Maya Fishbach, Katelyn Breivik, Reinhold Willcox, L. A. C. van Son
{"title":"Where are Gaia’s small black holes?","authors":"Maya Fishbach, Katelyn Breivik, Reinhold Willcox, L. A. C. van Son","doi":"10.1007/s10509-026-04554-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><i>Gaia</i> has recently revealed a population of over 20 compact objects in wide astrometric binaries, while LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) have observed around 100 compact object binaries as gravitational-wave (GW) mergers. Despite belonging to different systems, the compact objects discovered by both <i>Gaia</i> and the LVK follow a multimodal mass distribution, with a global maximum at neutron star (NS) masses (<span>\\(\\sim 1\\)</span>–<span>\\(2\\,M_{\\odot }\\)</span>) and a secondary local maximum at black hole (BH) masses <span>\\(\\sim 10\\,M_{\\odot }\\)</span>. However, the relative dearth of objects, or “mass gap,” between these modes is more pronounced among the wide binaries observed by <i>Gaia</i> compared to the GW population, with <span>\\(9^{+10}_{-6}\\%\\)</span> of GW component masses falling between 2.5–<span>\\(5\\,M_{\\odot }\\)</span> compared to <span>\\(\\lesssim 5\\%\\)</span> of <i>Gaia</i> compact objects. We explore whether this discrepancy can be explained by the natal kicks received by low-mass BHs. GW progenitor binaries may be more likely to survive natal kicks, because the newborn BH has a more massive companion and/or is in a tighter binary than <i>Gaia</i> progenitor binaries. We compare the survival probabilities of <i>Gaia</i> and GW progenitor binaries as a function of natal kick strength and pre-supernova binary parameters, and map out the parameter space and kick strength required to disrupt the progenitor binaries leading to low-mass BHs in <i>Gaia</i> systems more frequently than those in GW systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"371 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-026-04554-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gaia has recently revealed a population of over 20 compact objects in wide astrometric binaries, while LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) have observed around 100 compact object binaries as gravitational-wave (GW) mergers. Despite belonging to different systems, the compact objects discovered by both Gaia and the LVK follow a multimodal mass distribution, with a global maximum at neutron star (NS) masses (\(\sim 1\)–\(2\,M_{\odot }\)) and a secondary local maximum at black hole (BH) masses \(\sim 10\,M_{\odot }\). However, the relative dearth of objects, or “mass gap,” between these modes is more pronounced among the wide binaries observed by Gaia compared to the GW population, with \(9^{+10}_{-6}\%\) of GW component masses falling between 2.5–\(5\,M_{\odot }\) compared to \(\lesssim 5\%\) of Gaia compact objects. We explore whether this discrepancy can be explained by the natal kicks received by low-mass BHs. GW progenitor binaries may be more likely to survive natal kicks, because the newborn BH has a more massive companion and/or is in a tighter binary than Gaia progenitor binaries. We compare the survival probabilities of Gaia and GW progenitor binaries as a function of natal kick strength and pre-supernova binary parameters, and map out the parameter space and kick strength required to disrupt the progenitor binaries leading to low-mass BHs in Gaia systems more frequently than those in GW systems.
期刊介绍:
Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered.
The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing.
Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.