Customary forests as models of traditional agroforestry: ethnobotany of wild edible plants in the Dayak Sisang forest, Indonesia

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Efriani Efriani, Afandi Afandi, Dede Mulyanto, Shofia Az Zahra Aulia, Aswan Reza, Krissusandi Gunui
{"title":"Customary forests as models of traditional agroforestry: ethnobotany of wild edible plants in the Dayak Sisang forest, Indonesia","authors":"Efriani Efriani,&nbsp;Afandi Afandi,&nbsp;Dede Mulyanto,&nbsp;Shofia Az Zahra Aulia,&nbsp;Aswan Reza,&nbsp;Krissusandi Gunui","doi":"10.1007/s10457-026-01487-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Customary forests in Indonesia are often treated simply as “forest” land cover, yet many function as bioculturally managed, tree-based mosaics that resemble traditional agroforestry in both structure and provisioning. In the Dayak Sisang customary territory (West Kalimantan), wild edible plants (WEP) constitute a key provisioning service linking biodiversity, food security, and customary governance; however, land-use conversion and socio-economic pressures threaten WEP resources and local botanical knowledge. This study documents WEP diversity and examines how WEP provisioning helps sustain customary forest landscapes as living models of traditional agroforestry. We employed an ethnographic design combined with ethnobotanical methods, including in-depth interviews with 53 key informants and participatory forest walks to collect WEP specimens. We recorded 103 WEP species from 48 families, dominated by Arecaceae (8.74%), Moraceae (7.77%), Sapindaceae (7.77%), and Zingiberaceae (5.83%). Fruits were the most frequently used plant part (46.60%), and whole-plant foods were mostly consumed raw (63.10%). Trees were the dominant growth form (~ 50%). Spatially, WEP richness was concentrated in sacred forest (69/103 species; 66.99%), complemented by mixed gardens (21 species; 20.39%), homegardens (12 species; 11.65%), and shifting cultivation areas (1 species; 0.97%). These patterns indicate a customary management logic that combines core habitat protection with access-oriented distribution across managed spaces—features consistent with forest-like agroforestry rooted in long-lived woody components. Framing WEP provisioning within customary governance advances agroforestry research by clarifying how customary institutions sustain provisioning services while conserving forest structure and biocultural values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"100 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-026-01487-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Customary forests in Indonesia are often treated simply as “forest” land cover, yet many function as bioculturally managed, tree-based mosaics that resemble traditional agroforestry in both structure and provisioning. In the Dayak Sisang customary territory (West Kalimantan), wild edible plants (WEP) constitute a key provisioning service linking biodiversity, food security, and customary governance; however, land-use conversion and socio-economic pressures threaten WEP resources and local botanical knowledge. This study documents WEP diversity and examines how WEP provisioning helps sustain customary forest landscapes as living models of traditional agroforestry. We employed an ethnographic design combined with ethnobotanical methods, including in-depth interviews with 53 key informants and participatory forest walks to collect WEP specimens. We recorded 103 WEP species from 48 families, dominated by Arecaceae (8.74%), Moraceae (7.77%), Sapindaceae (7.77%), and Zingiberaceae (5.83%). Fruits were the most frequently used plant part (46.60%), and whole-plant foods were mostly consumed raw (63.10%). Trees were the dominant growth form (~ 50%). Spatially, WEP richness was concentrated in sacred forest (69/103 species; 66.99%), complemented by mixed gardens (21 species; 20.39%), homegardens (12 species; 11.65%), and shifting cultivation areas (1 species; 0.97%). These patterns indicate a customary management logic that combines core habitat protection with access-oriented distribution across managed spaces—features consistent with forest-like agroforestry rooted in long-lived woody components. Framing WEP provisioning within customary governance advances agroforestry research by clarifying how customary institutions sustain provisioning services while conserving forest structure and biocultural values.

作为传统农林业模式的习惯森林:印度尼西亚达亚克西桑森林野生食用植物的民族植物学
印度尼西亚的传统森林通常被简单地视为“森林”土地覆盖,但许多森林的功能是生物栽培管理,以树木为基础的马赛克,在结构和供应方面与传统农林业相似。在达亚克Sisang习惯领土(西加里曼丹),野生可食用植物(WEP)是连接生物多样性、粮食安全和习惯治理的关键供应服务;然而,土地利用转换和社会经济压力威胁着WEP资源和当地植物知识。本研究记录了WEP的多样性,并考察了WEP供应如何帮助维持传统农林业的生活模式。我们采用民族志设计与民族植物学方法相结合的方法,包括对53名关键线人的深度访谈和参与式森林漫步来收集WEP标本。共记录到48科103种WEP,以槟榔科(8.74%)、桑科(7.77%)、皂荚科(7.77%)和姜科(5.83%)为主。水果是最常食用的植物部分(46.60%),全植物性食物以生食为主(63.10%)。乔木是主要的生长形式(约50%)。从空间上看,WEP丰富度主要集中在圣林区(69/103种,66.99%),其次是混合花园(21种,20.39%)、家庭花园(12种,11.65%)和流动耕地(1种,0.97%)。这些模式表明了一种习惯的管理逻辑,将核心栖息地保护与跨管理空间的以可及性为导向的分布相结合,其特征与植根于长期木质成分的森林式农林业相一致。将WEP的供应纳入习惯治理框架,通过澄清习惯机构如何在保护森林结构和生物文化价值的同时维持供应服务,推进农林业研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书