IgE-Sensitized Mast Cells: A Programmable Platform for Antigen-Triggered Oncolytic Virotherapy

Lin Chen, Yu-Xuan Jin, Jin-Lyu Sun
{"title":"IgE-Sensitized Mast Cells: A Programmable Platform for Antigen-Triggered Oncolytic Virotherapy","authors":"Lin Chen,&nbsp;Yu-Xuan Jin,&nbsp;Jin-Lyu Sun","doi":"10.1002/mef2.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a recent study published in <i>Cell</i>, Xu et al. developed a “programmable” delivery system using IgE-sensitized mast cells as antigen-triggerable carriers for oncolytic viruses (OVs). This strategy achieves precise, on-demand viral release within the tumor microenvironment (TME) while simultaneously harnessing intrinsic degranulation and chemotactic capacities to transform mast cells from passive vehicles into potent immune “accelerators” that amplify antitumor immunity [<span>1</span>] (Figure 1).</p><p>Oncolytic viruses have emerged as a promising platform that bridges direct tumor lysis and in situ vaccine effects. However, their clinical translation has been persistently constrained by two major bottlenecks. First, following systemic administration, OVs are readily cleared from circulation, exhibit heterogeneous intratumoral distribution, and are substantially neutralized by pre-existing or treatment-induced antiviral antibodies [<span>2, 3</span>]. Second, even when OVs successfully reach tumors, the immunosuppressive TME often limits dendritic cell (DC) activation and effector T-cell expansion, resulting in an insufficient immune cascade [<span>4, 5</span>]. Against this backdrop, the selection of mast cells as delivery vehicles by Xu et al. [<span>1</span>] is far from incidental. Mast cells express high levels of FcεRI on their surface and rapidly undergo degranulation upon IgE crosslinking, releasing cytokines and chemokines that reshape the local immune niche—an intrinsic mechanism ideally suited for spatiotemporally controlled release and immune recruitment amplification.</p><p>The study first established and characterized IgE-sensitized mast cells (IgE-MCs). Structurally, scanning electron microscopy revealed corresponding changes in cell morphology and surface features following sensitization and activation. Functionally, antigen stimulation induced robust secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, CCL2, and CCL3, and pharmacological inhibitor pretreatment confirmed the controllability of this activation pathway. Furthermore, through live-cell imaging and confocal z-stack analyses, the authors visualized dynamic interactions between IgE-MCs and tumor cells, as well as granule-associated behaviors. In tumor tissues, alterations in the abundance and enrichment of CD117⁺FcεRI⁺ mast cells were observed. Notably, single-cell transcriptomic profiling and clustering of intratumoral CD45⁺ immune cells demonstrated markedly enhanced immune infiltration following IgE-MC treatment, with gene expression patterns consistent with CD8⁺ T-cell migration. Among these, the CCL3 axis was specifically identified through gene-editing and migration assays as a key driver of activated CD8⁺ T-cell chemotaxis and intratumoral accumulation.</p><p>Building upon this foundation, Xu et al. developed the OV@IgE-MC delivery system. Confocal and transmission electron microscopy clearly showed that OVs could be loaded into mast cells and associated with granule structures. Importantly, antigen triggering induced mast-cell degranulation accompanied by enhanced viral release, resulting in an antigen-gated release profile. In vitro infection assays demonstrated that OV@IgE-MCs infected tumor cells more efficiently than free virus or nonsensitized carriers. Even in the presence of OV-neutralizing antibodies, this delivery platform retained a substantial advantage, suggesting a degree of immune shielding and delivery protection. Consistently, pharmacological stabilization of mast cells using agents such as cromolyn suppressed degranulation and reduced intratumoral viral genome copy numbers, mechanistically supporting a degranulation–release–infection causal chain.</p><p>In a subcutaneous B16F10-OVA tumor model, OV@IgE-MCs conferred significantly superior tumor suppression and survival benefits compared with all control groups, including OVs alone, MCs, IgE-MCs, or OV@MCs. At the tissue level, stronger indicators of viral infection (e.g., EGFP signals) and immune remodeling were observed. Flow-cytometric analyses further revealed increased activation and maturation of intratumoral DCs (CD80⁺CD86⁺), an elevated proportion of CD103⁺ DCs, enhanced CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration, and a reduction in immunosuppressive populations such as regulatory T cells. Cytokine profiling of tumor tissues also indicated amplified local immune activation. Integrated with single-cell T-cell transcriptomic data, the authors demonstrated that OV@IgE-MC treatment induced more pronounced transcriptional reprogramming of CD8⁺ T cells than OV monotherapy, enriching pathways associated with effector function, migration, and immune activation. These findings fill a critical gap in the oncolysis–antigen release–DC activation–T-cell effector cascade.</p><p>To assess applicability in metastatic settings, the study employed lung metastasis and pulmonary colonization models, in which OV@IgE-MCs significantly reduced in vivo bioluminescent signals and the number of surface lung metastases. These results were corroborated by H&amp;E staining and quantitative analyses. Peripheral immune monitoring revealed increased proportions of CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, while immunofluorescence of lung lesions showed enhanced infiltration of both CD8⁺ T cells and mast cells. Together, these findings indicate that the strategy exerts not only local antitumor effects but also measurable systemic immune responses.</p><p>Of particular translational relevance, Xu et al. [<span>1</span>] extended their validation to humanized patient-derived xenograft models. Using a humanized immune background and OV@IgE-sensitized human mast cells (OV@IgE-hMCs), the authors observed suppressed tumor growth, reduced endpoint tumor weight, and relatively stable body weight. Tumor tissues exhibited increased infiltration of CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, with significantly elevated IFN-γ⁺ CD8⁺ and GZMB⁺ CD8⁺ effector populations. This advancement moves the concept from murine syngeneic models toward systems that more closely approximate clinical complexity, providing a practical foundation for subsequent development addressing safety, dosing, and manufacturing scalability.</p><p>Overall, this work redefines mast cells as an engineerable “immuno-delivery unit.” IgE sensitization provides a specific triggering switch, degranulation offers a rapid release conduit, chemokine networks function as immune recruitment amplifiers, and OV cargo delivers tumor lysis and in situ vaccination effects. Compared to conventional cell-based platforms—such as macrophages, which primarily leverage tumor-homing patterns, or T cells, which often focus on active targeting—the mast cell-based approach offers a distinct kinetic advantage. By utilizing the explosive nature of the degranulation process, this strategy bypasses the slow, passive release associated with other carriers, providing a “burst-on-demand” mechanism that is uniquely coupled with the host′s allergic signaling machinery. This integrated delivery–release–immune remodeling framework is particularly well suited to overcoming core barriers faced by oncolytic virotherapy, including suboptimal biodistribution, immune clearance, and insufficient immune priming.</p><p>Nonetheless, several critical scientific and engineering challenges must be systematically addressed before clinical translation. First, the safety window and controllability of IgE-mediated triggering across diverse patient immune backgrounds require careful definition, particularly with respect to antigen design, route optimization, and the incorporation of reversible safety-valve mechanisms to minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Crucially, the practical feasibility of clinical implementation remains constrained by the challenges of obtaining and expanding sufficient quantities of autologous mast cells. Unlike more abundant circulating leukocytes, the scarcity of primary mast cells in peripheral blood necessitates highly efficient isolation and robust ex vivo expansion protocols to meet therapeutic dosages, posing a significant hurdle for large-scale application. Second, the pronounced heterogeneity of tumor antigens may affect the consistency and predictability of IgE-mediated activation, suggesting that future iterations may benefit from exogenous controllable antigens, universal trigger modules, or combination with complementary immunomodulatory strategies to enhance robustness across heterogeneous patient populations. Central to this robustness is a deeper understanding of the intricate crosstalk between engineered mast cells and other components of the TME, such as T cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts. Deciphering how these interactions modulate the local immune landscape will be pivotal in ensuring sustained therapeutic efficacy. Third, as an engineered cell-based therapeutic product, issues related to manufacturing workflows, viral loading efficiency, in vivo stability, and batch-to-batch consistency must be standardized and scaled in compliance with regulatory requirements, posing substantial challenges for process development and quality control. Despite these hurdles, this platform holds significant promise for broad clinical application across a variety of solid tumors, potentially serving as a versatile modular system for precision immunotherapy.</p><p>The study establishes a highly distinctive translational strategy: by harnessing programmable immune-cell biology, it reconceptualizes the traditional “delivery problem” as a precisely triggerable and immunologically amplifiable therapeutic process. In this model, delivery itself becomes an integral component of the antitumor immune cascade. This conceptual framework not only provides a new entry point for oncolytic virotherapy but also offers important insights into how drugs, biologics, and multimodal immunotherapies may achieve spatiotemporally precise release and synergistic amplification in vivo.</p><p><b>Lin Chen:</b> investigation, writing original – draft, drawing. <b>Yu-Xuan Jin:</b> writing original draft. <b>Jin-Lyu Sun:</b> conceptualization, project administration, writing – review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>No data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.</p>","PeriodicalId":74135,"journal":{"name":"MedComm - Future medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mef2.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm - Future medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mef2.70053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a recent study published in Cell, Xu et al. developed a “programmable” delivery system using IgE-sensitized mast cells as antigen-triggerable carriers for oncolytic viruses (OVs). This strategy achieves precise, on-demand viral release within the tumor microenvironment (TME) while simultaneously harnessing intrinsic degranulation and chemotactic capacities to transform mast cells from passive vehicles into potent immune “accelerators” that amplify antitumor immunity [1] (Figure 1).

Oncolytic viruses have emerged as a promising platform that bridges direct tumor lysis and in situ vaccine effects. However, their clinical translation has been persistently constrained by two major bottlenecks. First, following systemic administration, OVs are readily cleared from circulation, exhibit heterogeneous intratumoral distribution, and are substantially neutralized by pre-existing or treatment-induced antiviral antibodies [2, 3]. Second, even when OVs successfully reach tumors, the immunosuppressive TME often limits dendritic cell (DC) activation and effector T-cell expansion, resulting in an insufficient immune cascade [4, 5]. Against this backdrop, the selection of mast cells as delivery vehicles by Xu et al. [1] is far from incidental. Mast cells express high levels of FcεRI on their surface and rapidly undergo degranulation upon IgE crosslinking, releasing cytokines and chemokines that reshape the local immune niche—an intrinsic mechanism ideally suited for spatiotemporally controlled release and immune recruitment amplification.

The study first established and characterized IgE-sensitized mast cells (IgE-MCs). Structurally, scanning electron microscopy revealed corresponding changes in cell morphology and surface features following sensitization and activation. Functionally, antigen stimulation induced robust secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, CCL2, and CCL3, and pharmacological inhibitor pretreatment confirmed the controllability of this activation pathway. Furthermore, through live-cell imaging and confocal z-stack analyses, the authors visualized dynamic interactions between IgE-MCs and tumor cells, as well as granule-associated behaviors. In tumor tissues, alterations in the abundance and enrichment of CD117⁺FcεRI⁺ mast cells were observed. Notably, single-cell transcriptomic profiling and clustering of intratumoral CD45⁺ immune cells demonstrated markedly enhanced immune infiltration following IgE-MC treatment, with gene expression patterns consistent with CD8⁺ T-cell migration. Among these, the CCL3 axis was specifically identified through gene-editing and migration assays as a key driver of activated CD8⁺ T-cell chemotaxis and intratumoral accumulation.

Building upon this foundation, Xu et al. developed the OV@IgE-MC delivery system. Confocal and transmission electron microscopy clearly showed that OVs could be loaded into mast cells and associated with granule structures. Importantly, antigen triggering induced mast-cell degranulation accompanied by enhanced viral release, resulting in an antigen-gated release profile. In vitro infection assays demonstrated that OV@IgE-MCs infected tumor cells more efficiently than free virus or nonsensitized carriers. Even in the presence of OV-neutralizing antibodies, this delivery platform retained a substantial advantage, suggesting a degree of immune shielding and delivery protection. Consistently, pharmacological stabilization of mast cells using agents such as cromolyn suppressed degranulation and reduced intratumoral viral genome copy numbers, mechanistically supporting a degranulation–release–infection causal chain.

In a subcutaneous B16F10-OVA tumor model, OV@IgE-MCs conferred significantly superior tumor suppression and survival benefits compared with all control groups, including OVs alone, MCs, IgE-MCs, or OV@MCs. At the tissue level, stronger indicators of viral infection (e.g., EGFP signals) and immune remodeling were observed. Flow-cytometric analyses further revealed increased activation and maturation of intratumoral DCs (CD80⁺CD86⁺), an elevated proportion of CD103⁺ DCs, enhanced CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration, and a reduction in immunosuppressive populations such as regulatory T cells. Cytokine profiling of tumor tissues also indicated amplified local immune activation. Integrated with single-cell T-cell transcriptomic data, the authors demonstrated that OV@IgE-MC treatment induced more pronounced transcriptional reprogramming of CD8⁺ T cells than OV monotherapy, enriching pathways associated with effector function, migration, and immune activation. These findings fill a critical gap in the oncolysis–antigen release–DC activation–T-cell effector cascade.

To assess applicability in metastatic settings, the study employed lung metastasis and pulmonary colonization models, in which OV@IgE-MCs significantly reduced in vivo bioluminescent signals and the number of surface lung metastases. These results were corroborated by H&E staining and quantitative analyses. Peripheral immune monitoring revealed increased proportions of CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, while immunofluorescence of lung lesions showed enhanced infiltration of both CD8⁺ T cells and mast cells. Together, these findings indicate that the strategy exerts not only local antitumor effects but also measurable systemic immune responses.

Of particular translational relevance, Xu et al. [1] extended their validation to humanized patient-derived xenograft models. Using a humanized immune background and OV@IgE-sensitized human mast cells (OV@IgE-hMCs), the authors observed suppressed tumor growth, reduced endpoint tumor weight, and relatively stable body weight. Tumor tissues exhibited increased infiltration of CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, with significantly elevated IFN-γ⁺ CD8⁺ and GZMB⁺ CD8⁺ effector populations. This advancement moves the concept from murine syngeneic models toward systems that more closely approximate clinical complexity, providing a practical foundation for subsequent development addressing safety, dosing, and manufacturing scalability.

Overall, this work redefines mast cells as an engineerable “immuno-delivery unit.” IgE sensitization provides a specific triggering switch, degranulation offers a rapid release conduit, chemokine networks function as immune recruitment amplifiers, and OV cargo delivers tumor lysis and in situ vaccination effects. Compared to conventional cell-based platforms—such as macrophages, which primarily leverage tumor-homing patterns, or T cells, which often focus on active targeting—the mast cell-based approach offers a distinct kinetic advantage. By utilizing the explosive nature of the degranulation process, this strategy bypasses the slow, passive release associated with other carriers, providing a “burst-on-demand” mechanism that is uniquely coupled with the host′s allergic signaling machinery. This integrated delivery–release–immune remodeling framework is particularly well suited to overcoming core barriers faced by oncolytic virotherapy, including suboptimal biodistribution, immune clearance, and insufficient immune priming.

Nonetheless, several critical scientific and engineering challenges must be systematically addressed before clinical translation. First, the safety window and controllability of IgE-mediated triggering across diverse patient immune backgrounds require careful definition, particularly with respect to antigen design, route optimization, and the incorporation of reversible safety-valve mechanisms to minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Crucially, the practical feasibility of clinical implementation remains constrained by the challenges of obtaining and expanding sufficient quantities of autologous mast cells. Unlike more abundant circulating leukocytes, the scarcity of primary mast cells in peripheral blood necessitates highly efficient isolation and robust ex vivo expansion protocols to meet therapeutic dosages, posing a significant hurdle for large-scale application. Second, the pronounced heterogeneity of tumor antigens may affect the consistency and predictability of IgE-mediated activation, suggesting that future iterations may benefit from exogenous controllable antigens, universal trigger modules, or combination with complementary immunomodulatory strategies to enhance robustness across heterogeneous patient populations. Central to this robustness is a deeper understanding of the intricate crosstalk between engineered mast cells and other components of the TME, such as T cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts. Deciphering how these interactions modulate the local immune landscape will be pivotal in ensuring sustained therapeutic efficacy. Third, as an engineered cell-based therapeutic product, issues related to manufacturing workflows, viral loading efficiency, in vivo stability, and batch-to-batch consistency must be standardized and scaled in compliance with regulatory requirements, posing substantial challenges for process development and quality control. Despite these hurdles, this platform holds significant promise for broad clinical application across a variety of solid tumors, potentially serving as a versatile modular system for precision immunotherapy.

The study establishes a highly distinctive translational strategy: by harnessing programmable immune-cell biology, it reconceptualizes the traditional “delivery problem” as a precisely triggerable and immunologically amplifiable therapeutic process. In this model, delivery itself becomes an integral component of the antitumor immune cascade. This conceptual framework not only provides a new entry point for oncolytic virotherapy but also offers important insights into how drugs, biologics, and multimodal immunotherapies may achieve spatiotemporally precise release and synergistic amplification in vivo.

Lin Chen: investigation, writing original – draft, drawing. Yu-Xuan Jin: writing original draft. Jin-Lyu Sun: conceptualization, project administration, writing – review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors have nothing to report.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

No data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

ige致敏肥大细胞:抗原触发溶瘤病毒治疗的可编程平台
在最近发表在Cell杂志上的一项研究中,Xu等人开发了一种“可编程”的递送系统,使用ige敏化的肥大细胞作为溶瘤病毒(OVs)的抗原触发载体。这种策略在肿瘤微环境(TME)内实现了精确的、按需的病毒释放,同时利用固有的脱颗粒和趋化能力,将肥大细胞从被动载体转化为有效的免疫“加速器”,增强抗肿瘤免疫(图1)。溶瘤病毒已成为一个有前途的平台,桥梁直接肿瘤裂解和原位疫苗效应。然而,它们的临床转化一直受到两大瓶颈的制约。首先,在全身给药后,OVs很容易从循环中清除,表现出异质的肿瘤内分布,并被预先存在的或治疗诱导的抗病毒抗体基本上中和[2,3]。其次,即使OVs成功到达肿瘤,免疫抑制TME也经常限制树突状细胞(DC)的激活和效应t细胞的扩增,导致免疫级联不足[4,5]。在此背景下,Xu等人选择肥大细胞作为递送载体绝非偶然。肥大细胞在其表面表达高水平的FcεRI,并在IgE交联后迅速进行脱粒,释放重塑局部免疫生态位的细胞因子和趋化因子,这是一种非常适合时空控制释放和免疫募集放大的内在机制。该研究首次建立并表征了ige致敏肥大细胞(IgE-MCs)。在结构上,扫描电镜显示了敏化和激活后细胞形态和表面特征的相应变化。在功能上,抗原刺激诱导了TNF-α、IL-6、CCL2和CCL3的强劲分泌,药物抑制剂预处理证实了这一激活途径的可控性。此外,通过活细胞成像和共聚焦z叠分析,作者可视化了IgE-MCs与肿瘤细胞之间的动态相互作用,以及颗粒相关行为。在肿瘤组织中,CD117 + fcε + ri +肥大细胞的丰度和富集度发生了变化。值得注意的是,肿瘤内CD45 +免疫细胞的单细胞转录组分析和聚类显示,经过IgE-MC处理后,CD45 +免疫细胞的免疫浸润明显增强,其基因表达模式与CD8 + t细胞迁移一致。其中,CCL3轴通过基因编辑和迁移实验被特异性鉴定为激活CD8 + t细胞趋化性和肿瘤内积累的关键驱动因素。在此基础上,Xu等人开发了OV@IgE-MC传递系统。共聚焦电镜和透射电镜清楚地显示,OVs可以装载到肥大细胞中,并与颗粒结构相关。重要的是,抗原触发诱导肥大细胞脱颗粒伴随着增强的病毒释放,导致抗原门控释放谱。体外感染试验表明OV@IgE-MCs感染肿瘤细胞的效率高于游离病毒或非致敏载体。即使在ov中和抗体存在的情况下,这种递送平台也保持了很大的优势,表明一定程度的免疫屏蔽和递送保护。一贯地,肥大细胞的药理稳定使用药物如色莫利抑制脱颗粒和减少肿瘤内病毒基因组拷贝数,机械地支持脱颗粒-释放-感染因果链。在皮下B16F10-OVA肿瘤模型中,与所有对照组(包括单独的OVs、MCs、IgE-MCs或OV@MCs)相比,OV@IgE-MCs具有明显更好的肿瘤抑制和生存益处。在组织水平上,观察到更强的病毒感染指标(如EGFP信号)和免疫重塑。流式细胞术分析进一步显示,肿瘤内dc (CD80 + CD86 +)的激活和成熟增加,CD103 + dc的比例升高,CD8 + T细胞浸润增强,免疫抑制群体(如调节性T细胞)减少。肿瘤组织的细胞因子谱也表明局部免疫激活放大。结合单细胞T细胞转录组学数据,作者证明OV@IgE-MC治疗比OV单药治疗诱导CD8 + T细胞更明显的转录重编程,丰富了与效应功能、迁移和免疫激活相关的途径。这些发现填补了溶瘤-抗原释放- dc激活- t细胞效应级联的关键空白。为了评估在转移环境中的适用性,该研究采用了肺转移和肺定植模型,其中OV@IgE-MCs显著降低了体内生物发光信号和表面肺转移的数量。H&amp;E染色和定量分析证实了这些结果。 外周免疫监测显示CD3 +和CD8 + T细胞比例增加,肺病变免疫荧光显示CD8 + T细胞和肥大细胞浸润增强。总之,这些发现表明该策略不仅具有局部抗肿瘤作用,而且具有可测量的全身免疫反应。特别与翻译相关的是,Xu等人将他们的验证扩展到人源化患者来源的异种移植模型。使用人源化免疫背景和OV@IgE-sensitized人肥大细胞(OV@IgE-hMCs),作者观察到肿瘤生长受到抑制,终点肿瘤重量减少,体重相对稳定。肿瘤组织中CD3 +和CD8 + T细胞的浸润增加,IFN-γ + CD8 +和GZMB + CD8 +效应细胞显著增加。这一进展将概念从小鼠同质模型转向更接近临床复杂性的系统,为后续开发解决安全性,剂量和制造可扩展性提供了实践基础。总的来说,这项工作将肥大细胞重新定义为可工程的“免疫传递单元”。IgE致敏提供了一个特定的触发开关,脱颗粒提供了一个快速释放通道,趋化因子网络作为免疫募集放大器,OV货物提供肿瘤溶解和原位疫苗接种效果。与传统的基于细胞的平台相比,如主要利用肿瘤归巢模式的巨噬细胞,或经常专注于主动靶向的T细胞,基于肥大细胞的方法提供了明显的动力学优势。通过利用脱粒过程的爆炸性,该策略绕过了与其他载体相关的缓慢、被动释放,提供了一种与宿主过敏信号机制独特耦合的“按需爆发”机制。这种整合的递送-释放-免疫重塑框架特别适合克服溶瘤病毒治疗面临的核心障碍,包括次优生物分布、免疫清除和免疫启动不足。尽管如此,在临床翻译之前,必须系统地解决几个关键的科学和工程挑战。首先,不同患者免疫背景的ige介导触发的安全窗口和可控性需要仔细定义,特别是在抗原设计、路径优化和可逆安全阀机制的结合方面,以尽量减少超敏反应的风险。至关重要的是,临床实施的实际可行性仍然受到获得和扩增足够数量的自体肥大细胞的挑战的限制。与更丰富的循环白细胞不同,外周血中原代肥大细胞的稀缺性需要高效的分离和强大的体外扩增方案来满足治疗剂量,这对大规模应用构成了重大障碍。其次,肿瘤抗原的明显异质性可能会影响ige介导激活的一致性和可预测性,这表明未来的迭代可能受益于外源性可控抗原、通用触发模块或与互补免疫调节策略的结合,以增强异质患者群体的稳健性。这种稳健性的核心是对工程肥大细胞和TME的其他组成部分(如T细胞、巨噬细胞和成纤维细胞)之间复杂的串扰有更深入的了解。破译这些相互作用如何调节局部免疫景观将是确保持续治疗效果的关键。第三,作为一种基于工程细胞的治疗产品,与生产流程、病毒装载效率、体内稳定性和批次间一致性相关的问题必须标准化和规模化,以符合法规要求,这对工艺开发和质量控制构成了重大挑战。尽管存在这些障碍,但该平台在各种实体肿瘤的广泛临床应用中具有重要的前景,有可能作为精确免疫治疗的多功能模块化系统。该研究建立了一个高度独特的转化策略:通过利用可编程免疫细胞生物学,它将传统的“传递问题”重新定义为一个精确触发和免疫放大的治疗过程。在这个模型中,递送本身成为抗肿瘤免疫级联的一个组成部分。这一概念框架不仅为溶瘤病毒治疗提供了一个新的切入点,而且为药物、生物制剂和多模态免疫疗法如何在体内实现时空精确释放和协同放大提供了重要见解。林晨:调查、撰写原稿、绘图。金宇轩:撰写原稿。孙金吕:构思、项目管理、写作评审、编辑。 所有作者都阅读并批准了最终稿件。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。在本研究中没有生成或分析任何数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书