Supervision Preparedness Among GP Registrars in the UK: A Survey Study.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2026-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.21170.2
Ioannis Saxionis, Bhargav Raut, Pritti Aggarwal, H P Patel
{"title":"Supervision Preparedness Among GP Registrars in the UK: A Survey Study.","authors":"Ioannis Saxionis, Bhargav Raut, Pritti Aggarwal, H P Patel","doi":"10.12688/mep.21170.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical supervision (CS) plays a vital role in healthcare education and patient safety. As general practice embraces a multidisciplinary workforce, GP registrars are increasingly expected to supervise Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) and medical students from day one after qualifying. However, the extent of their preparedness for such roles remains unclear. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey between August 2024 and January 2025 among UK GP registrars. The survey included quantitative and qualitative items assessing supervision experience, confidence, and perceptions of training. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 registrars responded. The majority (n = 50 [96%]) reported no formal training on how to effectively supervise. Only 15% were supervising medical students, and n = 2 (4%) were supervising AHPs. Key barriers to effective supervision included lack of training, time constraints, and uncertainty about roles. Registrars expressed strong interest in structured training to build confidence in supervision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GP registrars report limited training and confidence in clinical supervision, despite growing expectations to supervise a diverse primary care team. Structured educational interventions as part of continuing professional development are needed to support supervision readiness and ensure safe, effective practice in a multidisciplinary environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"15 ","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13019035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.21170.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical supervision (CS) plays a vital role in healthcare education and patient safety. As general practice embraces a multidisciplinary workforce, GP registrars are increasingly expected to supervise Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) and medical students from day one after qualifying. However, the extent of their preparedness for such roles remains unclear. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey between August 2024 and January 2025 among UK GP registrars. The survey included quantitative and qualitative items assessing supervision experience, confidence, and perceptions of training. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse the data.

Results: A total of 52 registrars responded. The majority (n = 50 [96%]) reported no formal training on how to effectively supervise. Only 15% were supervising medical students, and n = 2 (4%) were supervising AHPs. Key barriers to effective supervision included lack of training, time constraints, and uncertainty about roles. Registrars expressed strong interest in structured training to build confidence in supervision.

Conclusions: GP registrars report limited training and confidence in clinical supervision, despite growing expectations to supervise a diverse primary care team. Structured educational interventions as part of continuing professional development are needed to support supervision readiness and ensure safe, effective practice in a multidisciplinary environment.

英国全科医生注册商的监管准备:一项调查研究。
背景:临床监督在医疗保健教育和患者安全中起着至关重要的作用。由于全科医生包括多学科的工作人员,全科医生注册者越来越期望从获得资格的第一天起就监督联合健康专业人员(ahp)和医学生。然而,他们对这些角色的准备程度仍不清楚。方法:我们在2024年8月至2025年1月期间对英国全科医生注册者进行了横断面在线调查。该调查包括定量和定性项目,评估监督经验、信心和对培训的看法。采用描述性统计和内容分析对数据进行分析。结果:共有52个注册商回应。大多数(n = 50[96%])报告没有接受过如何有效监督的正式培训。督导医学生的仅有15%,督导ahp的仅有n = 2(4%)。有效监督的主要障碍包括缺乏培训、时间限制和角色不确定。注册商对结构化培训表达了浓厚兴趣,以建立对监管的信心。结论:尽管越来越多的人期望能监督一个多样化的初级保健团队,但全科医生登记员对临床监督的培训和信心有限。作为持续专业发展的一部分,需要结构化的教育干预来支持监管准备,并确保在多学科环境中安全、有效的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书