Impact of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation Position on Subclinical Right Ventricular Perforation.

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-29 DOI:10.1111/pace.70218
Young Shin Lee, Jae-Sun Uhm, Je-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park, Ye Chan Kim, In-Soo Kim, Hye-Jeong Lee, Moon-Hyun Kim, Hanjin Park, Daehoon Kim, Hee Tae Yu, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jin-Bae Kim, Jong-Youn Kim, Boyoung Joung, Hui-Nam Pak, Moon-Hyoung Lee
{"title":"Impact of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation Position on Subclinical Right Ventricular Perforation.","authors":"Young Shin Lee, Jae-Sun Uhm, Je-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park, Ye Chan Kim, In-Soo Kim, Hye-Jeong Lee, Moon-Hyun Kim, Hanjin Park, Daehoon Kim, Hee Tae Yu, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jin-Bae Kim, Jong-Youn Kim, Boyoung Joung, Hui-Nam Pak, Moon-Hyoung Lee","doi":"10.1111/pace.70218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Leadless pacemakers are typically implanted in the mid-septum of the right ventricle (RV) to mitigate the risk of perforation. However, reports on the precise location of these implants are limited. This study aimed to elucidate tine-based leadless pacemaker position and presence of subclinical RV perforation through computed tomography (CT) imaging, along with the associated prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent heart, chest or abdomen CT after leadless pacemaker implantation were consecutively included. Two cardiologists and one radiologist reviewed the CT images to assess the position of tines and to detect RV perforation. The implantation position was categorized as the septum, RV free wall, junction of septum and RV free wall, moderator band, and RV apex. Subclinical perforation was defined as the tines of a leadless pacemaker beyond the outer myocardial contour without symptoms, pericardial effusion, hemodynamic instability, or pacemaker malfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 patients (age, 72.9 ± 12.1 years; 42 males) were included. The interval between procedure and CT scanning was 8.6 ± 9.2 months. In 68 patients (77.3%), the leadless pacemaker was implanted at the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. Subclinical RV perforation occurred in 15 patients (17.0%). Among patients with RV perforation, the most common implantation site was the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. None of the patients with RV perforation experienced any adverse events for 12.4 ± 12.3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most common leadless pacemaker implantation site is the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. Subclinical RV perforation is not uncommon and not associated with overt adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1447-1454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Leadless pacemakers are typically implanted in the mid-septum of the right ventricle (RV) to mitigate the risk of perforation. However, reports on the precise location of these implants are limited. This study aimed to elucidate tine-based leadless pacemaker position and presence of subclinical RV perforation through computed tomography (CT) imaging, along with the associated prognosis.

Methods: Patients who underwent heart, chest or abdomen CT after leadless pacemaker implantation were consecutively included. Two cardiologists and one radiologist reviewed the CT images to assess the position of tines and to detect RV perforation. The implantation position was categorized as the septum, RV free wall, junction of septum and RV free wall, moderator band, and RV apex. Subclinical perforation was defined as the tines of a leadless pacemaker beyond the outer myocardial contour without symptoms, pericardial effusion, hemodynamic instability, or pacemaker malfunction.

Results: A total of 88 patients (age, 72.9 ± 12.1 years; 42 males) were included. The interval between procedure and CT scanning was 8.6 ± 9.2 months. In 68 patients (77.3%), the leadless pacemaker was implanted at the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. Subclinical RV perforation occurred in 15 patients (17.0%). Among patients with RV perforation, the most common implantation site was the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. None of the patients with RV perforation experienced any adverse events for 12.4 ± 12.3 months.

Conclusions: The most common leadless pacemaker implantation site is the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. Subclinical RV perforation is not uncommon and not associated with overt adverse outcomes.

无铅起搏器植入位置对亚临床右心室穿孔的影响。
导读:无铅起搏器通常被植入右心室(RV)的中隔,以减轻穿孔的风险。然而,关于这些植入物的精确位置的报道是有限的。本研究旨在通过计算机断层扫描(CT)成像阐明基于时间的无铅起搏器位置和亚临床RV穿孔的存在,以及相关的预后。方法:对无铅起搏器植入术后行心脏、胸部、腹部CT检查的患者进行回顾性分析。两名心脏病专家和一名放射科医生检查了CT图像,以评估时间的位置并检测右心室穿孔。植入位置分为中隔、右心室游离壁、中隔与右心室游离壁交界处、调节带、右心室尖。亚临床穿孔定义为无引线起搏器超出心肌外轮廓的时间,无症状、心包积液、血流动力学不稳定或起搏器功能障碍。结果:共纳入88例患者,年龄72.9±12.1岁,男性42例。手术至CT扫描间隔8.6±9.2个月。68例(77.3%)患者将无铅起搏器植入室间隔与右心室游离壁交界处。亚临床右心室穿孔15例(17.0%)。在右心室穿孔的患者中,最常见的植入部位是中隔和右心室游离壁的交界处。右心室穿孔患者在12.4±12.3个月内无不良事件发生。结论:无铅起搏器最常见的植入部位是室间隔与右心室游离壁交界处。亚临床右心室穿孔并不罕见,与明显的不良后果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书