Where are Gaia’s small black holes?

IF 2.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Maya Fishbach, Katelyn Breivik, Reinhold Willcox, L. A. C. van Son
{"title":"Where are Gaia’s small black holes?","authors":"Maya Fishbach,&nbsp;Katelyn Breivik,&nbsp;Reinhold Willcox,&nbsp;L. A. C. van Son","doi":"10.1007/s10509-026-04554-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><i>Gaia</i> has recently revealed a population of over 20 compact objects in wide astrometric binaries, while LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) have observed around 100 compact object binaries as gravitational-wave (GW) mergers. Despite belonging to different systems, the compact objects discovered by both <i>Gaia</i> and the LVK follow a multimodal mass distribution, with a global maximum at neutron star (NS) masses (<span>\\(\\sim 1\\)</span>–<span>\\(2\\,M_{\\odot }\\)</span>) and a secondary local maximum at black hole (BH) masses <span>\\(\\sim 10\\,M_{\\odot }\\)</span>. However, the relative dearth of objects, or “mass gap,” between these modes is more pronounced among the wide binaries observed by <i>Gaia</i> compared to the GW population, with <span>\\(9^{+10}_{-6}\\%\\)</span> of GW component masses falling between 2.5–<span>\\(5\\,M_{\\odot }\\)</span> compared to <span>\\(\\lesssim 5\\%\\)</span> of <i>Gaia</i> compact objects. We explore whether this discrepancy can be explained by the natal kicks received by low-mass BHs. GW progenitor binaries may be more likely to survive natal kicks, because the newborn BH has a more massive companion and/or is in a tighter binary than <i>Gaia</i> progenitor binaries. We compare the survival probabilities of <i>Gaia</i> and GW progenitor binaries as a function of natal kick strength and pre-supernova binary parameters, and map out the parameter space and kick strength required to disrupt the progenitor binaries leading to low-mass BHs in <i>Gaia</i> systems more frequently than those in GW systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"371 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-026-04554-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gaia has recently revealed a population of over 20 compact objects in wide astrometric binaries, while LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) have observed around 100 compact object binaries as gravitational-wave (GW) mergers. Despite belonging to different systems, the compact objects discovered by both Gaia and the LVK follow a multimodal mass distribution, with a global maximum at neutron star (NS) masses (\(\sim 1\)–\(2\,M_{\odot }\)) and a secondary local maximum at black hole (BH) masses \(\sim 10\,M_{\odot }\). However, the relative dearth of objects, or “mass gap,” between these modes is more pronounced among the wide binaries observed by Gaia compared to the GW population, with \(9^{+10}_{-6}\%\) of GW component masses falling between 2.5–\(5\,M_{\odot }\) compared to \(\lesssim 5\%\) of Gaia compact objects. We explore whether this discrepancy can be explained by the natal kicks received by low-mass BHs. GW progenitor binaries may be more likely to survive natal kicks, because the newborn BH has a more massive companion and/or is in a tighter binary than Gaia progenitor binaries. We compare the survival probabilities of Gaia and GW progenitor binaries as a function of natal kick strength and pre-supernova binary parameters, and map out the parameter space and kick strength required to disrupt the progenitor binaries leading to low-mass BHs in Gaia systems more frequently than those in GW systems.

盖亚的小黑洞在哪里?
盖亚最近发现了20多个密集的天体,而LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK)观测到大约100个密集的天体双星作为引力波(GW)合并。尽管属于不同的系统,盖亚和LVK发现的致密天体都遵循多模态质量分布,全球最大质量为中子星(NS)质量(\(\sim 1\) - \(2\,M_{\odot }\)),次局部最大质量为黑洞(BH)质量\(\sim 10\,M_{\odot }\)。然而,与Gaia观测到的GW密度相比,这些模式之间相对缺乏的物体,或“质量缺口”在Gaia观测到的宽双星中更为明显,与Gaia致密天体的\(\lesssim 5\%\)相比,GW组成质量的\(9^{+10}_{-6}\%\)在2.5 - \(5\,M_{\odot }\)之间。我们探索这种差异是否可以用低质量黑洞的出生踢踢来解释。GW祖先双星可能更有可能在出生后的撞击中幸存下来,因为新生的BH有一个更大质量的伴星和/或比盖亚祖先双星更紧密。我们比较了盖亚和GW双星的生存概率作为出生踢强度和超新星前双星参数的函数,并绘制了破坏祖先双星所需的参数空间和踢强度,从而导致盖亚系统比GW系统更频繁地发生低质量黑洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astrophysics and Space Science
Astrophysics and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered. The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing. Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书