Azamat Zakirov, Ilyas Yanbukhtin, Andreas Stele, Ulugbek Musaev, Jörg W. E. Fassbinder
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Archaeological Geophysics: Testing ChatGPT-4o on Magnetometer Data From Sapallitepa (Uzbekistan)","authors":"Azamat Zakirov, Ilyas Yanbukhtin, Andreas Stele, Ulugbek Musaev, Jörg W. E. Fassbinder","doi":"10.1002/arp.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Archaeogeophysical prospection methods have become essential for the preparation and implementation of archaeological projects. This study evaluates the potential of ChatGPT-4o, a large language model (LLM), to process grid-based magnetometer data collected near the Late Bronze Age site of Sapallitepa in Uzbekistan (ca. 1600–1200 <span>bce</span>). The aim was to assess whether natural language interaction could serve as a viable alternative to traditional software pipelines such as Geoplot 4.0. Both approaches—Geoplot and ChatGPT—were used to process the same field dataset, resulting in detailed magnetic anomaly maps that revealed subsurface archaeological features. While Geoplot required expert operation and domain-specific configuration, ChatGPT processed the data based solely on textual prompts. In this study, ChatGPT-4o is treated as a natural language interface for applying standard geophysical processing steps. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT, when guided by well-formulated instructions, can deliver results comparable to those of specialized geophysical software. While domain expertise remains essential for meaningful interpretation, such tools could lower the barrier to entry for archaeological data processing. These results suggest a promising future for integrating AI-driven methodologies into archaeogeophysical workflows, improving both accessibility and automation in data analysis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55490,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Prospection","volume":"33 1","pages":"3-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Prospection","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Archaeogeophysical prospection methods have become essential for the preparation and implementation of archaeological projects. This study evaluates the potential of ChatGPT-4o, a large language model (LLM), to process grid-based magnetometer data collected near the Late Bronze Age site of Sapallitepa in Uzbekistan (ca. 1600–1200 bce). The aim was to assess whether natural language interaction could serve as a viable alternative to traditional software pipelines such as Geoplot 4.0. Both approaches—Geoplot and ChatGPT—were used to process the same field dataset, resulting in detailed magnetic anomaly maps that revealed subsurface archaeological features. While Geoplot required expert operation and domain-specific configuration, ChatGPT processed the data based solely on textual prompts. In this study, ChatGPT-4o is treated as a natural language interface for applying standard geophysical processing steps. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT, when guided by well-formulated instructions, can deliver results comparable to those of specialized geophysical software. While domain expertise remains essential for meaningful interpretation, such tools could lower the barrier to entry for archaeological data processing. These results suggest a promising future for integrating AI-driven methodologies into archaeogeophysical workflows, improving both accessibility and automation in data analysis.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the Journal will be international, covering urban, rural and marine environments and the full range of underlying geology.
The Journal will contain articles relating to the use of a wide range of propecting techniques, including remote sensing (airborne and satellite), geophysical (e.g. resistivity, magnetometry) and geochemical (e.g. organic markers, soil phosphate). Reports and field evaluations of new techniques will be welcomed.
Contributions will be encouraged on the application of relevant software, including G.I.S. analysis, to the data derived from prospection techniques and cartographic analysis of early maps.
Reports on integrated site evaluations and follow-up site investigations will be particularly encouraged.
The Journal will welcome contributions, in the form of short (field) reports, on the application of prospection techniques in support of comprehensive land-use studies.
The Journal will, as appropriate, contain book reviews, conference and meeting reviews, and software evaluation.
All papers will be subjected to peer review.