Pathways to ecological sustainability in the United States: assessing the role of policy stringency and green energy using wavelet quantile correlation

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Sciences Europe Pub Date : 2026-02-27 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1186/s12302-026-01351-6
Solomon Prince Nathaniel, Emmanuel Uche, Mamello Amelia Nchake, Magdalena Radulescu
{"title":"Pathways to ecological sustainability in the United States: assessing the role of policy stringency and green energy using wavelet quantile correlation","authors":"Solomon Prince Nathaniel,&nbsp;Emmanuel Uche,&nbsp;Mamello Amelia Nchake,&nbsp;Magdalena Radulescu","doi":"10.1186/s12302-026-01351-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The United States ranks among the most developed countries in the world in terms of economic development, technological innovation, and human capital development. Furthermore, the US is among the countries with the largest ecological footprint (EFP), with its EFP per capita higher than the global average. This questions the stringency of environmental policies in the US as well as the role of green energy in alleviating the country’s ecological well-being. The objective of this study is to scrutinize the association between environmental policy stringency (EPS), green energy, and EFP in the United States. To achieve this, innovative methodologies (namely, wavelet quantile correlation and the causality approach) are employed, utilizing data from 1990 to 2022. The findings reveal that EPS warrants a substantial reduction in the EFP in the US. Although notable heterogeneous effects exist, the evidence suggests a strong negative relationship between EPS and EFP. Akin to the impact of EPS, green energy consumption produces a varying negative and positive impact on EFP over the distributions. Nevertheless, a critical observation herein is the predominant negative contribution of green energy consumption to EFP. Except in the lowest and uppermost quantiles, the contributions of green energy thereafter remain insufficient to engender ecological sustainability. Further findings reveal that both green energy and EPS significantly Granger-caused EFP across the time and quantile dimensions. Thus, this research highlights that policymakers consider a combination of market tools such as emission limits, carbon pricing, and waste reduction to optimize environmental outcomes and alleviate environmental stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-026-01351-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-026-01351-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States ranks among the most developed countries in the world in terms of economic development, technological innovation, and human capital development. Furthermore, the US is among the countries with the largest ecological footprint (EFP), with its EFP per capita higher than the global average. This questions the stringency of environmental policies in the US as well as the role of green energy in alleviating the country’s ecological well-being. The objective of this study is to scrutinize the association between environmental policy stringency (EPS), green energy, and EFP in the United States. To achieve this, innovative methodologies (namely, wavelet quantile correlation and the causality approach) are employed, utilizing data from 1990 to 2022. The findings reveal that EPS warrants a substantial reduction in the EFP in the US. Although notable heterogeneous effects exist, the evidence suggests a strong negative relationship between EPS and EFP. Akin to the impact of EPS, green energy consumption produces a varying negative and positive impact on EFP over the distributions. Nevertheless, a critical observation herein is the predominant negative contribution of green energy consumption to EFP. Except in the lowest and uppermost quantiles, the contributions of green energy thereafter remain insufficient to engender ecological sustainability. Further findings reveal that both green energy and EPS significantly Granger-caused EFP across the time and quantile dimensions. Thus, this research highlights that policymakers consider a combination of market tools such as emission limits, carbon pricing, and waste reduction to optimize environmental outcomes and alleviate environmental stress.

美国的生态可持续性之路:用小波分位数相关性评估政策严谨性和绿色能源的作用
美国在经济发展、技术创新、人力资本开发等方面都是世界上最发达的国家之一。此外,美国是生态足迹(EFP)最大的国家之一,人均EFP高于全球平均水平。这对美国环境政策的严格程度以及绿色能源在缓解美国生态健康方面的作用提出了质疑。本研究的目的是检视美国环境政策严格度(EPS)、绿色能源和EFP之间的关系。为了实现这一目标,采用了创新的方法(即小波分位数相关性和因果关系方法),利用了1990年至2022年的数据。研究结果表明,EPS保证了美国EFP的大幅减少。尽管存在显著的异质性效应,但有证据表明EPS和EFP之间存在强烈的负相关关系。与EPS的影响类似,绿色能源消费对EFP的分布产生不同的负面和正面影响。然而,这里的一个关键观察是绿色能源消费对EFP的主要负贡献。除了最低和最高的分位数外,绿色能源的贡献仍然不足以产生生态可持续性。进一步的研究发现,绿色能源和EPS在时间和分位数维度上都显著地引起了EFP的格兰杰效应。因此,本研究强调决策者应考虑将排放限制、碳定价和减少废物等市场工具结合起来,以优化环境结果并缓解环境压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书