Disulfide bond reduction of antibodies during clarification: A bench-scale assay and a mitigation tool

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Biotechnology Progress Pub Date : 2026-08-05 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1002/btpr.88507
Hendri Tjandra, Deepa Surendar, Isu Yoon, Florence Rusly, Yan Su, Vu Thai, Yi Liu, Ashley Hesslein
{"title":"Disulfide bond reduction of antibodies during clarification: A bench-scale assay and a mitigation tool","authors":"Hendri Tjandra,&nbsp;Deepa Surendar,&nbsp;Isu Yoon,&nbsp;Florence Rusly,&nbsp;Yan Su,&nbsp;Vu Thai,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Ashley Hesslein","doi":"10.1002/btpr.88507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated side-by-side clarification with a two-stage depth filter system against a single-stage charge chromatographic clarifier on a number of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell cultures. We found that the one-stage fibrous anion exchange (AEX) clarification met or exceeded the performance of the conventional two-stage depth filtration systems in terms of product recovery, removal of process-related impurities, and throughput. The one-stage anion clarification approach had a smaller footprint, a shorter set-up time, an easier setup, consumed less buffer flush volume, and operated at a lower differential pressure relative to those of conventional systems. In a comparability study at 200 L scale, antibodies in cell culture fluid (CCF) clarified by depth filtration system exhibited product quality degradation due to disulfide bond reduction (DSBR), whereas antibodies clarified by AEX fiber method were not. We surmised that the lower operating differential pressure and electrostatic adsorption mechanism of the anion clarification system minimized the potential of product to undergo DSBR. We developed a bench-scale process model that allowed us to assay DSBR and predict the process results. We then utilized it to demonstrate that the antibody was reduced when clarified with a two-stage 3 M™ Zeta Plus™ Depth Filter system but not with the anionic clarification system. This bench-scale DSBR assay allowed us to rank the relative disulfide bond reduction potentials of various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and demonstrate the reduction-mitigating impacts of the fibrous clarification approach on a reduction-prone antibody culture at 2000 L processing scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13441350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.88507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated side-by-side clarification with a two-stage depth filter system against a single-stage charge chromatographic clarifier on a number of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell cultures. We found that the one-stage fibrous anion exchange (AEX) clarification met or exceeded the performance of the conventional two-stage depth filtration systems in terms of product recovery, removal of process-related impurities, and throughput. The one-stage anion clarification approach had a smaller footprint, a shorter set-up time, an easier setup, consumed less buffer flush volume, and operated at a lower differential pressure relative to those of conventional systems. In a comparability study at 200 L scale, antibodies in cell culture fluid (CCF) clarified by depth filtration system exhibited product quality degradation due to disulfide bond reduction (DSBR), whereas antibodies clarified by AEX fiber method were not. We surmised that the lower operating differential pressure and electrostatic adsorption mechanism of the anion clarification system minimized the potential of product to undergo DSBR. We developed a bench-scale process model that allowed us to assay DSBR and predict the process results. We then utilized it to demonstrate that the antibody was reduced when clarified with a two-stage 3 M™ Zeta Plus™ Depth Filter system but not with the anionic clarification system. This bench-scale DSBR assay allowed us to rank the relative disulfide bond reduction potentials of various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and demonstrate the reduction-mitigating impacts of the fibrous clarification approach on a reduction-prone antibody culture at 2000 L processing scale.

澄清过程中抗体的二硫键减少:一种实验规模的测定和缓解工具。
我们研究了两级深度过滤系统对单级电荷层析澄清器的并排澄清,对中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞培养。我们发现,一级纤维阴离子交换(AEX)澄清在产品回收率、去除工艺相关杂质和吞吐量方面达到或超过了传统的两级深度过滤系统的性能。与传统系统相比,单级阴离子澄清方法占地面积更小,设置时间更短,设置更简单,消耗的缓冲液冲洗量更少,操作压差更低。在200 L的比比性研究中,深度过滤系统澄清的细胞培养液(CCF)中的抗体由于二硫键还原(DSBR)而表现出产品质量下降,而AEX纤维法澄清的抗体则没有。我们推测阴离子澄清系统较低的操作压差和静电吸附机制使产物发生DSBR的可能性最小化。我们开发了一个实验规模的过程模型,使我们能够分析DSBR并预测过程结果。然后,我们利用它来证明,当用两级3m™Zeta Plus™深度过滤系统澄清时,抗体被还原,而阴离子澄清系统则没有。这种实验规模的DSBR试验使我们能够对各种单克隆抗体(mab)的相对二硫键还原电位进行排序,并证明纤维澄清方法在2000 L加工规模下易于还原的抗体培养中具有减轻还原的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotechnology Progress
Biotechnology Progress 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries. Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书