainly caused by mutations in PKD1 or PKD2 genes, but a subgroup of patients has no detectable mutation and remains understudied. We profiled microRNAs (miRNAs) in this mutation-negative group and compared them with PKD1, PKD2, and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Targeted miRNA profiling was used to measure miRNAs expression. We tested five prespecified contrasts using Welch's two-sided t-test (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For interpretation, experimentally supported miRNA-mRNA interactions were assembled and visualized into networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>miR-92a was found upregulated across all patient-control groups. Interestingly, the mutation-negative cohort showed the broadest deregulation, pointing toward higher expression together with enhanced extracellular-matrix remodeling. PKD1 vs controls displayed a more restricted number of deregulated miRNAs; when PKD1 was compared directly with the mutation-negative group, we observed selective reductions, most notably miR-134-5p. PKD2 vs controls showed fewer changes overall but overlapped with the core signature observed in other groups and no miRNAs met the threshold in PKD2 vs mutation-negative.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results indicate that miRNA dysregulation is present in the absence of identifiable PKD1/PKD2 mutations, supporting the idea of common pathways and highlighting the translational potential of miRNAs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":11959,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomics","volume":" ","pages":"371-383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501911.2026.2652277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is mainly caused by mutations in PKD1 or PKD2 genes, but a subgroup of patients has no detectable mutation and remains understudied. We profiled microRNAs (miRNAs) in this mutation-negative group and compared them with PKD1, PKD2, and healthy controls.

Methods: Targeted miRNA profiling was used to measure miRNAs expression. We tested five prespecified contrasts using Welch's two-sided t-test (p < 0.05). For interpretation, experimentally supported miRNA-mRNA interactions were assembled and visualized into networks.

Results: miR-92a was found upregulated across all patient-control groups. Interestingly, the mutation-negative cohort showed the broadest deregulation, pointing toward higher expression together with enhanced extracellular-matrix remodeling. PKD1 vs controls displayed a more restricted number of deregulated miRNAs; when PKD1 was compared directly with the mutation-negative group, we observed selective reductions, most notably miR-134-5p. PKD2 vs controls showed fewer changes overall but overlapped with the core signature observed in other groups and no miRNAs met the threshold in PKD2 vs mutation-negative.

Discussion: The results indicate that miRNA dysregulation is present in the absence of identifiable PKD1/PKD2 mutations, supporting the idea of common pathways and highlighting the translational potential of miRNAs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.

突变阴性PKD队列的miRNA分析显示PKD1/PKD2 ADPKD共享特征和差异。
背景:常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)主要由PKD1或PKD2基因突变引起,但有一亚组患者没有可检测到的突变,仍未得到充分研究。我们分析了该突变阴性组的microRNAs (miRNAs),并将其与PKD1、PKD2和健康对照进行了比较。方法:采用靶向miRNA谱法测定miRNA表达。我们使用Welch双侧t检验检验了五个预先指定的对比(p)结果:miR-92a在所有患者对照组中均上调。有趣的是,突变阴性队列显示出最广泛的解除管制,指向更高的表达和增强的细胞外基质重塑。与对照组相比,PKD1显示出更多数量的不受调节的mirna;当PKD1与突变阴性组直接比较时,我们观察到选择性降低,最明显的是miR-134-5p。PKD2与对照组相比,总体变化较少,但与其他组中观察到的核心特征重叠,PKD2与突变阴性的mirna没有达到阈值。讨论:结果表明,在没有可识别的PKD1/PKD2突变的情况下存在miRNA失调,支持了共同途径的观点,并突出了miRNA作为生物标志物或治疗靶点的翻译潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epigenomics
Epigenomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epigenomics provides the forum to address the rapidly progressing research developments in this ever-expanding field; to report on the major challenges ahead and critical advances that are propelling the science forward. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats – invaluable to a time constrained community. Substantial developments in our current knowledge and understanding of genomics and epigenetics are constantly being made, yet this field is still in its infancy. Epigenomics provides a critical overview of the latest and most significant advances as they unfold and explores their potential application in the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书