{"title":"Circuit-based vs. measurement-based quantum computing: a comparative analysis, layered metrics, and decision flow for approach selection","authors":"Harashta Tatimma Larasati, Byung-Soo Choi","doi":"10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Circuit-based quantum computing (CBQC), also known as the gate model, is currently regarded as the leading paradigm for performing quantum computation and has garnered widespread interest due to its relatively better-established implementation and close intuitive resemblance to classical computation. However, an alternative model that solely utilizes single-qubit measurements on entangled states to perform computation, namely the measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), has started to attract further research interest as it is deemed more naturally suited for certain quantum hardware architectures, though its actual implementation remains largely underexplored. Recently, there have been preliminary efforts to characterize the specific regimes in which MBQC may potentially be more advantageous compared to CBQC. Nevertheless, a more systematic assessment is necessary to assess the suitability of each model across a broader range of more practical cases. In this work, we present a detailed comparative analysis of CBQC and MBQC, beginning with reviewing the theoretical foundations of each model before highlighting its distinguishing features that set the two paradigms apart. Furthermore, building on previous work, we propose a generalized regime analysis that more accurately captures the conditions under which a given quantum algorithm is more favorably executed in MBQC or CBQC. Subsequently, we identify critical parameters that likely determine whether a quantum algorithm is better suited to CBQC or MBQC, categorizing detailed key factors and performance metrics into layers of quantum computation. Next, we propose a decision flow that, given specific hardware constraints and algorithm requirements, guides the selection to the most appropriate model, discussing suitability in two representative worked examples of quantum algorithm applications: Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQE). Last, we discuss the potential to combine both models as a hybrid approach to leverage the best of both worlds and explore its benefits for practical quantum computing applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":547,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Quantum Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Quantum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Circuit-based quantum computing (CBQC), also known as the gate model, is currently regarded as the leading paradigm for performing quantum computation and has garnered widespread interest due to its relatively better-established implementation and close intuitive resemblance to classical computation. However, an alternative model that solely utilizes single-qubit measurements on entangled states to perform computation, namely the measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), has started to attract further research interest as it is deemed more naturally suited for certain quantum hardware architectures, though its actual implementation remains largely underexplored. Recently, there have been preliminary efforts to characterize the specific regimes in which MBQC may potentially be more advantageous compared to CBQC. Nevertheless, a more systematic assessment is necessary to assess the suitability of each model across a broader range of more practical cases. In this work, we present a detailed comparative analysis of CBQC and MBQC, beginning with reviewing the theoretical foundations of each model before highlighting its distinguishing features that set the two paradigms apart. Furthermore, building on previous work, we propose a generalized regime analysis that more accurately captures the conditions under which a given quantum algorithm is more favorably executed in MBQC or CBQC. Subsequently, we identify critical parameters that likely determine whether a quantum algorithm is better suited to CBQC or MBQC, categorizing detailed key factors and performance metrics into layers of quantum computation. Next, we propose a decision flow that, given specific hardware constraints and algorithm requirements, guides the selection to the most appropriate model, discussing suitability in two representative worked examples of quantum algorithm applications: Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQE). Last, we discuss the potential to combine both models as a hybrid approach to leverage the best of both worlds and explore its benefits for practical quantum computing applications.
期刊介绍:
Driven by advances in technology and experimental capability, the last decade has seen the emergence of quantum technology: a new praxis for controlling the quantum world. It is now possible to engineer complex, multi-component systems that merge the once distinct fields of quantum optics and condensed matter physics.
EPJ Quantum Technology covers theoretical and experimental advances in subjects including but not limited to the following:
Quantum measurement, metrology and lithography
Quantum complex systems, networks and cellular automata
Quantum electromechanical systems
Quantum optomechanical systems
Quantum machines, engineering and nanorobotics
Quantum control theory
Quantum information, communication and computation
Quantum thermodynamics
Quantum metamaterials
The effect of Casimir forces on micro- and nano-electromechanical systems
Quantum biology
Quantum sensing
Hybrid quantum systems
Quantum simulations.