Meaghan Efford, Santiago de la Puente, Micheal George, Michelle George, Alessandria Testani, Spencer Taft, Jesse Morin, Jay Hilsden, Jennifer Zhu, Pengpeng Chen, Lindsey Paskulin, Ginevra Toniello, Villy Christensen, Camilla Speller
{"title":"A Fish-Focused Menu: An Interdisciplinary Reconstruction of Ancestral Tsleil-Waututh Diets.","authors":"Meaghan Efford, Santiago de la Puente, Micheal George, Michelle George, Alessandria Testani, Spencer Taft, Jesse Morin, Jay Hilsden, Jennifer Zhu, Pengpeng Chen, Lindsey Paskulin, Ginevra Toniello, Villy Christensen, Camilla Speller","doi":"10.1177/02780771241261235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of past subsistence offers archeologists a lens through which we can understand relationships between people and their homelands. səl̓ilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh) is a Coast Salish Nation whose traditional and unceded territory centers on səl̓ilwət (Tsleil-Wat, Burrard Inlet, British Columbia, Canada). səl̓ilwətaɬ people were fish specialists whose traditional diet focused primarily on marine and tidal protein sources. In this research, we draw on the archeological record, ecology, historical and archival records, and səl̓ilwətaɬ oral histories and community knowledge to build an estimated precontact diet that ancestral səl̓ilwətaɬ people obtained from səl̓ilwət. Based on prior archeological research, we assume a high protein diet that is primarily (90-100 percent) from marine and tidal sources. The four pillars of səl̓ilwətaɬ precontact diets (salmon, forage fish, shellfish, and marine birds) offer anchor points that ensure the diet is realistic, evidence-based, and representative of community knowledge. We consider the caloric needs of adults, children, elders, and those who are pregnant or lactating. Finally, we consider the variation in the edible yield from different animal species and their relationships in the food web. Together, these data and anchor points build an estimated precontact diet averaged across seasons, ages, and biological sex from approximately 1000 CE up until early European contact in approximately 1792 CE. The reconstruction of səl̓ilwətaɬ lifeways and subsistence practices, which were based on a myriad of stewardship techniques, aid our understanding of the precontact səl̓ilwətaɬ diet and the relationship between səl̓ilwətaɬ and their territory.</p>","PeriodicalId":54838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnobiology","volume":"44 3","pages":"247-263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13021004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnobiology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02780771241261235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study of past subsistence offers archeologists a lens through which we can understand relationships between people and their homelands. səl̓ilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh) is a Coast Salish Nation whose traditional and unceded territory centers on səl̓ilwət (Tsleil-Wat, Burrard Inlet, British Columbia, Canada). səl̓ilwətaɬ people were fish specialists whose traditional diet focused primarily on marine and tidal protein sources. In this research, we draw on the archeological record, ecology, historical and archival records, and səl̓ilwətaɬ oral histories and community knowledge to build an estimated precontact diet that ancestral səl̓ilwətaɬ people obtained from səl̓ilwət. Based on prior archeological research, we assume a high protein diet that is primarily (90-100 percent) from marine and tidal sources. The four pillars of səl̓ilwətaɬ precontact diets (salmon, forage fish, shellfish, and marine birds) offer anchor points that ensure the diet is realistic, evidence-based, and representative of community knowledge. We consider the caloric needs of adults, children, elders, and those who are pregnant or lactating. Finally, we consider the variation in the edible yield from different animal species and their relationships in the food web. Together, these data and anchor points build an estimated precontact diet averaged across seasons, ages, and biological sex from approximately 1000 CE up until early European contact in approximately 1792 CE. The reconstruction of səl̓ilwətaɬ lifeways and subsistence practices, which were based on a myriad of stewardship techniques, aid our understanding of the precontact səl̓ilwətaɬ diet and the relationship between səl̓ilwətaɬ and their territory.
对过去生计的研究为考古学家提供了一个视角,通过这个视角我们可以理解人类和他们的家园之间的关系。s æ l æ ilw æ ta _ (Tsleil-Waututh)是一个沿海的萨利希民族,其传统的和未割让的领土集中在s æ l æ ilw æ t (Tsleil-Wat, Burrard Inlet,不列颠哥伦比亚省,加拿大)。S ā l ā ilw ā ta ā人是鱼类专家,他们的传统饮食主要集中在海洋和潮汐蛋白质来源。在本研究中,我们利用考古记录、生态学、历史和档案记录,以及s æ l ā ilw ā ta ā口述历史和社区知识,建立了祖先s æ l ā ilw ā ta ā人从s æ l ā ilw ā t获得的预接触饮食。根据先前的考古研究,我们假设高蛋白饮食主要(90- 100%)来自海洋和潮汐资源。接触前饮食的四大支柱(鲑鱼、饲料鱼、贝类和海鸟)提供了锚点,确保饮食是现实的、以证据为基础的,并代表了社区知识。我们考虑了成人、儿童、老人以及孕妇或哺乳期妇女的热量需求。最后,我们考虑了不同动物种类的可食用产量的变化及其在食物网中的关系。总之,这些数据和锚点建立了一个估计的接触前饮食,从大约公元1000年到大约公元1792年早期欧洲接触,跨越季节、年龄和生理性别。基于无数管理技术的s ā l ā ilw ā ta生活方式和生存实践的重建,有助于我们理解接触前s ā l ā ilw ā ta饮食以及s ā l ā ilw ā ta与其领土之间的关系。
期刊介绍:
JoE’s readership is as wide and diverse as ethnobiology itself, with readers spanning from both the natural and social sciences. Not surprisingly, a glance at the papers published in the Journal reveals the depth and breadth of topics, extending from studies in archaeology and the origins of agriculture, to folk classification systems, to food composition, plants, birds, mammals, fungi and everything in between.
Research areas published in JoE include but are not limited to neo- and paleo-ethnobiology, zooarchaeology, ethnobotany, ethnozoology, ethnopharmacology, ethnoecology, linguistic ethnobiology, human paleoecology, and many other related fields of study within anthropology and biology, such as taxonomy, conservation biology, ethnography, political ecology, and cognitive and cultural anthropology.
JoE does not limit itself to a single perspective, approach or discipline, but seeks to represent the full spectrum and wide diversity of the field of ethnobiology, including cognitive, symbolic, linguistic, ecological, and economic aspects of human interactions with our living world. Articles that significantly advance ethnobiological theory and/or methodology are particularly welcome, as well as studies bridging across disciplines and knowledge systems. JoE does not publish uncontextualized data such as species lists; appropriate submissions must elaborate on the ethnobiological context of findings.