Passive Gauze-Based eDNA Sampler Proves Efficient and Cost-Effective in the Marine Environment

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Molly M. Kressler, Lucy Whitelegg, Benedict Tutt-Leppard, Andrew Matthews, Dave Hudson, Richard B. Sherley
{"title":"Passive Gauze-Based eDNA Sampler Proves Efficient and Cost-Effective in the Marine Environment","authors":"Molly M. Kressler,&nbsp;Lucy Whitelegg,&nbsp;Benedict Tutt-Leppard,&nbsp;Andrew Matthews,&nbsp;Dave Hudson,&nbsp;Richard B. Sherley","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While environmental DNA (eDNA) is an increasingly valuable tool for marine biodiversity monitoring, the high cost of conventional eDNA sampling methods may limit long-term or large-scale applications. Here, we present the first empirical comparison of the metaprobe 2.0, a low-cost, passive eDNA sampler, against an industry standard Sterivex filtration method using dip-collected 1-L water samples (“water bottles”). Although the metaprobe has been used in a limited number of prior studies—primarily in comparison to traditional net-based sampling—its adoption remains limited, and this is the first study to benchmark its performance directly against a widely used eDNA sampling methodology. Across 14 joint deployments, we assessed detection and quantification of eDNA of two elasmobranch and two teleost species. While Sterivex filters outperformed metaprobes in detecting copies of DNA, metaprobes showed comparable detection performance within biologically significant margins and exhibited a lower variance among sampling replicates. Our study is the next step in the upscaling of this passive sampler and establishes a workflow for integrating metaprobes into biodiversity and species monitoring in marine ecology. We outline the methodological deviations from a “traditional” Sterivex filter eDNA workflow and identify how metaprobes might widen the accessibility of eDNA monitoring in the future through their simple yet effective sampling, filtering, and preservation protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70256","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While environmental DNA (eDNA) is an increasingly valuable tool for marine biodiversity monitoring, the high cost of conventional eDNA sampling methods may limit long-term or large-scale applications. Here, we present the first empirical comparison of the metaprobe 2.0, a low-cost, passive eDNA sampler, against an industry standard Sterivex filtration method using dip-collected 1-L water samples (“water bottles”). Although the metaprobe has been used in a limited number of prior studies—primarily in comparison to traditional net-based sampling—its adoption remains limited, and this is the first study to benchmark its performance directly against a widely used eDNA sampling methodology. Across 14 joint deployments, we assessed detection and quantification of eDNA of two elasmobranch and two teleost species. While Sterivex filters outperformed metaprobes in detecting copies of DNA, metaprobes showed comparable detection performance within biologically significant margins and exhibited a lower variance among sampling replicates. Our study is the next step in the upscaling of this passive sampler and establishes a workflow for integrating metaprobes into biodiversity and species monitoring in marine ecology. We outline the methodological deviations from a “traditional” Sterivex filter eDNA workflow and identify how metaprobes might widen the accessibility of eDNA monitoring in the future through their simple yet effective sampling, filtering, and preservation protocols.

Abstract Image

被动式纱布基eDNA取样器在海洋环境中被证明是高效且经济的
虽然环境DNA (eDNA)是海洋生物多样性监测中越来越有价值的工具,但传统eDNA采样方法的高成本可能会限制其长期或大规模应用。在这里,我们首次对metaprobe 2.0(一种低成本的被动eDNA采样器)与行业标准的Sterivex过滤方法进行了实证比较,该方法使用浸渍收集的1升水样(“水瓶”)。尽管metaprobe已经在有限数量的先前研究中使用-主要是与传统的基于网络的采样相比-它的采用仍然有限,这是第一个将其性能直接与广泛使用的eDNA采样方法进行基准测试的研究。在14次联合部署中,我们评估了两种板鳃鱼和两种硬骨鱼的eDNA检测和量化。虽然Sterivex过滤器在检测DNA拷贝方面优于元探针,但元探针在生物学显著范围内显示出相当的检测性能,并且在采样重复之间表现出较低的方差。我们的研究是该被动采样器升级的下一步,并建立了将超探针整合到海洋生态生物多样性和物种监测中的工作流程。我们概述了与“传统”Sterivex筛选eDNA工作流程的方法偏差,并确定元探针如何通过其简单而有效的采样、过滤和保存协议,在未来扩大eDNA监测的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书