Understanding COPD Patients' Perspectives on Utilizing Strategies to Limit Their Exposure to Wildfire Smoke.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jimmy Yao, Caitlin M Lydon, Nina Pak, Kathleen A Daly, Mary Meyer, Nadia Hansel, Mark T Dransfield, Stacey Alexeeff, Andrea Altshuler, Laura C Myers
{"title":"Understanding COPD Patients' Perspectives on Utilizing Strategies to Limit Their Exposure to Wildfire Smoke.","authors":"Jimmy Yao, Caitlin M Lydon, Nina Pak, Kathleen A Daly, Mary Meyer, Nadia Hansel, Mark T Dransfield, Stacey Alexeeff, Andrea Altshuler, Laura C Myers","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2025.0682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A translation gap exists in how patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) utilize mitigation strategies to limit exposure to wildfire smoke. This study examines patients' point of view about barriers and facilitators of strategy uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed semi-structured, virtual interviews with members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California until thematic saturation. We recruited participants aged ≥65 in the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status because they are disproportionately exposed to air pollution with fewer resources to mitigate exposure. Qualitative analysis was performed using inductive and deductive approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 90,696 adults, we interviewed 31 in January 2025. Participants were racially and ethnically diverse (19% Black, 10% Hispanic, 3% Native American, 68% non-Hispanic White), from 10 counties. Three major themes were 1) patients tended to get wildfire and air quality information from internet and smartphone apps, not clinical encounters, but expressed openness to receiving information from clinicians, 2) there appear to be modifiable barriers to uptake of mitigation strategies, such as education and supplying equipment (e.g., masks, air cleaners), and 3) patients prefer real-time alerts sent to their phones from trusted sources, such as healthcare entities, to change their behavior during periods of poor air quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By understanding patients' perspectives about their relationship with wildfire smoke, we've gained practical information to begin designing interventions to protect patients' health during periods of poor air quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2025.0682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A translation gap exists in how patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) utilize mitigation strategies to limit exposure to wildfire smoke. This study examines patients' point of view about barriers and facilitators of strategy uptake.

Methods: We performed semi-structured, virtual interviews with members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California until thematic saturation. We recruited participants aged ≥65 in the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status because they are disproportionately exposed to air pollution with fewer resources to mitigate exposure. Qualitative analysis was performed using inductive and deductive approaches.

Results: Of 90,696 adults, we interviewed 31 in January 2025. Participants were racially and ethnically diverse (19% Black, 10% Hispanic, 3% Native American, 68% non-Hispanic White), from 10 counties. Three major themes were 1) patients tended to get wildfire and air quality information from internet and smartphone apps, not clinical encounters, but expressed openness to receiving information from clinicians, 2) there appear to be modifiable barriers to uptake of mitigation strategies, such as education and supplying equipment (e.g., masks, air cleaners), and 3) patients prefer real-time alerts sent to their phones from trusted sources, such as healthcare entities, to change their behavior during periods of poor air quality.

Conclusion: By understanding patients' perspectives about their relationship with wildfire smoke, we've gained practical information to begin designing interventions to protect patients' health during periods of poor air quality.

了解COPD患者对限制野火烟雾暴露策略的看法。
背景:在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者如何利用缓解策略限制野火烟雾暴露方面存在翻译差距。本研究考察了患者对策略吸收障碍和促进因素的看法。方法:我们对北加州凯撒医疗机构的成员进行了半结构化的虚拟访谈,直到主题饱和。我们招募了年龄≥65岁的社会经济地位最低四分位数的参与者,因为他们不成比例地暴露于空气污染中,而减少暴露的资源较少。定性分析采用归纳和演绎的方法进行。结果:在90,696名成年人中,我们于2025年1月采访了31名。参与者来自10个县,种族和民族多样化(19%的黑人,10%的西班牙裔,3%的美洲原住民,68%的非西班牙裔白人)。三个主要主题是:1)患者倾向于从互联网和智能手机应用程序获取野火和空气质量信息,而不是从临床就诊,但表示愿意接受临床医生的信息;2)在采用缓解策略方面似乎存在可修改的障碍,例如教育和提供设备(例如口罩、空气净化器);3)患者更喜欢从可信来源(例如医疗保健实体)向其手机发送实时警报。在空气质量差的时候改变它们的行为。结论:通过了解患者对他们与野火烟雾的关系的看法,我们已经获得了实用的信息,可以开始设计干预措施,在空气质量差的时期保护患者的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书