Randomized, double-blind trial of preoperative pregabalin versus placebo to improve quality of recovery after breast cancer surgery

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2026.844749
Fabio Vieira Toledo, Jose Fernando Amaral Meletti, Luiza Mansur Cerioni Silva, Nathalia Maria Medeiros Serra, Maria Nathalia Prado Simoes Mendonça, Paulo Henrique Carvalho Guerra, Clóvis Antônio Lopes Pinto
{"title":"Randomized, double-blind trial of preoperative pregabalin versus placebo to improve quality of recovery after breast cancer surgery","authors":"Fabio Vieira Toledo,&nbsp;Jose Fernando Amaral Meletti,&nbsp;Luiza Mansur Cerioni Silva,&nbsp;Nathalia Maria Medeiros Serra,&nbsp;Maria Nathalia Prado Simoes Mendonça,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Carvalho Guerra,&nbsp;Clóvis Antônio Lopes Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2026.844749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Surgery remains one of the most important treatments for breast cancer. In this context, the quality of postoperative recovery has become a key concern. Adequate control of acute pain is essential to optimize patient comfort and recovery. Pregabalin may contribute to this goal by preventing central sensitization and reducing perioperative anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of perioperative pregabalin versus placebo on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this randomized controlled trial, 92 patients received either pregabalin (150 mg orally, 1 hour before surgery) or a matching placebo, both prepared in identical capsules. The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score measured preoperatively, and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. The 24- and 48-hour assessments were conducted via telephone. The QoR-15 is a validated instrument that assesses the quality of recovery, with total scores ranging from 0 (very poor recovery) to 150 (excellent recovery). Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, pain scores, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and lengths of stay in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and hospital. An exploratory analysis of longitudinal changes in QoR-15 scores within each group was also performed. Analyses were performed per protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-four patients completed the study. There were no differences in overall QoR-15 score between the groups at any of the three assessment time points (preoperative, 24h, and 48h). In the exploratory longitudinal within-group analysis, better maintenance of recovery quality was observed in the pregabalin group compared with baseline, with medians (IQR) of 138 (122.3–145), 132.5 (125.8–135.3), and 134 (131.5–136) [p = 0.006 between 24h and 48h]. In the placebo group, the medians (IQR) were 140 (128–145.3), 129 (126–134.3), and 134 (126.8–136.3) [p = 0.002 between pre and 24h; p = 0.026 between pre and 48h].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although exploratory analysis showed a trend toward improvement within the pregabalin group, there was no significant difference in QoR-15 scores between groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"76 3","pages":"Article 844749"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001426000291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Surgery remains one of the most important treatments for breast cancer. In this context, the quality of postoperative recovery has become a key concern. Adequate control of acute pain is essential to optimize patient comfort and recovery. Pregabalin may contribute to this goal by preventing central sensitization and reducing perioperative anxiety.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of perioperative pregabalin versus placebo on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Method

In this randomized controlled trial, 92 patients received either pregabalin (150 mg orally, 1 hour before surgery) or a matching placebo, both prepared in identical capsules. The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score measured preoperatively, and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. The 24- and 48-hour assessments were conducted via telephone. The QoR-15 is a validated instrument that assesses the quality of recovery, with total scores ranging from 0 (very poor recovery) to 150 (excellent recovery). Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, pain scores, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and lengths of stay in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and hospital. An exploratory analysis of longitudinal changes in QoR-15 scores within each group was also performed. Analyses were performed per protocol.

Results

Eighty-four patients completed the study. There were no differences in overall QoR-15 score between the groups at any of the three assessment time points (preoperative, 24h, and 48h). In the exploratory longitudinal within-group analysis, better maintenance of recovery quality was observed in the pregabalin group compared with baseline, with medians (IQR) of 138 (122.3–145), 132.5 (125.8–135.3), and 134 (131.5–136) [p = 0.006 between 24h and 48h]. In the placebo group, the medians (IQR) were 140 (128–145.3), 129 (126–134.3), and 134 (126.8–136.3) [p = 0.002 between pre and 24h; p = 0.026 between pre and 48h].

Conclusion

Although exploratory analysis showed a trend toward improvement within the pregabalin group, there was no significant difference in QoR-15 scores between groups.
术前普瑞巴林与安慰剂提高乳腺癌手术后恢复质量的随机双盲试验。
手术仍然是乳腺癌最重要的治疗方法之一。在这种情况下,术后恢复的质量已成为一个关键问题。充分控制急性疼痛对优化患者的舒适度和康复至关重要。普瑞巴林可能通过预防中枢致敏和减少围手术期焦虑来实现这一目标。目的:评价围手术期普瑞巴林与安慰剂对乳腺癌手术患者术后恢复质量的影响。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,92名患者接受普瑞巴林(150mg口服,术前1小时)或相匹配的安慰剂,两种胶囊制备相同。主要终点是术前、术后24小时和48小时的QoR-15评分。24小时和48小时的评估是通过电话进行的。QoR-15是一种经过验证的工具,用于评估恢复质量,总分范围从0(非常差的恢复)到150(良好的恢复)。次要结局包括阿片类药物的消耗、疼痛评分、恶心和呕吐的发生率以及在麻醉后护理单位(PACU)和医院的住院时间。还对各组QoR-15评分的纵向变化进行了探索性分析。每个方案进行分析。结果:84例患者完成了研究。在三个评估时间点(术前、24h和48h),两组间QoR-15总分均无差异。在探索性的纵向组内分析中,与基线相比,普瑞巴林组的恢复质量维持得更好,中位数(IQR)为138(122.3-145)、132.5(125.8-135.3)和134 (131.5-136)[p = 0.006,24h和48h之间]。在安慰剂组中,治疗前和24小时的中位数(IQR)分别为140(128-145.3)、129(126-134.3)和134 (126.8-136.3)[p = 0.002;P = 0.026 [h前和48h]。结论:虽然探索性分析显示普瑞巴林组有改善的趋势,但各组间QoR-15评分无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书