{"title":"A Systematic Review of Pacific Collective Responses to COVID-19 (Im)Mobility","authors":"Ruth (Lute) Faleolo","doi":"10.1111/gec3.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article presents a systematic review of Pacific collectives' responses to mobility disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining how communities negotiated the relational dynamics of mobility and immobility. Guided by three review questions—(1) How did Pacific collectives navigate (im)mobility during COVID-19? (2) What roles did digital mobilities and the Digital Vā play in sustaining connection? (3) What conceptual and methodological directions emerge for future Pacific mobilities research?—the review synthesises 20 publications (2020–2024). Sources were identified through database searches (Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar), journal archives, and relevant grey literature, using inclusion criteria that privilege Pacific perspectives and culturally grounded analysis. The thematic synthesis identifies five response areas—empowering networks, maintaining connections, strengthening intergenerational ties, mobilising educational collectives, and redistributing resources—and four cross-cutting themes—reconnection, revival, redefining, and reimagining. Together, these demonstrate how families and communities indigenised immobility by renewing cultural practices, reshaping digital relational spaces, and creatively reconfiguring tā (rhythms of time) and vā (relational space). Conceptually, the review advances understandings of relational (im)mobility, by distinguishing general digital mobilities from the culturally grounded Digital Vā, which extends Indigenous ethics of reciprocity, care, and collective wellbeing into online spaces. By foregrounding Pacific-authored scholarship, this article contributes to debates on mobility justice and digital mobilities, challenging deficit-driven narratives and highlighting culturally embedded forms of resilience, adaptation, and collective agency that emerged during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.70070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents a systematic review of Pacific collectives' responses to mobility disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining how communities negotiated the relational dynamics of mobility and immobility. Guided by three review questions—(1) How did Pacific collectives navigate (im)mobility during COVID-19? (2) What roles did digital mobilities and the Digital Vā play in sustaining connection? (3) What conceptual and methodological directions emerge for future Pacific mobilities research?—the review synthesises 20 publications (2020–2024). Sources were identified through database searches (Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar), journal archives, and relevant grey literature, using inclusion criteria that privilege Pacific perspectives and culturally grounded analysis. The thematic synthesis identifies five response areas—empowering networks, maintaining connections, strengthening intergenerational ties, mobilising educational collectives, and redistributing resources—and four cross-cutting themes—reconnection, revival, redefining, and reimagining. Together, these demonstrate how families and communities indigenised immobility by renewing cultural practices, reshaping digital relational spaces, and creatively reconfiguring tā (rhythms of time) and vā (relational space). Conceptually, the review advances understandings of relational (im)mobility, by distinguishing general digital mobilities from the culturally grounded Digital Vā, which extends Indigenous ethics of reciprocity, care, and collective wellbeing into online spaces. By foregrounding Pacific-authored scholarship, this article contributes to debates on mobility justice and digital mobilities, challenging deficit-driven narratives and highlighting culturally embedded forms of resilience, adaptation, and collective agency that emerged during the pandemic.
本文系统回顾了太平洋地区集体在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间应对流动性中断的情况,研究了社区如何协调流动性和不流动性之间的关系动态。在三个审查问题的指导下,(1)太平洋集体如何在COVID-19期间应对(im)流动性?(2)数字移动和数字Vā在维持联系方面发挥了什么作用?(3)未来太平洋机动性研究的概念和方法方向是什么?-综述综合了20篇出版物(2020-2024)。通过数据库搜索(Scopus、Web of Science、b谷歌Scholar)、期刊档案和相关灰色文献确定来源,采用优先考虑太平洋视角和文化基础分析的纳入标准。主题综合确定了五个应对领域——增强网络、保持联系、加强代际关系、动员教育集体和重新分配资源——以及四个交叉主题——重新连接、复兴、重新定义和重新想象。总之,这些都展示了家庭和社区如何通过更新文化习俗、重塑数字关系空间以及创造性地重新配置时间节奏和关系空间来本土化不动。从概念上讲,通过将一般的数字流动与基于文化的数字流动区分开来,该综述推进了对关系(非)流动的理解,数字流动将互惠、关怀和集体福祉的土著伦理扩展到在线空间。通过突出太平洋撰写的学术成果,本文促进了关于流动性正义和数字流动性的辩论,挑战了赤字驱动的叙述,并强调了在大流行期间出现的文化嵌入的复原力、适应和集体机构形式。
期刊介绍:
Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.