Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in a Nonhospital Surgical Facility: Retrospective Chart Review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Carmen E Paterson, Matthew Fay, George Forrest, Kevin Lung, Clayton Davis
{"title":"Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in a Nonhospital Surgical Facility: Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Carmen E Paterson, Matthew Fay, George Forrest, Kevin Lung, Clayton Davis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with mandibular fracture need treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). These patients are typically treated in hospital, as either inpatients or day surgery patients. However, it is possible to perform these surgeries in a nonhospital surgical facility (NHSF). In this study, we review the outcomes of ORIF surgery for mandibular fracture performed in an NHSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart analysis was conducted for all patients with mandibular fracture who were referred, between 2019 and 2024, to an NHSF in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, for ORIF. Data were collected for patient- and injury-related variables, including cause of trauma; fracture location; time from injury and diagnosis to ORIF; time in the operating room and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU); complication rates for nausea, vomiting, pain or bleeding in the PACU; rates of same-day discharge, hardware failure, non-union and infection; and length of postoperative follow-up. A cost analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 patients with mandibular fracture who underwent ORIF as day surgery in an NHSF met the inclusion criteria. The mean times from injury to ORIF and from fracture diagnosis to ORIF were 6.0 and 2.5 days, respectively. The mean times spent in the operating and recovery rooms were 61.6 and 62.2 minutes, respectively. All of the patients were discharged home, and no patients experienced surgical or anesthesia complications requiring transfer to a hospital. The cost analysis showed that performance of ORIF was more cost-effective in an NHSF than in hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary data are the first in Canada suggesting that for selected cases of mandibular fracture, ORIF in an NHSF is efficient, safe and cost-effective, provided stringent patient selection criteria and postoperative protocols for discharge are followed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Dental Association","volume":"91 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many patients with mandibular fracture need treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). These patients are typically treated in hospital, as either inpatients or day surgery patients. However, it is possible to perform these surgeries in a nonhospital surgical facility (NHSF). In this study, we review the outcomes of ORIF surgery for mandibular fracture performed in an NHSF.

Methods: A retrospective chart analysis was conducted for all patients with mandibular fracture who were referred, between 2019 and 2024, to an NHSF in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, for ORIF. Data were collected for patient- and injury-related variables, including cause of trauma; fracture location; time from injury and diagnosis to ORIF; time in the operating room and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU); complication rates for nausea, vomiting, pain or bleeding in the PACU; rates of same-day discharge, hardware failure, non-union and infection; and length of postoperative follow-up. A cost analysis was also conducted.

Results: A total of 69 patients with mandibular fracture who underwent ORIF as day surgery in an NHSF met the inclusion criteria. The mean times from injury to ORIF and from fracture diagnosis to ORIF were 6.0 and 2.5 days, respectively. The mean times spent in the operating and recovery rooms were 61.6 and 62.2 minutes, respectively. All of the patients were discharged home, and no patients experienced surgical or anesthesia complications requiring transfer to a hospital. The cost analysis showed that performance of ORIF was more cost-effective in an NHSF than in hospital.

Conclusion: These preliminary data are the first in Canada suggesting that for selected cases of mandibular fracture, ORIF in an NHSF is efficient, safe and cost-effective, provided stringent patient selection criteria and postoperative protocols for discharge are followed.

非医院外科机构下颌骨骨折切开复位内固定:回顾性图表回顾。
背景:许多下颌骨折患者需要切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗。这些病人通常在医院接受治疗,要么是住院病人,要么是日间手术病人。然而,可以在非医院外科设施(NHSF)中进行这些手术。在这项研究中,我们回顾了在NHSF中进行下颌骨折ORIF手术的结果。方法:对2019年至2024年间转介至加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿的NHSF接受ORIF治疗的所有下颌骨折患者进行回顾性图表分析。收集患者和损伤相关变量的数据,包括创伤原因;断裂位置;从损伤和诊断到ORIF的时间;在手术室和麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的时间;PACU内恶心、呕吐、疼痛或出血的并发症发生率;当日出院率、硬体故障率、不愈合率和感染率;以及术后随访时间。还进行了成本分析。结果:共有69例下颌骨骨折患者在NHSF接受ORIF作为日间手术,符合纳入标准。损伤至ORIF的平均时间为6.0天,骨折诊断至ORIF的平均时间为2.5天。手术室和恢复室的平均时间分别为61.6分钟和62.2分钟。所有患者出院回家,没有患者出现手术或麻醉并发症,需要转移到医院。成本分析表明,在全国社保基金中实施ORIF比在医院中更具成本效益。结论:这些初步数据在加拿大首次表明,在严格的患者选择标准和术后出院方案下,对于选定的下颌骨折病例,在NHSF中进行ORIF是高效、安全和经济的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Canadian Dental Association
Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCDA.ca (Journal of the Canadian Dental Association) is the flagship scholarly, peer-reviewed publication of CDA, providing dialogue between the national association and the dental community. It is dedicated to publishing worthy scientific and clinical articles and informing dentists of issues significant to the profession. CDA has focused its recent efforts on knowledge, advocacy and practice support initiatives and JCDA.ca is an essential part of CDA''s knowledge strategy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书