From inaction to integration? Media coverage of climate-health policy approaches and solution target in global north-south countries

IF 3.6
Rabia Qusien
{"title":"From inaction to integration? Media coverage of climate-health policy approaches and solution target in global north-south countries","authors":"Rabia Qusien","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Climate change has become a major health concern worldwide, while the policy response to these challenges exists in silos. In democracies, the media have the power to influence the policy agenda by highlighting certain issues and they act as a key platform for debating the political, social, and health implications of climate change. This research reveals how policy discourse is communicated to the public, directly influencing the political feasibility and social acceptance of climate-health policy actions.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This research presents an analysis of media coverage of government approaches and solutions across the Global North (the United States and the United Kingdom) and the South (Pakistan and India). A quantitative content analysis of two newspapers from each country, from 2015 to 2024, was conducted to analyze the government's approach.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>Media coverage of climate and health reveals that inaction prevails across all selected countries, while sustainable policy responses are less emphasized. Denial of the climate-health connection is more prevalent in the Global North, particularly in the United States. After 2019, media coverage showed a reactive response to the issue. Media in all countries focused on government-led initiatives to manage health issues caused by climate change (47.4 %). Even the media in the Global South missed the opportunity to highlight global cooperation for climate-health action.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that a country-specific anticipatory approach for integrating climate and health considerations into policy and communication across regions is needed to mitigate the health impacts of climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822500118X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Climate change has become a major health concern worldwide, while the policy response to these challenges exists in silos. In democracies, the media have the power to influence the policy agenda by highlighting certain issues and they act as a key platform for debating the political, social, and health implications of climate change. This research reveals how policy discourse is communicated to the public, directly influencing the political feasibility and social acceptance of climate-health policy actions.

Method

This research presents an analysis of media coverage of government approaches and solutions across the Global North (the United States and the United Kingdom) and the South (Pakistan and India). A quantitative content analysis of two newspapers from each country, from 2015 to 2024, was conducted to analyze the government's approach.

Result

Media coverage of climate and health reveals that inaction prevails across all selected countries, while sustainable policy responses are less emphasized. Denial of the climate-health connection is more prevalent in the Global North, particularly in the United States. After 2019, media coverage showed a reactive response to the issue. Media in all countries focused on government-led initiatives to manage health issues caused by climate change (47.4 %). Even the media in the Global South missed the opportunity to highlight global cooperation for climate-health action.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that a country-specific anticipatory approach for integrating climate and health considerations into policy and communication across regions is needed to mitigate the health impacts of climate change.
从无所作为到融合?媒体对全球南北国家气候卫生政策方法和解决方案目标的报道
气候变化已成为世界范围内的一个主要健康问题,而针对这些挑战的政策反应却各不相同。在民主国家,媒体有能力通过强调某些问题来影响政策议程,它们是辩论气候变化对政治、社会和健康影响的关键平台。本研究揭示了政策话语如何传达给公众,直接影响气候健康政策行动的政治可行性和社会接受度。本研究分析了全球北部(美国和英国)和南部(巴基斯坦和印度)媒体对政府方法和解决方案的报道。本文对2015年至2024年每个国家的两份报纸进行了定量内容分析,以分析政府的做法。结果媒体对气候和健康的报道表明,所有选定的国家普遍不作为,而可持续的政策反应则较少受到重视。否认气候与健康之间的联系在全球北方更为普遍,尤其是在美国。2019年之后,媒体对这一问题的报道呈现出被动反应。所有国家的媒体都将重点放在政府主导的管理气候变化引起的健康问题的举措上(47.4%)。就连全球南方的媒体也错过了强调气候卫生行动全球合作的机会。这些发现表明,为了减轻气候变化对健康的影响,需要采取针对具体国家的前瞻性方法,将气候和健康因素纳入跨区域的政策和沟通中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书