Acute spinal cord injury: contemporary management and novel therapies.

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Han-Dong Lee, Nam-Su Chung, Hee-Woong Chung, Jong Min Baik, Dong Sub Im, Hae-Dong Jang
{"title":"Acute spinal cord injury: contemporary management and novel therapies.","authors":"Han-Dong Lee, Nam-Su Chung, Hee-Woong Chung, Jong Min Baik, Dong Sub Im, Hae-Dong Jang","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a life-threatening condition associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability. Despite the advances in trauma systems, surgical techniques, and critical care, the optimal management strategies for acute SCI continue to improve, and clinical practice remains heterogeneous across institutions. The pathophysiology of acute SCI involves an irreversible primary mechanical insult, followed by a dynamic secondary injury cascade characterized by ischemia, inflammation, excitotoxicity, and apoptotic cell death. Early neurological assessments using standardized clinical scales, along with advanced imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, play a crucial role in injury characterization, prognostication, and treatment planning. The contemporary acute management of this condition focuses on the prevention of secondary injury through hemodynamic optimization, early stabilization, and timely surgical decompression. Growing evidence has supported early decompressive surgery, particularly within 24 hours after injury, to improve neurological outcomes. However, the optimal timing, surgical strategy, and patient selection process remain areas of ongoing debate. Pharmacologic neuroprotection, including high-dose methylprednisolone, has become increasingly controversial, while novel agents such as riluzole and minocycline have shown promising but inconclusive results in clinical trials. Beyond conventional management, novel therapeutic approaches-including cell-based therapies, biologics targeting neuroregeneration, neuromodulation, and advanced rehabilitation technologies-have been actively investigated. In parallel, advances in artificial intelligence and predictive modeling are beginning to influence early prognostication and individualized treatment strategies. This review aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding the assessment and management of acute SCI, highlight key controversies, and discuss novel therapies that may shape future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a life-threatening condition associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability. Despite the advances in trauma systems, surgical techniques, and critical care, the optimal management strategies for acute SCI continue to improve, and clinical practice remains heterogeneous across institutions. The pathophysiology of acute SCI involves an irreversible primary mechanical insult, followed by a dynamic secondary injury cascade characterized by ischemia, inflammation, excitotoxicity, and apoptotic cell death. Early neurological assessments using standardized clinical scales, along with advanced imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, play a crucial role in injury characterization, prognostication, and treatment planning. The contemporary acute management of this condition focuses on the prevention of secondary injury through hemodynamic optimization, early stabilization, and timely surgical decompression. Growing evidence has supported early decompressive surgery, particularly within 24 hours after injury, to improve neurological outcomes. However, the optimal timing, surgical strategy, and patient selection process remain areas of ongoing debate. Pharmacologic neuroprotection, including high-dose methylprednisolone, has become increasingly controversial, while novel agents such as riluzole and minocycline have shown promising but inconclusive results in clinical trials. Beyond conventional management, novel therapeutic approaches-including cell-based therapies, biologics targeting neuroregeneration, neuromodulation, and advanced rehabilitation technologies-have been actively investigated. In parallel, advances in artificial intelligence and predictive modeling are beginning to influence early prognostication and individualized treatment strategies. This review aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding the assessment and management of acute SCI, highlight key controversies, and discuss novel therapies that may shape future clinical practice.

急性脊髓损伤:当代管理和新疗法。
急性脊髓损伤(SCI)仍然是一种危及生命的疾病,与大量的发病率、死亡率和长期残疾有关。尽管创伤系统、手术技术和重症监护取得了进步,但急性脊髓损伤的最佳管理策略仍在不断改进,各机构的临床实践仍然存在差异。急性脊髓损伤的病理生理包括不可逆的原发性机械损伤,随后是以缺血、炎症、兴奋毒性和细胞凋亡为特征的动态继发性损伤级联反应。使用标准化临床量表的早期神经系统评估,以及先进的成像,特别是磁共振成像,在损伤表征、预后和治疗计划中起着至关重要的作用。当前对这种情况的急性治疗侧重于通过血流动力学优化、早期稳定和及时手术减压来预防继发性损伤。越来越多的证据支持早期减压手术,特别是在损伤后24小时内,以改善神经系统预后。然而,最佳时机,手术策略和患者选择过程仍然是正在进行辩论的领域。药理学神经保护,包括大剂量甲基强的松龙,已经变得越来越有争议,而新型药物如利鲁唑和米诺环素在临床试验中显示出有希望但不确定的结果。除了传统的治疗方法,新的治疗方法——包括细胞疗法、神经再生生物制剂、神经调节和先进的康复技术——已经被积极研究。与此同时,人工智能和预测建模的进步开始影响早期预测和个性化治疗策略。本综述旨在综合目前关于急性脊髓损伤的评估和管理的证据,突出关键争议,并讨论可能影响未来临床实践的新疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书