Development and validation of the pre-service teacher perceived sources of self-efficacy for differentiated instruction scale

IF 1.8 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Pearl Subban, Gemma Scarparolo
{"title":"Development and validation of the pre-service teacher perceived sources of self-efficacy for differentiated instruction scale","authors":"Pearl Subban,&nbsp;Gemma Scarparolo","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teachers are increasingly expected to differentiate instruction to address the diverse learning needs of students. Developing strong sources of self-efficacy that support differentiated instruction during initial teacher education is therefore important. Relatively little is known about pre-service teachers' perceived sources of self-efficacy for differentiated instruction, and no scale has been developed for this population. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot an evaluation of a scale designed to measure pre-service teachers' perceived sources of self-efficacy regarding differentiated instruction. The scale was informed by Bandura's model of self-efficacy and Tomlinson's framework for differentiated instruction. A pilot study was conducted with pre-service teachers (<i>N</i> = 21) enrolled in a Master of Teaching (Initial Teacher Education) program in Australia. Exploratory factor analysis was used to inform systematic item reduction and to examine the plausibility of an underlying factor structure, alongside internal consistency reliability. This resulted in a 20-item instrument comprising four theoretically coherent factors aligned with Bandura's sources of self-efficacy. Preliminary findings suggest that observation of experienced teachers and mentoring during professional experience may be salient sources of self-efficacy during the preparatory phase of teacher education. Further large-scale validation is required to establish the stability and generalisability of the scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers are increasingly expected to differentiate instruction to address the diverse learning needs of students. Developing strong sources of self-efficacy that support differentiated instruction during initial teacher education is therefore important. Relatively little is known about pre-service teachers' perceived sources of self-efficacy for differentiated instruction, and no scale has been developed for this population. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot an evaluation of a scale designed to measure pre-service teachers' perceived sources of self-efficacy regarding differentiated instruction. The scale was informed by Bandura's model of self-efficacy and Tomlinson's framework for differentiated instruction. A pilot study was conducted with pre-service teachers (N = 21) enrolled in a Master of Teaching (Initial Teacher Education) program in Australia. Exploratory factor analysis was used to inform systematic item reduction and to examine the plausibility of an underlying factor structure, alongside internal consistency reliability. This resulted in a 20-item instrument comprising four theoretically coherent factors aligned with Bandura's sources of self-efficacy. Preliminary findings suggest that observation of experienced teachers and mentoring during professional experience may be salient sources of self-efficacy during the preparatory phase of teacher education. Further large-scale validation is required to establish the stability and generalisability of the scale.

差异化教学量表职前教师自我效能感感知来源的开发与验证
越来越多的人期望教师区分教学,以满足学生不同的学习需求。因此,在最初的教师教育中发展强大的自我效能感来源以支持差异化教学是很重要的。对于职前教师对差异化教学自我效能感的感知来源了解相对较少,也没有针对这一人群开发的量表。本研究的目的是开发和试点一个量表,旨在测量职前教师对差异化教学自我效能感的感知来源。量表采用Bandura的自我效能感模型和Tomlinson的差异化教学框架。一项试点研究是在澳大利亚参加教学硕士(初级教师教育)项目的职前教师(N = 21)中进行的。探索性因子分析用于告知系统项目减少,并检查潜在因素结构的合理性,以及内部一致性可靠性。这产生了一个包含20个项目的工具,包括四个理论上连贯的因素,与班杜拉的自我效能感来源一致。初步研究结果表明,在教师教育的准备阶段,对经验丰富的教师的观察和专业经验期间的指导可能是自我效能感的主要来源。需要进一步的大规模验证来建立该量表的稳定性和通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书