Jimmy Yao, Caitlin M Lydon, Nina Pak, Kathleen A Daly, Mary Meyer, Nadia Hansel, Mark T Dransfield, Stacey Alexeeff, Andrea Altshuler, Laura C Myers
{"title":"Understanding COPD Patients' Perspectives on Utilizing Strategies to Limit Their Exposure to Wildfire Smoke.","authors":"Jimmy Yao, Caitlin M Lydon, Nina Pak, Kathleen A Daly, Mary Meyer, Nadia Hansel, Mark T Dransfield, Stacey Alexeeff, Andrea Altshuler, Laura C Myers","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2025.0682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A translation gap exists in how patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) utilize mitigation strategies to limit exposure to wildfire smoke. This study examines patients' point of view about barriers and facilitators of strategy uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed semi-structured, virtual interviews with members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California until thematic saturation. We recruited participants aged ≥65 in the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status because they are disproportionately exposed to air pollution with fewer resources to mitigate exposure. Qualitative analysis was performed using inductive and deductive approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 90,696 adults, we interviewed 31 in January 2025. Participants were racially and ethnically diverse (19% Black, 10% Hispanic, 3% Native American, 68% non-Hispanic White), from 10 counties. Three major themes were 1) patients tended to get wildfire and air quality information from internet and smartphone apps, not clinical encounters, but expressed openness to receiving information from clinicians, 2) there appear to be modifiable barriers to uptake of mitigation strategies, such as education and supplying equipment (e.g., masks, air cleaners), and 3) patients prefer real-time alerts sent to their phones from trusted sources, such as healthcare entities, to change their behavior during periods of poor air quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By understanding patients' perspectives about their relationship with wildfire smoke, we've gained practical information to begin designing interventions to protect patients' health during periods of poor air quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2025.0682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A translation gap exists in how patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) utilize mitigation strategies to limit exposure to wildfire smoke. This study examines patients' point of view about barriers and facilitators of strategy uptake.
Methods: We performed semi-structured, virtual interviews with members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California until thematic saturation. We recruited participants aged ≥65 in the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status because they are disproportionately exposed to air pollution with fewer resources to mitigate exposure. Qualitative analysis was performed using inductive and deductive approaches.
Results: Of 90,696 adults, we interviewed 31 in January 2025. Participants were racially and ethnically diverse (19% Black, 10% Hispanic, 3% Native American, 68% non-Hispanic White), from 10 counties. Three major themes were 1) patients tended to get wildfire and air quality information from internet and smartphone apps, not clinical encounters, but expressed openness to receiving information from clinicians, 2) there appear to be modifiable barriers to uptake of mitigation strategies, such as education and supplying equipment (e.g., masks, air cleaners), and 3) patients prefer real-time alerts sent to their phones from trusted sources, such as healthcare entities, to change their behavior during periods of poor air quality.
Conclusion: By understanding patients' perspectives about their relationship with wildfire smoke, we've gained practical information to begin designing interventions to protect patients' health during periods of poor air quality.