Division of Labor, Multiplication of Gratitude? Gratitude and Resentment Within Households

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2026-03-02 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1111/jomf.70029
Allison Daminger, Amanda Nerenberg, Rachel Drapper, Alexandra C. Feldberg, Kathleen L. McGinn
{"title":"Division of Labor, Multiplication of Gratitude? Gratitude and Resentment Within Households","authors":"Allison Daminger,&nbsp;Amanda Nerenberg,&nbsp;Rachel Drapper,&nbsp;Alexandra C. Feldberg,&nbsp;Kathleen L. McGinn","doi":"10.1111/jomf.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This paper investigates contemporary household economies of gratitude and resentment, assessing how discrepancies between partners' expectations relate to their emotions and household labor allocation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Women shoulder greater shares of cognitive and physical housework than men. Prior research suggests expressions of gratitude reveal the underlying expectations that reproduce and/or challenge gender-traditional labor allocations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This article draws on qualitative analysis of 209 interviews with 37 men and 41 women in dual-income, mixed-gender couples with children, interviewed two or three times each.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Expressions of gratitude and resentment revealed considerable divergence between men's and women's expectations. Some women were grateful for men's participation in physical labor; others expected significant physical and cognitive contributions and resented their absence. Most men expected to contribute physical household labor and were grateful when women's unpaid housework left more time than expected for men's paid work. Men's resentment emerged when they felt their physical contributions were underappreciated or their partner had unreasonable expectations for their cognitive labor participation. Resentment eased in cases where men increased their attunement and women their use of delegation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our longitudinal dataset enabled us to examine implicit gender ideologies as reflected in respondents' gratitude and resentment and to chart shifts in expectations and labor allocations in close to real time. These findings broaden our understanding of why household labor remains strongly gender-typed and reveal how quantitative measures of gender ideology may not capture nuanced perspectives—particularly vis-à-vis the division of cognitive labor.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"88 2","pages":"442-456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.70029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This paper investigates contemporary household economies of gratitude and resentment, assessing how discrepancies between partners' expectations relate to their emotions and household labor allocation.

Background

Women shoulder greater shares of cognitive and physical housework than men. Prior research suggests expressions of gratitude reveal the underlying expectations that reproduce and/or challenge gender-traditional labor allocations.

Methods

This article draws on qualitative analysis of 209 interviews with 37 men and 41 women in dual-income, mixed-gender couples with children, interviewed two or three times each.

Results

Expressions of gratitude and resentment revealed considerable divergence between men's and women's expectations. Some women were grateful for men's participation in physical labor; others expected significant physical and cognitive contributions and resented their absence. Most men expected to contribute physical household labor and were grateful when women's unpaid housework left more time than expected for men's paid work. Men's resentment emerged when they felt their physical contributions were underappreciated or their partner had unreasonable expectations for their cognitive labor participation. Resentment eased in cases where men increased their attunement and women their use of delegation.

Conclusion

Our longitudinal dataset enabled us to examine implicit gender ideologies as reflected in respondents' gratitude and resentment and to chart shifts in expectations and labor allocations in close to real time. These findings broaden our understanding of why household labor remains strongly gender-typed and reveal how quantitative measures of gender ideology may not capture nuanced perspectives—particularly vis-à-vis the division of cognitive labor.

劳动分工,感恩倍增?家庭中的感恩和怨恨
目的研究当代感恩和怨恨的家庭经济,评估伴侣期望差异与他们的情绪和家庭劳动分配之间的关系。女性比男性承担更多的认知和体力家务。先前的研究表明,感恩的表达揭示了潜在的期望,这种期望会再现和/或挑战性别传统的劳动分配。方法对有子女的双收入男女混合夫妻37对、41对,各2 ~ 3次的209次访谈进行定性分析。结果感恩和怨恨的表达显示了男性和女性的期望有很大的差异。有些女性对男性参与体力劳动心存感激;另一些人则期望在身体和认知方面做出重大贡献,并对他们的缺席感到不满。大多数男性希望贡献体力家务劳动,当女性的无偿家务比男性的有偿工作腾出更多时间时,他们会感到感激。当男性感到自己的身体贡献被低估,或者伴侣对他们的认知劳动参与有不合理的期望时,他们就会产生怨恨。当男性增加了他们的协调,而女性增加了他们的授权时,怨恨就减轻了。我们的纵向数据集使我们能够研究隐含的性别意识形态,反映在受访者的感激和怨恨中,并绘制出接近实时的期望和劳动力分配的变化。这些发现拓宽了我们对为什么家庭劳动仍然存在强烈的性别类型的理解,并揭示了性别意识形态的定量测量可能无法捕捉到细微的观点,特别是对于-à-vis认知劳动分工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书