Innovating together: outcomes from an integrated technical-experiential-social agricultural climate adaptation education program

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sara Delaney, Rachel E. Schattman, Janica Anderzén, Ivan Fernandez
{"title":"Innovating together: outcomes from an integrated technical-experiential-social agricultural climate adaptation education program","authors":"Sara Delaney,&nbsp;Rachel E. Schattman,&nbsp;Janica Anderzén,&nbsp;Ivan Fernandez","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10857-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Agricultural advising services are called to support farmers in their adaptation to a changing climate. This area is under rapid development, yet there is still an unmet need. To lay a foundation for this work, we need a thorough understanding of how farmers learn, how advisors and farmers interact, and what influences behavioral change. To address these needs, we utilized the 2020–21 Climate Adaptation Fellowship (CAF) Vegetable and Small Fruit Program, which supported farmers and advisors in the Northeast United States. Here, we report on the results that emerged from the fellowship’s learning model. The model included technical, experiential, and social learning pathways as well as space for farmers and advisors to learn and experiment together. We term this an Integrated Technical-Experiential-Social Model. Data from a 3-year period, including two years post-program, shows that the social learning pathway contributed extensive synergistic drivers for participants’ behavior change. Technical and experiential components provided essential complementary influences, and the three pathways together led to near universal adaptation-related behavior change. While no single behavior can be attributed to the program, participants describe a range of adaptive practices and iterative experimentation, and a desire to continue learning and collaborating. Participants noted increases in perceived self-efficacy, specifically efficacy to innovate. The program also facilitated collective efficacy, accountability and social norms. The most interactive participants experienced a reinforcing cycle that further increased learning and efficacy. This research highlights the role of integrated educational programs in facilitating adaptation and suggests strategies to foster learning within and outside organized programming.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-026-10857-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural advising services are called to support farmers in their adaptation to a changing climate. This area is under rapid development, yet there is still an unmet need. To lay a foundation for this work, we need a thorough understanding of how farmers learn, how advisors and farmers interact, and what influences behavioral change. To address these needs, we utilized the 2020–21 Climate Adaptation Fellowship (CAF) Vegetable and Small Fruit Program, which supported farmers and advisors in the Northeast United States. Here, we report on the results that emerged from the fellowship’s learning model. The model included technical, experiential, and social learning pathways as well as space for farmers and advisors to learn and experiment together. We term this an Integrated Technical-Experiential-Social Model. Data from a 3-year period, including two years post-program, shows that the social learning pathway contributed extensive synergistic drivers for participants’ behavior change. Technical and experiential components provided essential complementary influences, and the three pathways together led to near universal adaptation-related behavior change. While no single behavior can be attributed to the program, participants describe a range of adaptive practices and iterative experimentation, and a desire to continue learning and collaborating. Participants noted increases in perceived self-efficacy, specifically efficacy to innovate. The program also facilitated collective efficacy, accountability and social norms. The most interactive participants experienced a reinforcing cycle that further increased learning and efficacy. This research highlights the role of integrated educational programs in facilitating adaptation and suggests strategies to foster learning within and outside organized programming.

共同创新:综合技术-经验-社会农业气候适应教育项目的成果
呼吁提供农业咨询服务,以支持农民适应不断变化的气候。这一地区正在迅速发展,但仍有一些需求未得到满足。为了为这项工作奠定基础,我们需要彻底了解农民如何学习,顾问和农民如何互动,以及影响行为变化的因素。为了满足这些需求,我们利用了2020-21气候适应奖学金(CAF)蔬菜和小水果项目,该项目为美国东北部的农民和顾问提供支持。在这里,我们报告了奖学金学习模式产生的结果。该模型包括技术、经验和社会学习途径,以及农民和顾问共同学习和实验的空间。我们称之为技术-经验-社会综合模型。为期3年的数据,包括项目后两年的数据,表明社会学习途径对参与者的行为改变有广泛的协同驱动作用。技术和经验因素提供了基本的互补影响,这三种途径共同导致了几乎普遍的与适应有关的行为变化。虽然没有单一的行为可以归因于该计划,但参与者描述了一系列适应性实践和迭代实验,以及继续学习和合作的愿望。参与者注意到自我效能感的提高,特别是创新效能。该项目还促进了集体效能、问责制和社会规范。互动最多的参与者经历了一个强化循环,进一步提高了学习和效率。本研究强调了综合教育项目在促进适应方面的作用,并提出了在有组织的项目内外促进学习的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书