Hendri Tjandra, Deepa Surendar, Isu Yoon, Florence Rusly, Yan Su, Vu Thai, Yi Liu, Ashley Hesslein
{"title":"Disulfide bond reduction of antibodies during clarification: A bench-scale assay and a mitigation tool","authors":"Hendri Tjandra, Deepa Surendar, Isu Yoon, Florence Rusly, Yan Su, Vu Thai, Yi Liu, Ashley Hesslein","doi":"10.1002/btpr.88507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated side-by-side clarification with a two-stage depth filter system against a single-stage charge chromatographic clarifier on a number of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell cultures. We found that the one-stage fibrous anion exchange (AEX) clarification met or exceeded the performance of the conventional two-stage depth filtration systems in terms of product recovery, removal of process-related impurities, and throughput. The one-stage anion clarification approach had a smaller footprint, a shorter set-up time, an easier setup, consumed less buffer flush volume, and operated at a lower differential pressure relative to those of conventional systems. In a comparability study at 200 L scale, antibodies in cell culture fluid (CCF) clarified by depth filtration system exhibited product quality degradation due to disulfide bond reduction (DSBR), whereas antibodies clarified by AEX fiber method were not. We surmised that the lower operating differential pressure and electrostatic adsorption mechanism of the anion clarification system minimized the potential of product to undergo DSBR. We developed a bench-scale process model that allowed us to assay DSBR and predict the process results. We then utilized it to demonstrate that the antibody was reduced when clarified with a two-stage 3 M™ Zeta Plus™ Depth Filter system but not with the anionic clarification system. This bench-scale DSBR assay allowed us to rank the relative disulfide bond reduction potentials of various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and demonstrate the reduction-mitigating impacts of the fibrous clarification approach on a reduction-prone antibody culture at 2000 L processing scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13441350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.88507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated side-by-side clarification with a two-stage depth filter system against a single-stage charge chromatographic clarifier on a number of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell cultures. We found that the one-stage fibrous anion exchange (AEX) clarification met or exceeded the performance of the conventional two-stage depth filtration systems in terms of product recovery, removal of process-related impurities, and throughput. The one-stage anion clarification approach had a smaller footprint, a shorter set-up time, an easier setup, consumed less buffer flush volume, and operated at a lower differential pressure relative to those of conventional systems. In a comparability study at 200 L scale, antibodies in cell culture fluid (CCF) clarified by depth filtration system exhibited product quality degradation due to disulfide bond reduction (DSBR), whereas antibodies clarified by AEX fiber method were not. We surmised that the lower operating differential pressure and electrostatic adsorption mechanism of the anion clarification system minimized the potential of product to undergo DSBR. We developed a bench-scale process model that allowed us to assay DSBR and predict the process results. We then utilized it to demonstrate that the antibody was reduced when clarified with a two-stage 3 M™ Zeta Plus™ Depth Filter system but not with the anionic clarification system. This bench-scale DSBR assay allowed us to rank the relative disulfide bond reduction potentials of various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and demonstrate the reduction-mitigating impacts of the fibrous clarification approach on a reduction-prone antibody culture at 2000 L processing scale.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries.
Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.