Quantitative resource utilisation of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) at a community hospital emergency department (ED) observational controlled study (LEP-ED2 study).

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Matthew Mo Kin Kwok, Rupinder Thandi, Arshpreet Singh Manku, Rebecca Zhu, Janice Castillo
{"title":"Quantitative resource utilisation of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) at a community hospital emergency department (ED) observational controlled study (LEP-ED2 study).","authors":"Matthew Mo Kin Kwok, Rupinder Thandi, Arshpreet Singh Manku, Rebecca Zhu, Janice Castillo","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) face communication barriers that can impact clinical assessment, prolong triage and affect diagnostic decision-making. Our Canadian community teaching hospital serves a linguistically diverse population and sought to understand the operational impact of LEP on emergency department (ED) workflow and resource use.We conducted a prospective observational controlled study (LEPED2) involving adult patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. 31 patients with LEP, identified as needing professional interpreter services, were compared with 43 patients with non-LEP. All patients with LEP received interpretation via a virtual video device. The primary outcome was triage time. Secondary outcomes included the utilisation of CT scans and hospital admission rates. Statistical analyses included one-tailed t-tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests.Patients with LEP required significantly more time for triage (mean 7.76 min) than patients with non-LEP (5.41 min), representing a 43% increase (p=0.0003). Although differences in CT utilisation and admission rates were not statistically significant, a trend towards increased diagnostic testing among patients with LEP was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13052675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) face communication barriers that can impact clinical assessment, prolong triage and affect diagnostic decision-making. Our Canadian community teaching hospital serves a linguistically diverse population and sought to understand the operational impact of LEP on emergency department (ED) workflow and resource use.We conducted a prospective observational controlled study (LEPED2) involving adult patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. 31 patients with LEP, identified as needing professional interpreter services, were compared with 43 patients with non-LEP. All patients with LEP received interpretation via a virtual video device. The primary outcome was triage time. Secondary outcomes included the utilisation of CT scans and hospital admission rates. Statistical analyses included one-tailed t-tests and χ2 tests.Patients with LEP required significantly more time for triage (mean 7.76 min) than patients with non-LEP (5.41 min), representing a 43% increase (p=0.0003). Although differences in CT utilisation and admission rates were not statistically significant, a trend towards increased diagnostic testing among patients with LEP was observed.

一项社区医院急诊科(ED)观察性对照研究(LEP- ed2研究)中英语水平有限(LEP)患者的定量资源利用
英语水平有限(LEP)的患者面临沟通障碍,这会影响临床评估,延长分诊时间并影响诊断决策。我们的加拿大社区教学医院服务于语言多样化的人群,并试图了解LEP对急诊科(ED)工作流程和资源使用的操作影响。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性对照研究(LEPED2),涉及以胸痛向急诊科就诊的成年患者。与43名非LEP患者相比,31名LEP患者被确定为需要专业翻译服务。所有LEP患者均通过虚拟视频设备接受口译。主要结果是分诊时间。次要结局包括CT扫描的使用和住院率。统计分析包括单尾t检验和χ2检验。LEP患者比非LEP患者(5.41分钟)需要更多的分诊时间(平均7.76分钟),增加43% (p=0.0003)。虽然CT使用率和入院率的差异没有统计学意义,但观察到LEP患者中增加诊断检测的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书