Survey and Sequence Strategies for Full-3D Electrical Resistivity Tomography in Archaeological Sites: A Case Study on a Domus of the Roman Town of Augusta Bagiennorum (NW Italy)

IF 2.5 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeological Prospection Pub Date : 2026-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1002/arp.70013
Andrea Vergnano, Diego Franco, Antonio Merico, Francesca Pace, Sofia Uggè, Cesare Comina
{"title":"Survey and Sequence Strategies for Full-3D Electrical Resistivity Tomography in Archaeological Sites: A Case Study on a Domus of the Roman Town of Augusta Bagiennorum (NW Italy)","authors":"Andrea Vergnano,&nbsp;Diego Franco,&nbsp;Antonio Merico,&nbsp;Francesca Pace,&nbsp;Sofia Uggè,&nbsp;Cesare Comina","doi":"10.1002/arp.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Preliminary geophysical investigations are a cost-effective and efficient way to screen archaeological sites and locate buried structures. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is one of the most widely used methods for archaeological prospection, but in some sites, it cannot be employed effectively due to the presence of clay or other electrically conductive materials, which strongly attenuate the electromagnetic signal, or due to bumped terrain, which demands rigorous signal analysis. Alternatively, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) can be adopted in these situations. However, ERT is not as frequently adopted as GPR for archaeological purposes because it is more time and cost consuming and, generally, has worse resolution. In this study, we aim to test a full-3D ERT approach to improve the imaging quality of ERT surveys for archaeological prospections. We develop specific survey strategies, including a custom open-source quadrupole sequence generator, studied for achieving high sensitivity to archaeological remains within the first metres of subsoil. We performed a test survey on a well-known archaeological site (the Roman town of Augusta Bagiennorum, NW Italy) and compared the results with a state-of-the-art multichannel GPR acquisition. The results showed that both GPR and ERT equally located the outer and inner walls of a complex Roman residential building. Moreover, the ERT could locate two targets, barely visible in the GPR survey, with the antenna used. We also compared the results of our full-3D ERT approach to a more common quasi-3D approach. We found that the full-3D approach overcomes the directional bias found in our quasi-3D acquisitions and provides a more accurate subsurface resistivity model. This methodology is ready to be employed in other archaeological sites and, differently from GPR, can easily operate on bumped terrain, in the presence of clay, and potentially reach greater investigation depths.</p>","PeriodicalId":55490,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Prospection","volume":"33 1","pages":"87-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arp.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Prospection","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preliminary geophysical investigations are a cost-effective and efficient way to screen archaeological sites and locate buried structures. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is one of the most widely used methods for archaeological prospection, but in some sites, it cannot be employed effectively due to the presence of clay or other electrically conductive materials, which strongly attenuate the electromagnetic signal, or due to bumped terrain, which demands rigorous signal analysis. Alternatively, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) can be adopted in these situations. However, ERT is not as frequently adopted as GPR for archaeological purposes because it is more time and cost consuming and, generally, has worse resolution. In this study, we aim to test a full-3D ERT approach to improve the imaging quality of ERT surveys for archaeological prospections. We develop specific survey strategies, including a custom open-source quadrupole sequence generator, studied for achieving high sensitivity to archaeological remains within the first metres of subsoil. We performed a test survey on a well-known archaeological site (the Roman town of Augusta Bagiennorum, NW Italy) and compared the results with a state-of-the-art multichannel GPR acquisition. The results showed that both GPR and ERT equally located the outer and inner walls of a complex Roman residential building. Moreover, the ERT could locate two targets, barely visible in the GPR survey, with the antenna used. We also compared the results of our full-3D ERT approach to a more common quasi-3D approach. We found that the full-3D approach overcomes the directional bias found in our quasi-3D acquisitions and provides a more accurate subsurface resistivity model. This methodology is ready to be employed in other archaeological sites and, differently from GPR, can easily operate on bumped terrain, in the presence of clay, and potentially reach greater investigation depths.

Abstract Image

考古遗址全三维电阻率层析成像的调查与序列策略——以意大利西北部奥古斯塔·巴吉埃诺鲁姆罗马小镇的一个Domus为例
初步地球物理调查是筛选考古遗址和定位埋藏结构的一种经济有效的方法。探地雷达(GPR)是考古勘探中使用最广泛的方法之一,但在一些遗址中,由于粘土或其他导电材料的存在,电磁信号会受到强烈的衰减,或者由于起伏的地形,需要对信号进行严格的分析,因此无法有效地使用它。或者,在这些情况下可以采用电阻率层析成像(ERT)。然而,在考古方面,ERT并不像GPR那样经常被采用,因为它花费更多的时间和成本,而且通常具有更差的分辨率。在这项研究中,我们的目标是测试一种全三维ERT方法,以提高考古勘探ERT调查的成像质量。我们制定了具体的调查策略,包括一个定制的开源四极序列发生器,研究了在底土的第一米内实现对考古遗迹的高灵敏度。我们在一个著名的考古遗址(意大利西北部的罗马城镇Augusta Bagiennorum)进行了测试调查,并将结果与最先进的多通道GPR采集进行了比较。结果表明,探地雷达和ERT对一座复杂的罗马民居的外墙和内墙的定位是相同的。此外,使用天线,ERT可以定位两个目标,在GPR调查中几乎看不到。我们还比较了我们的全3d ERT方法和更常见的准3d方法的结果。我们发现,全3d方法克服了准3d采集中发现的方向偏差,并提供了更准确的地下电阻率模型。这种方法可以在其他考古遗址中使用,与GPR不同的是,它可以很容易地在凹凸不平的地形上操作,在粘土的存在下,并且可能达到更大的调查深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological Prospection
Archaeological Prospection 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal will be international, covering urban, rural and marine environments and the full range of underlying geology. The Journal will contain articles relating to the use of a wide range of propecting techniques, including remote sensing (airborne and satellite), geophysical (e.g. resistivity, magnetometry) and geochemical (e.g. organic markers, soil phosphate). Reports and field evaluations of new techniques will be welcomed. Contributions will be encouraged on the application of relevant software, including G.I.S. analysis, to the data derived from prospection techniques and cartographic analysis of early maps. Reports on integrated site evaluations and follow-up site investigations will be particularly encouraged. The Journal will welcome contributions, in the form of short (field) reports, on the application of prospection techniques in support of comprehensive land-use studies. The Journal will, as appropriate, contain book reviews, conference and meeting reviews, and software evaluation. All papers will be subjected to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书