Knowledge, perception and application of pharmacoeconomics among healthcare professionals in Malaysia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Haarathi Chandriah, Ee Vien Low, Nur Sufiza Ahmad, Azmi Nor Mohd Farez Ahmat, Izzati Mohd Farok, Jacqueline Hui Yi Wong, Weng Hong Fun, Subramaniam Thanimalai, Chin Hui Ng, Nor Haizan Ibrahim, Mohd Rozaini Rosli, Kenneth Lik Chien Lim, Yai Wen Choo
{"title":"Knowledge, perception and application of pharmacoeconomics among healthcare professionals in Malaysia.","authors":"Haarathi Chandriah, Ee Vien Low, Nur Sufiza Ahmad, Azmi Nor Mohd Farez Ahmat, Izzati Mohd Farok, Jacqueline Hui Yi Wong, Weng Hong Fun, Subramaniam Thanimalai, Chin Hui Ng, Nor Haizan Ibrahim, Mohd Rozaini Rosli, Kenneth Lik Chien Lim, Yai Wen Choo","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2651882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacoeconomics (PE) is essential in optimizing healthcare resource allocation and ensuring cost-effective treatment decisions. Despite its recognized importance, limited evidence exists regarding healthcare professionals' understanding and application of PE in Malaysia. This study assessed the knowledge, perception, and application of PE among healthcare professionals within the Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among MOH healthcare professionals. The survey captured demographic characteristics, familiarity with PE, self-reported knowledge, perception of its importance, and its application in clinical and formulary decision-making. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 754 respondents completed the survey, comprising pharmacists (71.5%), doctors (24.3%) and other healthcare professionals (4.2%). While 63.7% reported familiarity with PE, substantial knowledge gaps were observed, particularly in cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses. PE application was most prevalent in budget impact assessments for formulary decisions. Notably, 94.8% of Drug and Therapeutics Committee members recognized the importance of PE in decision-making, and 96.9% supported the need for dedicated personnel with PE competency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PE knowledge and application varied across MOH healthcare professionals, underscoring the need for targeted training and capacity building to strengthen PE competency, ultimately supporting evidence-informed, cost-effective healthcare decision-making in Malaysia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2651882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacoeconomics (PE) is essential in optimizing healthcare resource allocation and ensuring cost-effective treatment decisions. Despite its recognized importance, limited evidence exists regarding healthcare professionals' understanding and application of PE in Malaysia. This study assessed the knowledge, perception, and application of PE among healthcare professionals within the Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among MOH healthcare professionals. The survey captured demographic characteristics, familiarity with PE, self-reported knowledge, perception of its importance, and its application in clinical and formulary decision-making. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings.

Results: A total of 754 respondents completed the survey, comprising pharmacists (71.5%), doctors (24.3%) and other healthcare professionals (4.2%). While 63.7% reported familiarity with PE, substantial knowledge gaps were observed, particularly in cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses. PE application was most prevalent in budget impact assessments for formulary decisions. Notably, 94.8% of Drug and Therapeutics Committee members recognized the importance of PE in decision-making, and 96.9% supported the need for dedicated personnel with PE competency.

Conclusion: PE knowledge and application varied across MOH healthcare professionals, underscoring the need for targeted training and capacity building to strengthen PE competency, ultimately supporting evidence-informed, cost-effective healthcare decision-making in Malaysia.

马来西亚医疗保健专业人员对药物经济学的知识、认知和应用。
背景:药物经济学(PE)在优化医疗资源分配和确保具有成本效益的治疗决策方面至关重要。尽管其公认的重要性,有限的证据存在关于医疗保健专业人员的理解和应用体育在马来西亚。本研究评估了匿名医疗保健专业人员的PE知识、感知和应用。方法:对卫生部卫生保健专业人员进行横断面在线调查。该调查捕获了人口统计学特征、对体育的熟悉程度、自我报告的知识、对体育重要性的认识以及在临床和处方决策中的应用。描述性统计用于总结研究结果。结果:共有754名受访人员完成调查,其中药师(71.5%)、医生(24.3%)和其他卫生专业人员(4.2%)。尽管63.7%的受访者表示熟悉PE,但仍存在巨大的知识差距,特别是在成本效用和成本效益分析方面。在编制决定的预算影响评估中,PE应用最为普遍。值得注意的是,94.8%的药物和治疗委员会成员认识到体育在决策中的重要性,96.9%的人支持需要具有体育能力的专门人员。结论:卫生部卫生保健专业人员的体育知识和应用各不相同,强调需要有针对性的培训和能力建设,以加强体育能力,最终支持马来西亚循证、具有成本效益的卫生保健决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书