Circuit-based vs. measurement-based quantum computing: a comparative analysis, layered metrics, and decision flow for approach selection

IF 4.5 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 OPTICS
EPJ Quantum Technology Pub Date : 2026-02-27 Epub Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1
Harashta Tatimma Larasati, Byung-Soo Choi
{"title":"Circuit-based vs. measurement-based quantum computing: a comparative analysis, layered metrics, and decision flow for approach selection","authors":"Harashta Tatimma Larasati,&nbsp;Byung-Soo Choi","doi":"10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Circuit-based quantum computing (CBQC), also known as the gate model, is currently regarded as the leading paradigm for performing quantum computation and has garnered widespread interest due to its relatively better-established implementation and close intuitive resemblance to classical computation. However, an alternative model that solely utilizes single-qubit measurements on entangled states to perform computation, namely the measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), has started to attract further research interest as it is deemed more naturally suited for certain quantum hardware architectures, though its actual implementation remains largely underexplored. Recently, there have been preliminary efforts to characterize the specific regimes in which MBQC may potentially be more advantageous compared to CBQC. Nevertheless, a more systematic assessment is necessary to assess the suitability of each model across a broader range of more practical cases. In this work, we present a detailed comparative analysis of CBQC and MBQC, beginning with reviewing the theoretical foundations of each model before highlighting its distinguishing features that set the two paradigms apart. Furthermore, building on previous work, we propose a generalized regime analysis that more accurately captures the conditions under which a given quantum algorithm is more favorably executed in MBQC or CBQC. Subsequently, we identify critical parameters that likely determine whether a quantum algorithm is better suited to CBQC or MBQC, categorizing detailed key factors and performance metrics into layers of quantum computation. Next, we propose a decision flow that, given specific hardware constraints and algorithm requirements, guides the selection to the most appropriate model, discussing suitability in two representative worked examples of quantum algorithm applications: Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQE). Last, we discuss the potential to combine both models as a hybrid approach to leverage the best of both worlds and explore its benefits for practical quantum computing applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":547,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Quantum Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Quantum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circuit-based quantum computing (CBQC), also known as the gate model, is currently regarded as the leading paradigm for performing quantum computation and has garnered widespread interest due to its relatively better-established implementation and close intuitive resemblance to classical computation. However, an alternative model that solely utilizes single-qubit measurements on entangled states to perform computation, namely the measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), has started to attract further research interest as it is deemed more naturally suited for certain quantum hardware architectures, though its actual implementation remains largely underexplored. Recently, there have been preliminary efforts to characterize the specific regimes in which MBQC may potentially be more advantageous compared to CBQC. Nevertheless, a more systematic assessment is necessary to assess the suitability of each model across a broader range of more practical cases. In this work, we present a detailed comparative analysis of CBQC and MBQC, beginning with reviewing the theoretical foundations of each model before highlighting its distinguishing features that set the two paradigms apart. Furthermore, building on previous work, we propose a generalized regime analysis that more accurately captures the conditions under which a given quantum algorithm is more favorably executed in MBQC or CBQC. Subsequently, we identify critical parameters that likely determine whether a quantum algorithm is better suited to CBQC or MBQC, categorizing detailed key factors and performance metrics into layers of quantum computation. Next, we propose a decision flow that, given specific hardware constraints and algorithm requirements, guides the selection to the most appropriate model, discussing suitability in two representative worked examples of quantum algorithm applications: Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQE). Last, we discuss the potential to combine both models as a hybrid approach to leverage the best of both worlds and explore its benefits for practical quantum computing applications.

基于电路与基于测量的量子计算:方法选择的比较分析、分层度量和决策流
基于电路的量子计算(CBQC),也被称为门模型,目前被认为是执行量子计算的主要范式,由于其相对更好的实现和与经典计算的密切直观相似性而获得了广泛的兴趣。然而,另一种仅利用纠缠态上的单量子位测量来执行计算的替代模型,即基于测量的量子计算(MBQC),已经开始吸引进一步的研究兴趣,因为它被认为更自然地适合某些量子硬件架构,尽管其实际实现在很大程度上仍未得到充分探索。最近,已经有初步的努力来描述MBQC可能比CBQC更有利的具体制度。然而,更系统的评估是必要的,以评估每个模型在更广泛的更实际的情况下的适用性。在本文中,我们对CBQC和MBQC进行了详细的比较分析,首先回顾了每个模型的理论基础,然后突出了两个范式之间的区别。此外,在先前工作的基础上,我们提出了一种广义的状态分析,可以更准确地捕获在MBQC或CBQC中更有利地执行给定量子算法的条件。随后,我们确定了可能决定量子算法是否更适合CBQC或MBQC的关键参数,将详细的关键因素和性能指标分类到量子计算层中。接下来,我们提出了一个决策流程,在给定特定硬件约束和算法要求的情况下,指导选择最合适的模型,并在量子算法应用的两个代表性工作示例中讨论了适用性:量子傅立叶变换(QFT)和变分量子算法(VQE)。最后,我们讨论了将这两种模型结合为一种混合方法的潜力,以利用两者的优点,并探索其对实际量子计算应用的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EPJ Quantum Technology
EPJ Quantum Technology Physics and Astronomy-Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Driven by advances in technology and experimental capability, the last decade has seen the emergence of quantum technology: a new praxis for controlling the quantum world. It is now possible to engineer complex, multi-component systems that merge the once distinct fields of quantum optics and condensed matter physics. EPJ Quantum Technology covers theoretical and experimental advances in subjects including but not limited to the following: Quantum measurement, metrology and lithography Quantum complex systems, networks and cellular automata Quantum electromechanical systems Quantum optomechanical systems Quantum machines, engineering and nanorobotics Quantum control theory Quantum information, communication and computation Quantum thermodynamics Quantum metamaterials The effect of Casimir forces on micro- and nano-electromechanical systems Quantum biology Quantum sensing Hybrid quantum systems Quantum simulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书