Design and In Silico Docking-Guided Synthesis of Novel Aromatic Amides with Potential Anti-Inflammatory Activity

IF 1.7 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Mariam Dawlat Fahmi, Dana Muhammad Hamad Ameen
{"title":"Design and In Silico Docking-Guided Synthesis of Novel Aromatic Amides with Potential Anti-Inflammatory Activity","authors":"Mariam Dawlat Fahmi,&nbsp;Dana Muhammad Hamad Ameen","doi":"10.1134/S1068162025603994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Inflammation is a major contributor to several chronic illnesses, making it an essential target for anti-inflammatory studies. <b>Methods:</b> Using molecular docking, a virtual library of 100 aromatic amides was designed to target cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), leading to the selection of eleven candidates (<b>M1–M11</b>) for synthesis and biological testing. The aromatic amides were synthesized <i>via</i> the Schotten–Baumann reaction, and their pharmacological properties were evaluated. ADME predictions showed Lipinski compliance, high gastrointestinal absorption, and balanced polarity. In vitro COX activity was measured using the Cayman screening kit. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> All candidates demonstrated favorable binding to COX-2, with binding energies ranging from –8.92 to –6.61 kcal/mol. Notably, <b>M10</b> and <b>M7</b> achieved the most favorable docking scores, –8.92 and –8.56 kcal/mol, respectively, while <b>M6</b> showed a stable COX-2 binding mode (–7.14 kcal/mol) and high predicted activity. Compound <b>M6</b> showed IC<sub>50</sub> values of 1.563 µM (COX-1) and 0.461 µM (COX-2), revealing stronger activity compared with indomethacin, for which the corresponding values were 1.96 and 25.98 µM. Additionally, <b>M7</b> and <b>M11</b> exhibited the highest COX-2 selectivity indices (13.533 and 12.097, respectively), while <b>M10</b> showed good dual potency with low COX-2 selectivity (2.331). Structure–activity relationship analysis indicates that COX-2 preference and potency in <b>M6</b>, <b>M7</b>, and <b>M11</b> are mainly driven by fused or extended aromatic systems and hydrogen-bonding features. The strong agreement between the docking-predicted binding affinities and the experimentally determined IC<sub>50</sub> values confirms that the theoretical model accurately reflected the biological behavior of the synthesized amides. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, these amides are promising enzyme inhibitors with favorable pharmacokinetic profiles. Although their assay results are still below those of celecoxib, they support further optimization to enhance COX-2 selectivity, as most outperform indomethacin.</p>","PeriodicalId":758,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1068162025603994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Inflammation is a major contributor to several chronic illnesses, making it an essential target for anti-inflammatory studies. Methods: Using molecular docking, a virtual library of 100 aromatic amides was designed to target cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), leading to the selection of eleven candidates (M1–M11) for synthesis and biological testing. The aromatic amides were synthesized via the Schotten–Baumann reaction, and their pharmacological properties were evaluated. ADME predictions showed Lipinski compliance, high gastrointestinal absorption, and balanced polarity. In vitro COX activity was measured using the Cayman screening kit. Results and Discussion: All candidates demonstrated favorable binding to COX-2, with binding energies ranging from –8.92 to –6.61 kcal/mol. Notably, M10 and M7 achieved the most favorable docking scores, –8.92 and –8.56 kcal/mol, respectively, while M6 showed a stable COX-2 binding mode (–7.14 kcal/mol) and high predicted activity. Compound M6 showed IC50 values of 1.563 µM (COX-1) and 0.461 µM (COX-2), revealing stronger activity compared with indomethacin, for which the corresponding values were 1.96 and 25.98 µM. Additionally, M7 and M11 exhibited the highest COX-2 selectivity indices (13.533 and 12.097, respectively), while M10 showed good dual potency with low COX-2 selectivity (2.331). Structure–activity relationship analysis indicates that COX-2 preference and potency in M6, M7, and M11 are mainly driven by fused or extended aromatic systems and hydrogen-bonding features. The strong agreement between the docking-predicted binding affinities and the experimentally determined IC50 values confirms that the theoretical model accurately reflected the biological behavior of the synthesized amides. Conclusions: Overall, these amides are promising enzyme inhibitors with favorable pharmacokinetic profiles. Although their assay results are still below those of celecoxib, they support further optimization to enhance COX-2 selectivity, as most outperform indomethacin.

Abstract Image

具有潜在抗炎活性的新型芳香族酰胺的设计与硅对接合成
目的:炎症是几种慢性疾病的主要诱因,使其成为抗炎研究的重要目标。方法:采用分子对接的方法,以环氧化酶-2 (COX-2)为靶点,设计100种芳香族酰胺虚拟文库,筛选出11种候选化合物(M1-M11)进行合成和生物学检测。通过Schotten-Baumann反应合成了芳香族酰胺,并对其药理性质进行了评价。ADME预测显示利平斯基依从性,高胃肠道吸收和平衡极性。采用Cayman筛选试剂盒测定体外COX活性。结果和讨论:所有候选物质均与COX-2结合良好,结合能范围为-8.92 ~ -6.61 kcal/mol。值得注意的是,M10和M7获得了最有利的对接分数,分别为-8.92和-8.56 kcal/mol,而M6表现出稳定的COX-2结合模式(-7.14 kcal/mol)和较高的预测活性。化合物M6的IC50值分别为1.563µM (COX-1)和0.461µM (COX-2),与吲哚美辛的IC50值分别为1.96和25.98µM相比,活性更强。M7和M11对COX-2的选择性指数最高(分别为13.533和12.097),而M10对COX-2的选择性较低(2.331),具有良好的双效性。构效关系分析表明,M6、M7和M11对COX-2的偏好和效价主要受融合或扩展芳香体系和氢键特征的驱动。对接预测的结合亲和力与实验测定的IC50值之间的强烈一致性证实了理论模型准确地反映了合成酰胺的生物学行为。结论:总的来说,这些酰胺是有希望的酶抑制剂,具有良好的药代动力学特征。虽然它们的测定结果仍然低于塞来昔布,但它们支持进一步优化以提高COX-2的选择性,因为大多数都优于吲哚美辛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry publishes reviews and original experimental and theoretical studies on the structure, function, structure–activity relationships, and synthesis of biopolymers, such as proteins, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, mixed biopolymers, and their complexes, and low-molecular-weight biologically active compounds (peptides, sugars, lipids, antibiotics, etc.). The journal also covers selected aspects of neuro- and immunochemistry, biotechnology, and ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书