A Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Porosity in Carbonate Reservoirs From Well Logs: A Case Study of Quissamã Formation Carbonate in the Campos Basin, Brazil

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Petroleum Geology Pub Date : 2026-03-11 Epub Date: 2026-01-24 DOI:10.1111/jpg.70036
Gisela M. S. Almeida, Carlos H. S. Barbosa, Maira C. O. L. Santo, Luiz Landau
{"title":"A Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Porosity in Carbonate Reservoirs From Well Logs: A Case Study of Quissamã Formation Carbonate in the Campos Basin, Brazil","authors":"Gisela M. S. Almeida,&nbsp;Carlos H. S. Barbosa,&nbsp;Maira C. O. L. Santo,&nbsp;Luiz Landau","doi":"10.1111/jpg.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Porosity estimation is a critical step in characterizing carbonate reservoirs, particularly given their complex pore systems and heterogeneity. This study proposes a data-driven approach to predict porosity in the Quissamã Formation, a carbonate unit in Brazil's Campos Basin, using supervised machine learning techniques. Routine core analysis data served as the target variable, while conventional well logs were used as input features. Eight machine learning algorithms were evaluated: Ridge Regression (RR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extremely Randomized Trees (ET), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and two Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP-1 and MLP-2). The models were optimized through hyperparameter tuning and validated using cross-validation. A total of 328 samples were used, of which 210 (from 3 wells) were allocated for training and validation and 118 (from 5 wells) reserved for blind-well testing, ensuring an independent evaluation of model generalization. Their performance was compared against four traditional porosity estimation methods based on individual and combined well logs. Overall, the machine learning models achieved higher accuracy, with RR demonstrating the most consistent results across wells. This work highlights the potential influence of data representativeness and tuning strategy on prediction performance. Although focused on the Quissamã Formation, the methodology is scalable and adaptable to other reservoirs. Moreover, machine learning models offer practical advantages, requiring no prior petrophysical knowledge and enabling real-time application during well logging, thereby facilitating timely and informed reservoir evaluations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","volume":"49 2","pages":"448-465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpg.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Porosity estimation is a critical step in characterizing carbonate reservoirs, particularly given their complex pore systems and heterogeneity. This study proposes a data-driven approach to predict porosity in the Quissamã Formation, a carbonate unit in Brazil's Campos Basin, using supervised machine learning techniques. Routine core analysis data served as the target variable, while conventional well logs were used as input features. Eight machine learning algorithms were evaluated: Ridge Regression (RR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extremely Randomized Trees (ET), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and two Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP-1 and MLP-2). The models were optimized through hyperparameter tuning and validated using cross-validation. A total of 328 samples were used, of which 210 (from 3 wells) were allocated for training and validation and 118 (from 5 wells) reserved for blind-well testing, ensuring an independent evaluation of model generalization. Their performance was compared against four traditional porosity estimation methods based on individual and combined well logs. Overall, the machine learning models achieved higher accuracy, with RR demonstrating the most consistent results across wells. This work highlights the potential influence of data representativeness and tuning strategy on prediction performance. Although focused on the Quissamã Formation, the methodology is scalable and adaptable to other reservoirs. Moreover, machine learning models offer practical advantages, requiring no prior petrophysical knowledge and enabling real-time application during well logging, thereby facilitating timely and informed reservoir evaluations.

从测井资料中预测碳酸盐岩储层孔隙度的监督式机器学习算法比较:以巴西Campos盆地Quissamã碳酸盐岩地层为例
孔隙度估算是表征碳酸盐岩储层的关键步骤,特别是考虑到其复杂的孔隙系统和非均质性。本研究提出了一种数据驱动的方法,利用监督式机器学习技术预测巴西Campos盆地碳酸盐岩单元Quissamã组的孔隙度。常规岩心分析数据作为目标变量,常规测井数据作为输入特征。评估了八种机器学习算法:岭回归(RR)、支持向量回归(SVR)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、极度随机树(ET)、k近邻(KNN)和两个多层感知器(MLP-1和MLP-2)。通过超参数调优对模型进行优化,并通过交叉验证对模型进行验证。总共使用了328个样本,其中210个(来自3口井)用于训练和验证,118个(来自5口井)用于盲井测试,确保了模型泛化的独立评估。将其性能与四种传统的基于单井和组合测井的孔隙度估计方法进行了比较。总的来说,机器学习模型达到了更高的精度,RR在井间展示了最一致的结果。这项工作强调了数据代表性和调优策略对预测性能的潜在影响。虽然主要针对Quissamã地层,但该方法可扩展并适用于其他储层。此外,机器学习模型具有实际优势,不需要事先掌握岩石物理知识,可以在测井过程中实时应用,从而促进及时、明智的储层评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Geology
Journal of Petroleum Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Petroleum Geology is a quarterly journal devoted to the geology of oil and natural gas. Editorial preference is given to original papers on oilfield regions of the world outside North America and on topics of general application in petroleum exploration and development operations, including geochemical and geophysical studies, basin modelling and reservoir evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书