Circularity in Plastic Waste Management: A Critical Review of Recycling Challenges

IF 2.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Riya Kumbukattu Alex, Suja Purushothaman Devipriya
{"title":"Circularity in Plastic Waste Management: A Critical Review of Recycling Challenges","authors":"Riya Kumbukattu Alex,&nbsp;Suja Purushothaman Devipriya","doi":"10.1002/tqem.70329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Plastic has become a globally ubiquitous commodity with widespread acceptance and utility. Its durability and affordability have enabled myriad applications. However, unsustainable consumption and poor end-of-life management have led to severe environmental repercussions. Millions of tons of plastic waste that end up in landfills and oceans each year pose a serious threat to the environment. In response to these challenges, the concept of circular economy has gained momentum, upholding the 4Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Recover as a sustainable solution for the traditional linear economy of “take-make-dispose.” Recycling is the most challenging step among these toward achieving circularity in plastic. This review critically analyses these challenges by identifying technological, market, and regulatory barriers to effective plastic recycling, including hazardous additives, unsustainable design, fragmented value chains, non-transparency in labelling, informal sector dynamics, and market constraints. Thus, an effective implementation of plastic recycling requires upstream reforms in product designing, safer material standards, market-based incentives, technological optimization, recycled-content mandates for manufacturers, integration of informal sector into formal sector, recycle-friendly behavior development among consumers, and harmonized regulatory interventions across regions. The efficient translation of these suggested recommendations needs a coordinated approach from multiple stakeholders such as government, industry, researchers, and consumers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plastic has become a globally ubiquitous commodity with widespread acceptance and utility. Its durability and affordability have enabled myriad applications. However, unsustainable consumption and poor end-of-life management have led to severe environmental repercussions. Millions of tons of plastic waste that end up in landfills and oceans each year pose a serious threat to the environment. In response to these challenges, the concept of circular economy has gained momentum, upholding the 4Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Recover as a sustainable solution for the traditional linear economy of “take-make-dispose.” Recycling is the most challenging step among these toward achieving circularity in plastic. This review critically analyses these challenges by identifying technological, market, and regulatory barriers to effective plastic recycling, including hazardous additives, unsustainable design, fragmented value chains, non-transparency in labelling, informal sector dynamics, and market constraints. Thus, an effective implementation of plastic recycling requires upstream reforms in product designing, safer material standards, market-based incentives, technological optimization, recycled-content mandates for manufacturers, integration of informal sector into formal sector, recycle-friendly behavior development among consumers, and harmonized regulatory interventions across regions. The efficient translation of these suggested recommendations needs a coordinated approach from multiple stakeholders such as government, industry, researchers, and consumers.

循环塑料废物管理:回收挑战的关键审查
塑料已经成为一种全球普遍存在的商品,具有广泛的接受性和实用性。它的耐用性和可负担性使无数应用成为可能。然而,不可持续的消费和不良的报废管理导致了严重的环境影响。每年有数百万吨的塑料垃圾最终被填埋在垃圾填埋场和海洋中,对环境构成严重威胁。为了应对这些挑战,循环经济的概念得到了发展,坚持4r:减少,再利用,循环利用和回收,作为传统线性经济的可持续解决方案。回收是实现塑料循环的最具挑战性的一步。本综述通过确定有效塑料回收的技术、市场和监管障碍,包括有害添加剂、不可持续的设计、碎片化的价值链、标签不透明、非正式部门动态和市场约束,对这些挑战进行了批判性分析。因此,有效实施塑料回收需要产品设计的上游改革、更安全的材料标准、基于市场的激励措施、技术优化、制造商的回收含量要求、非正规部门与正规部门的整合、消费者的回收友好行为发展以及跨区域协调的监管干预措施。这些建议的有效翻译需要来自多个利益相关者(如政府、行业、研究人员和消费者)的协调方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书