Navigating Climate Governance: Intersectional Youth Visions of Just Urban Adaptation

IF 3.8 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Grace May, Meg Parsons, Karen Fisher
{"title":"Navigating Climate Governance: Intersectional Youth Visions of Just Urban Adaptation","authors":"Grace May,&nbsp;Meg Parsons,&nbsp;Karen Fisher","doi":"10.1002/geo2.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article investigates climate justice, specifically exploring youth perspectives, gender and intersectionality within urban climate adaptation governance in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand. Addressing significant gaps in existing research, it focuses explicitly on how young women and gender-diverse youth perceive climate adaptation, experience participation barriers and envision transformative pathways to achieve climate justice. Our qualitative, participatory research explores three central questions: (1) What barriers do young women and gender-diverse youth face in climate governance? (2) How do neoliberal discourses shape youth perceptions and experiences of adaptation responsibility? (3) What transformative approaches do these youth advocate for achieving inclusive climate justice? Our findings reveal significant procedural and recognitional injustices; participants described persistent marginalisation due to their age, gender identity and ethnicity, reflecting broader structural exclusions in climate governance processes. Despite initially internalising neoliberal adaptation narratives of individual resilience, participants critically challenged such discourses following experiences of inadequate systemic support during recent climate disasters. They advocated strongly for inclusive, community-based governance that addresses intersectional vulnerabilities and promotes genuine equity and procedural justice. Moreover, youth participants argued explicitly for systemic changes, including co-governance arrangements grounded in mātauranga Māori (Indigenous knowledge) and critiques of neoliberal capitalism and colonial frameworks. Ultimately, we argue that meaningful youth engagement requires transformative, intersectional approaches to climate adaptation that go beyond tokenism to redistribute decision-making power and address deeper social and environmental injustices.</p>","PeriodicalId":44089,"journal":{"name":"Geo-Geography and Environment","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/geo2.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geo-Geography and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.70049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates climate justice, specifically exploring youth perspectives, gender and intersectionality within urban climate adaptation governance in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand. Addressing significant gaps in existing research, it focuses explicitly on how young women and gender-diverse youth perceive climate adaptation, experience participation barriers and envision transformative pathways to achieve climate justice. Our qualitative, participatory research explores three central questions: (1) What barriers do young women and gender-diverse youth face in climate governance? (2) How do neoliberal discourses shape youth perceptions and experiences of adaptation responsibility? (3) What transformative approaches do these youth advocate for achieving inclusive climate justice? Our findings reveal significant procedural and recognitional injustices; participants described persistent marginalisation due to their age, gender identity and ethnicity, reflecting broader structural exclusions in climate governance processes. Despite initially internalising neoliberal adaptation narratives of individual resilience, participants critically challenged such discourses following experiences of inadequate systemic support during recent climate disasters. They advocated strongly for inclusive, community-based governance that addresses intersectional vulnerabilities and promotes genuine equity and procedural justice. Moreover, youth participants argued explicitly for systemic changes, including co-governance arrangements grounded in mātauranga Māori (Indigenous knowledge) and critiques of neoliberal capitalism and colonial frameworks. Ultimately, we argue that meaningful youth engagement requires transformative, intersectional approaches to climate adaptation that go beyond tokenism to redistribute decision-making power and address deeper social and environmental injustices.

Abstract Image

引导气候治理:跨领域青年对城市公正适应的愿景
本文研究了气候正义,特别是探讨了新西兰奥克兰城市气候适应治理中的青年观点、性别和交叉性。为了解决现有研究中的重大差距,该报告明确关注年轻女性和性别多样化的青年如何看待气候适应、体验参与障碍,并展望实现气候正义的变革途径。我们的定性、参与性研究探讨了三个核心问题:(1)年轻女性和性别多样化的青年在气候治理中面临哪些障碍?(2)新自由主义话语如何塑造青年对适应责任的认知和经验?(3)这些青年倡导哪些变革方法来实现包容性气候正义?我们的研究结果揭示了重大的程序和承认不公正;与会者描述了由于年龄、性别认同和种族而持续被边缘化的情况,反映了气候治理过程中更广泛的结构性排斥。尽管最初内化了个人恢复力的新自由主义适应叙事,但在经历了近期气候灾害期间系统支持不足的经历后,参与者对这种话语提出了严峻的挑战。他们强烈主张包容性、以社区为基础的治理,解决交叉的脆弱性,促进真正的公平和程序正义。此外,青年参与者明确主张系统性变革,包括以mātauranga Māori(土著知识)为基础的共同治理安排,以及对新自由主义资本主义和殖民框架的批评。最后,我们认为,有意义的青年参与需要变革的、交叉的气候适应方法,而不是象征性地重新分配决策权,解决更深层次的社会和环境不公正问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geo is a fully open access international journal publishing original articles from across the spectrum of geographical and environmental research. Geo welcomes submissions which make a significant contribution to one or more of the journal’s aims. These are to: • encompass the breadth of geographical, environmental and related research, based on original scholarship in the sciences, social sciences and humanities; • bring new understanding to and enhance communication between geographical research agendas, including human-environment interactions, global North-South relations and academic-policy exchange; • advance spatial research and address the importance of geographical enquiry to the understanding of, and action about, contemporary issues; • foster methodological development, including collaborative forms of knowledge production, interdisciplinary approaches and the innovative use of quantitative and/or qualitative data sets; • publish research articles, review papers, data and digital humanities papers, and commentaries which are of international significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书