Artificial Intelligence in Archaeological Geophysics: Testing ChatGPT-4o on Magnetometer Data From Sapallitepa (Uzbekistan)

IF 2.5 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeological Prospection Pub Date : 2026-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1002/arp.70006
Azamat Zakirov, Ilyas Yanbukhtin, Andreas Stele, Ulugbek Musaev, Jörg W. E. Fassbinder
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Archaeological Geophysics: Testing ChatGPT-4o on Magnetometer Data From Sapallitepa (Uzbekistan)","authors":"Azamat Zakirov,&nbsp;Ilyas Yanbukhtin,&nbsp;Andreas Stele,&nbsp;Ulugbek Musaev,&nbsp;Jörg W. E. Fassbinder","doi":"10.1002/arp.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Archaeogeophysical prospection methods have become essential for the preparation and implementation of archaeological projects. This study evaluates the potential of ChatGPT-4o, a large language model (LLM), to process grid-based magnetometer data collected near the Late Bronze Age site of Sapallitepa in Uzbekistan (ca. 1600–1200 <span>bce</span>). The aim was to assess whether natural language interaction could serve as a viable alternative to traditional software pipelines such as Geoplot 4.0. Both approaches—Geoplot and ChatGPT—were used to process the same field dataset, resulting in detailed magnetic anomaly maps that revealed subsurface archaeological features. While Geoplot required expert operation and domain-specific configuration, ChatGPT processed the data based solely on textual prompts. In this study, ChatGPT-4o is treated as a natural language interface for applying standard geophysical processing steps. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT, when guided by well-formulated instructions, can deliver results comparable to those of specialized geophysical software. While domain expertise remains essential for meaningful interpretation, such tools could lower the barrier to entry for archaeological data processing. These results suggest a promising future for integrating AI-driven methodologies into archaeogeophysical workflows, improving both accessibility and automation in data analysis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55490,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Prospection","volume":"33 1","pages":"3-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Prospection","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archaeogeophysical prospection methods have become essential for the preparation and implementation of archaeological projects. This study evaluates the potential of ChatGPT-4o, a large language model (LLM), to process grid-based magnetometer data collected near the Late Bronze Age site of Sapallitepa in Uzbekistan (ca. 1600–1200 bce). The aim was to assess whether natural language interaction could serve as a viable alternative to traditional software pipelines such as Geoplot 4.0. Both approaches—Geoplot and ChatGPT—were used to process the same field dataset, resulting in detailed magnetic anomaly maps that revealed subsurface archaeological features. While Geoplot required expert operation and domain-specific configuration, ChatGPT processed the data based solely on textual prompts. In this study, ChatGPT-4o is treated as a natural language interface for applying standard geophysical processing steps. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT, when guided by well-formulated instructions, can deliver results comparable to those of specialized geophysical software. While domain expertise remains essential for meaningful interpretation, such tools could lower the barrier to entry for archaeological data processing. These results suggest a promising future for integrating AI-driven methodologies into archaeogeophysical workflows, improving both accessibility and automation in data analysis.

考古地球物理学中的人工智能:基于乌兹别克斯坦Sapallitepa磁强计数据的chatgpt - 40测试
考古物探方法在考古工程的准备和实施中已成为必不可少的手段。这项研究评估了chatgpt - 40(一个大型语言模型)处理在乌兹别克斯坦Sapallitepa青铜时代晚期遗址(约公元前1600-1200年)附近收集的基于网格的磁力计数据的潜力。其目的是评估自然语言交互是否可以作为传统软件管道(如Geoplot 4.0)的可行替代方案。geoplot和chatgpt这两种方法被用于处理相同的野外数据集,得到了详细的磁异常图,揭示了地下考古特征。Geoplot需要专家操作和特定领域的配置,而ChatGPT仅基于文本提示处理数据。在本研究中,chatgpt - 40被视为应用标准地球物理处理步骤的自然语言接口。我们的研究结果表明,在精心制定的指令指导下,ChatGPT可以提供与专业地球物理软件相当的结果。虽然领域专业知识对于有意义的解释仍然至关重要,但这些工具可以降低考古数据处理的进入门槛。这些结果表明,将人工智能驱动的方法集成到考古地球物理工作流程中,提高数据分析的可访问性和自动化程度,前景广阔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological Prospection
Archaeological Prospection 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal will be international, covering urban, rural and marine environments and the full range of underlying geology. The Journal will contain articles relating to the use of a wide range of propecting techniques, including remote sensing (airborne and satellite), geophysical (e.g. resistivity, magnetometry) and geochemical (e.g. organic markers, soil phosphate). Reports and field evaluations of new techniques will be welcomed. Contributions will be encouraged on the application of relevant software, including G.I.S. analysis, to the data derived from prospection techniques and cartographic analysis of early maps. Reports on integrated site evaluations and follow-up site investigations will be particularly encouraged. The Journal will welcome contributions, in the form of short (field) reports, on the application of prospection techniques in support of comprehensive land-use studies. The Journal will, as appropriate, contain book reviews, conference and meeting reviews, and software evaluation. All papers will be subjected to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书